-
Posts
1999 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by westr
-
That’s what I would like to find out. As far as I understand it our current P-51 is based on a variant mainly used in the Pacific theatre
-
After the news that we will be getting the new P-51 in the next OB update I’m really excited about this. Wonder if ED could update us on what extra features we will notice. I know about the updated cockpit textures, but will we have a more appropriate WWII mustang pilot like other DCS WWII modules. Will we notice any difference in performance compared to our current Mustang. I eagerly await.
-
Thanks guys. Looking forward to this so much.
-
Yes I would like to see this more than flyable versions, reason being standards are so high now I see no point in flying in a different aircraft cockpit with a simple flight model. However their are some really talented model makers out their that could produce high quality a.i units which is what DCs world needs particularly Dcs ww2. I just don’t want the extra files on my pc just to have it flyable.
-
No the demo had recordings incorporated for effect unfortunately.
-
I've noticed VR improvements on the newsletter. Can this be looked at please ED developers. VR colours are just not right at the moment especially in Normandy, just too vivid.
-
Add loads of turbulence and some wind in the ME. You will get movement when turning etc.
-
I love the Mi-8. But it can carry weapons. As for the DC3. I love the look of it, always have. Probably wouldn’t be able to say no if it become available.
-
Some designs made their mark in both civil aviation and the military. The DC3 for example or in the helicopter world the mi-8. These are aircraft I have no problem with incorporated into DCS world. But ultimately I would prefer to see DCS remain as a combat simulator.
-
I do want better VR performance. Other sims seem to have a better grasp of VR at present. I would like to see DCS catch up.
-
PointCTRL - Finger Mounted VR Controller
westr replied to MilesD's topic in PC Hardware and Related Software
I am definitely interested Miles. Look forward to the possibility of getting this.- 3421 replies
-
- vr flight simulation
- vr gloves
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
F-14 Gameplay live today "this Saturday evening" (no clickbait)
westr replied to GrizzlyBear83's topic in DCS: F-14A & B
Does anybody know if they have developed a pilot body for the Tomcat? I did not see one in the livestream, and is it a planned feature if it’s not developed yet? -
They did state something along the lines of although they could not guarantee a release before Christmas it would make business sense if they could do so. I think HB will do their very best, but it may be a bit too much to get done in time?
-
I’m instantly on the brakes dabbing them the moment I’m down with the spit whilst maintaining a straight line with the rudders this prevents the severe yawing and wing tipping for me, once some off the speed has scrubbed off I pull the stick aft and keep dabbing the brakes to slow her right down.
-
[ATTACH][/ATTACH] MUERTE NEGRA. Absolutely awesome guys. Thankyou. The pretty one as well not the Ugly FA2.
-
F-14, the long waited aircraft! Will MIG-31BM be the next?
westr replied to Maverick Su-35S's topic in DCS: F-14A & B
Wasn’t interested in a Mig-31. Got the Tomcat and as far as I was concerned that’s the only interceptor I need. However, I watched a really cool video about the 31 and I have to admit it’s a really interesting aircraft with some really cool features, plus the Caucasus map is an appropriate setting. So yeah I was wrong about the Mig-31 it would be really cool. Unfortunately gathering enough info on the type may prove the problem. We have reached a stage with DCS where I will start to choose the modules I buy instead of buying them all as I struggle as it is to find the time to fully learn the ones I have and the Tomcat alone will take enough time to master. I look out now for interesting modules, personally I feel we have enough trainer aircraft now and I see no need to release anymore. I’m sure some people may feel differently about this. So I agree about the Mig-31 after a Tornado :megalol: -
Looking forward to the updated Hermes Joey
-
Good video. Sad to think the Tornado will be gone from the RAF in the near future. I remember getting warplane magazine as a kid and the Tornado was one of the first articles. Reading about it set the imagination wild. Back then it was an absolutely state of art strike/interdiction aircraft, and I have loved the Tornado ever since.
-
Well I shall wait and see what he says.
-
I have to say this is already a big step forward compared to anything we already have. I really like it. Will it eventually be implemented to mirage and harrier?
-
Wow this is great. Very fluid.
-
This was what I was hoping to have clarified. Thanks Nick.
-
I’m looking forward to LGB’s with the B and was so glad and appreciative that HB are making it, but a large part of me can not wait for the A and all the quirks it will bring. Sounds like you will really need to manage her to get the best out of her. I remember reading an F-14 pilot describing that the F-14a could more or less do everything the B and D could do in ACM it was just a lot more difficult to do it. That special whining noise the TF-30s make as well, it just sounds like TOP GUN.
-
Seen a good question and answer on quora.com and thought I would share. In Top Gun it seems that every time an F-14 passes anywhere near another aircraft’s ‘jet-wash’ there was a huge risk of flame out. How accurate is that during ‘real life’ ACM? John Chesire John Chesire, TOPGUN graduate, and around when the movie was filmed. Answered Oct 16 · Upvoted by Glenn Davis, former Boatswain's Mate 2nd Class at United States Navy (19… and Adrian Kruger, Qualified pilot with a PPL, student of all things Aviation. TL;DR - Yes it was accurate. While it might not have happened “every time” in real life it did happen far more than it ever should have. As explained by Jim Mowreader the early F-14A had a terrible engine to put into a fighter, the Pratt & Whitney TF30 fan engine. It was extremely susceptible to engine stalls and was thankfully replaced later by the far more applicable and rugged General Electric F110-GE-400 afterburning turbofans in later F-14 models. I remember the first time a similar incident occurred in real life. On April 19, 1977 a pilot from VF-124 [Lt. G.A. ‘Bean” Barrett] was practicing the simulated “gunnery pattern” over the Salton Sea with several other F-14 aircraft in the pattern. While in the pattern Bean crossed the wake and jet wash of another F-14 in front of him. One or both of his engines stalled, and I believe he entered the dreaded, flat spin. Regardless the crew ejected safely. I remember everyone in F-14 training at the time was very disturbed by this incident. We were told the F-14 would not spin, and now we learned that was wrong. (Talking to Adm. Pettigrew last year who was the technical advisor for the movie, he said Bean’s accident and another similar one led to that part of the movie script. Originally the scene was supposed to have been a mid-air collision but the Navy did not like that so they changed it to a flameout and a flat spin for the scene, which then was OK with the Navy.) In the F-14A with that particular engine, almost any disturbed air entering it would often cause a compressor stall. Even without flying behind someone’s jet wash, the engine would often stall with a very hard turn at low airspeed and high angle of attack. It was not uncommon for me during a week of Air Combat Maneuvering (ACM) training to have a number of compressor stalls. Usually I was able to just clear them and resume, however sometimes to avoid “over-temping” the engine I had to shut it down. Of course sometimes, the engine just totally quit and shut down by itself at a high angle of attack. That engine caused a number of flat spins. I lost a good friend, squadron mate, and RIO in one: Lt William (Bill) C. "Shadow" Matthews. The forward transverse G-forces made it unable in the flat spin to eject. Also the scene of Goose hitting the canopy was based on an actual incident, but I cannot remember who the RIO was. Related: Top Navy plane found plagued with fatal spin F-14 design cure set at $78 million [Note: While this article says the F-14 controls were a problem - which they were somewhat - the real problem was losing one engine while both were in full afterburner which happens. The great asymmetric yaw that resulted caused the aircraft to ‘couple-up’, depart controlled flight, and then go right into a flat spin.] I would like to know if this is simulated in our F-14 sim with the F-14a if we were to be following closely behind another aircraft and get into its jetwash?