SDsc0rch

i certainly hope they do! JHMCS / datalink / radar / full HOTAS functionality (see non-nuc wpns manual from '95 that's floating around the internet...)

i'll keep flying FC3 because the F-15C is an FC3 aircraft i'm not going to "flock" to DCS-level a/c just because they're "DCS-level" -- if its a kickass jet, i'll fly it - DCS or FC3 ---- and if its a booger, DCS or FC3, i'll leave it alone but if i had my preference, it would be DCS ---- DCS means to me.. "simulation" FC3 is closer to.. "game"

just an observation... people mention making a particular aircraft an "FC3" aircraft but, its my understanding that ED isn't going to be making FC-level aircraft anymore - any new a/c are to be made to the DCS standard (maybe lower-grade flight model, granted - but still not FC3)

sounds good thx for answering

hahahahaa this post made my day : )

well.. yeah! they did all the research to get all the details and specs already - why wouldn't they try to transfer over as much as possible from one project to the other unless.. is there something wrong with the fsx/tacpack version?? (honest question)

here's a question... in the multiplayer interface we are currently unable to edit or modify the given waypoints can that ever be changed in the future?? somehow give us even limited access to the mission editor in the multiplayer interface so we can plan routes and make navigation easier -- and, maybe the next logical step.. SOMEday it sure would be nice to have a "mission commander" position available to edit and task air units in the multiplayer environment like CA, but for air thx, ED : )

58-in panny (see sig) running at 1440p fps at 4k doesn't cut it for me - i can keep a solid 60fps (with some dips, granted) at 1440

the missiles when will the missiles be fixed (there IS a segment of the population that wants an AIR COMBAT SIMULATION) pretty please - thank you

ps.. just joking - having fun 8)

something about the environment ----- it always looks so BLUE my memory of nevada is its much more "yellow" am i way off here? what does everybody else say?? ==edit== also want to say.. "thankyou!" i don't know of other game developers who give sneak previews like this - very much appreciated loved how it looked - its amazing also, i noticed the afterburners - looking better!! : ) the HDR effect inside the cockpit as the sun comes in to view - wow! the sheer number of objects is.. astounding ---- and there didn't seem to be any stuttering or slow-downs at all - fantastic

number one ------ THANK YOU wow, that was really great feedback -- difficult to hear you

c'mon! its easy what happened! superior western technology!! 8)

howabout for the IRST?? clouds, haze, angle of the sun.. etc will degrade IRST operation -- would like to see a bit more fidelity in modeling these effects : )

also, don't forget this.. at SOME POINT it will go on sale but you gotta be patient - just like everything else, it will *eventually* go on sale - if you don't want to pay forty bucks, you gotta wait - if you don't want to wait.. pony up the coin! imma gonna be buying it "day one" : )

"post combustors" : )

sensational! haha

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3123378/A-city-lockdown-Tigers-lions-bears-wolves-hippo-loose-Georgia-s-capital-Tbilisi-freak-flood-killed-eight-leaves-dozens-dangerous-zoo-animals-roaming-city-s-streets.html sounds severe...

two good books on the subject... http://www.amazon.com/Red-Eagles-Americas-General-Aviation-ebook/dp/B004X7533K and http://www.amazon.com/Scream-Eagles-Dramatic-Account-Fighter/dp/0743497244 i've got them both - a lotta good stuff in there (note - the first one is very "documentary" ---- a lot of data, not very enjoyable reading - actually had a hard time pushing through - second one is much more enjoyable) this one "may" be good - it looks interesting, but i haven't read it.. http://www.amazon.com/Americas-Secret-MiG-Squadron-CONSTANT/dp/1849089760

good point yeah - i'd like to have the "data" that comes from an AWACS (so you can feed that to LOTatc) but keep the comms muted or....... even have a separate volume control like we have with the RWR

fantastic read! i'm glad we got "several" FSU a/c to glean intel from - and in fact fight against i'm also glad that the big wheels of the bureaucratic process over there deemed it more important to protect their national pride than to take seriously the lessons gleaned from the western technology dropped in to their laps

@eddie - thx for providing this downloading - looking fwd to going through it : ) ==EDIT== wow - this is really great! i'm just skimming through it and i see they are covering topics that i would not even hint at for fear of crossing a line one can only hope that we eventually get to see even just a few of these concepts modeled in DCS again, fantastic doc and thx for sharing! : )

WHAT EDDIE SAID by the way, just to show you just a little bit about the kind of information "out there" take a look at tactics and techniques of electronic warfare in vietnam (amazon) the bibliography is full of declassified (S) and even some (TS) source material boom! i have this book and i was amazed - i've never seen such material posted publicly before ==EDIT== well for petes sake.. would you look at that! PDF you don't even have to buy it.............. lol

aka.. the BANE of my existence!!

thankyou for the update wags : ))