

razo+r
Members-
Posts
12780 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by razo+r
-
Nein, das RADAR. Die IFF-Antennen sind unbeweglich und bewegen auch nichts auf einem Display. IFF-Antennen sind nur für die IFF-Anfragen gedacht. Dann musst du das RADAR in die richtige Position bewegen. Du hast ja zwei Zahlen beim Cursor und eine bei dem roten/grünen Kontakt (welche via Datenlink zu dir gesendet wurde). Stelle sicher dass die Höhe von diesem Kontakt zwischen den Höhen vom Cursor sind und dann solltest du den Kontakt auch mit dem Bordeigenen RADAR finden. Dann geht wohl der Kontakt aus deinem Suchvolumen vom RADAR heraus.
-
The F-15E also has seperate buttons for Radio 1 and Radio 2. They might have different keybinds or not pre-assigned at all, so look for anything PTT and Comm related.
-
Ich nehm mal an F-18? Hast du die Antenne richtig ausgerichtet (vertikal)?
-
Can you upload a short track? Otherwise it is impossible to tell what you might have done wrong.
-
A log is useless in this case, a track is needed. Do you have easy comms enabled? Have you used the corresponding radio PTT button? What fraction was the ATC/Airfield?
-
I guess you are specifically talking about Air to Air engagement, right?
-
Either reselect the bomb and resave the mission or click on the orange triangle in the loadout menu to customize the fuze and appearance.
-
Tunguska does not capture targets via radar monitor
razo+r replied to Altair89's topic in Bugs and Problems
It works fine with guns but not when the missile is selected, even well within 4km. -
Sorry for the late ping but I finally managed to try it out myself. I can force RWY 31 to be active by giving it the proper wind, like 310/10 (meteo) for example. So there is absolutely no need for tailwind and I suspect you just didn't set the wind speed strong enough. DCS is behaving weird at lower wind speeds. With this wind, RWY 31 is active. However, if I tune to the ILS with 108.9, I do get the identifier but no indications. ILS 26 works though. So I guess you did indeed find a bug.
-
Tunguska does not capture targets via radar monitor
razo+r replied to Altair89's topic in Bugs and Problems
Some details would have been cool I guess, like for example saying that tracking works with guns but not with missiles. -
Should be doable but quite cumbersome I can imagine.
-
Botched the landing big time but nothing from RIO
razo+r replied to greyseal494's topic in DCS: F-14A & B
Hard to tell with no information. -
Autostart only works with full fidelity modules since for FC (At least FC3 aircraft), RShift+Home (And of course also turning on the power with RShift+L) does start the engines and you don't need to do anything else.
-
George Washington isn't free, it's part of the Super Carrier, which is why you spawn in the air and not on the carrier. The free ones are the Forrestal and the Vinson.
-
Also make sure you remove all mods and run a repair. One specific mod, which I cannot remember anymore, prevented carriers from ever appearing in a mission.
-
Your attached picture doesn't show.
-
Make sure the airfield belongs to your coalition, has gunners in it's warehouse and that you are within the service zone of the airport. Which mission is that?
-
1) Nö glaube nicht. 2) Einfach nach links lehnen, mehr gibts da nicht zu tun.
-
Why don't you upload a short track so people can see if you are missing something or you found a bug...
-
Das macht bei dir das @? Meine Güte diese vielen Tastaturlayouts sind kompliziert...
-
ED removed the ST version in the last update.
-
@ Kannst du mit kopieren oder AltGr+2 machen... Nach dem @ den Nutzernamen eingeben und auswählen und dann gibts den blauen Rahmen
-
There is no clear yes/no answer to that. Explosion might be unlikely, but it can still set you on fire. And it could also cause catastrophic damage, or not. There are so many variables at play here, wire thickness, aircraft type and construction, fuel load, weapon load, speed etc.
-
Fair enough. Can you tell us what wind you set and the strength? Sometimes DCS can be weird if the wind is not strong enough, like for example 2-5 kts wind setting. It is better to land into the wind for performance reason but sometimes due to operational reasons landing with a tailwind is acceptable and prefered. And to be honest, if you want to land with headwind so much, just do an ILS followed by a circling. As for selectable runways, perhaps that will be available in a few decades when ED has overhauled the ATC system.
-
"Nav wind" as far as I know is wind coming from, so it would be headwind. Either way, some slight tailwind is and can be acceptable as long as it is within the airframe and performance limitations.