razo+r

Do you have DLSS/DLAA turned on? That's what's causing ghosting.

You can already do both in the form of the tragic Yak-52 that's available.

From my flying previously, at lower altitudes, leaving the oil cooler and intercooler at 50% is fine, intercooler can even remain closed. One thing you should check is Cowl Flaps. I had to adjust them constantly not to overheat or undercool the engine. Also feel free to upload a track showing a seizing engine of yours so we can pinpoint exactly where the issue was.

Was genau meinst du den? Es gibt nur eine F-15C, und die kann nur Luft-Luft, sie hat keine AG-Funktionalität.

It starts exactly with this as you can then argue, we got X, which is not accurate, for the F-18, when do we get Y, which would also be not accurate. Mounting it is one thing, employing it is the other thing. And no, you cannot just copy the avionics of the A-10C2 over. You are also requesting time travel to put a 2012 weapon into the year 2005, that's my reasoning, which is also your reasoning with the mission example. It doesn't force you to play like I would. It forces you to play like you would, with a GBU-54 on an F-18. Like I said, arguments like these can be dragged into infiinity. ED is modelling a specific timeframe. If they wouldn't, they would have to implement various updates and changes and other things. That way the amount of work gets absolutely bloated. Just live with their decision of the F-18 being a 2005 aircraft.

ED has already made it's mind about that. You can see it at the tags they gave the topic: They have to decide at some point which features to implement and which not, otherwise it could be dragged into infinity. 1) If we would get the GBU-54, we probably would have gotten a 2012 F-18 and not a 2005 one, right? 2) Having a 2005 plane in 1989 is just as unrealistic as having a 2012 introduced weapon in 2005. This argument goes both ways. 3) While technically correct, if you don't want it don't use it, I find it a very bad argument. If you want the GBU-54, just get the A-10C2. If you want the GBU-54 on the F-18, just play a different game. You don't have to use DCS. It's just such a ridiculous argument to make in my opinion. It's the same as with the Swiss single AIM-120 launcher. It doesn't hurt anyone having it. The F-18 can carry it but it's the wrong version of what ED is trying to simulate, just like the LJDAM is the wrong weapon/period for the simulated F-18.

Because, just like in the A-10C, this was the original way to change the laser code of the weapon before the new Fuze Menu feature was introduced.

Wenn ich die Mission probiere, sagt der JTAC immer "Ohne Markierung". Also hab ich mal meine eigene Mission gebastelt und dort funktioniert LST tadellos. Hast du den LST switch auch auf "AN"? Kannst du mal einen Track hochladen?

Can you perhaps upload your mission so we can take a look? Can you show how you set up the frequency with all the advanced waypoint action? And why does it need to be two in the same group? Why not just copy the tanker?

Now with the PTO it seems to go somewhat into that direction of historical accurate matchups. And we get the La-7, not La-5. But besides that, there were plans about a different variant of the A8. But just like the AI 109G6 that was planned to come, I think it's safe to say as of now, it's just too much work/absolutely not a priority. I too would love some more axis aircraft, but if you look at the grand schemes of things, it's gonna take another decade probably before we see anything in that regard.

Wird das Ziel auch vom Laser und nicht vom IR-Pointer anvisiert? Stimmt der Code vom Laser und deinem ATFLIR überein? Kannst du die Mission oder einen kurzen Track hochladen?

Sollte schon gehen, sind einfach zwei verschiedene Einstellungen. Das eine in den Spezialoptionen betreifft lediglich die Beschriftung im Cockpit, das andere, die Avionik-Sprache die... Naja, eben die Avionik.

2,6 klingt ein bisschen früh, idealerweise so spät wie Möglich, also 0,6 warten oder zumindest bis RDY blinkt. Aber gerne mal einen Track hochladen für mehr Infos.

I'm sorry if you did do it in your track. I am currently away from my computer so I cannot check your track as of now. Just to make sure, after he sais advise when ready etc. for some reason, you have to wait a good few seconds before you reply. If you reply too quickly, he will ignore it. So wait like 5-10 seconds before replying, then he should continue as usual.

Noch nie gehabt, noch nie davon gehört. Wenn es wieder passiert, kannst du einen kurzen Track hochladen? Und zur Sicherheit, INS ist hochgefahren und bereit?

Do you have any mods installed? If yes, try removing them, run a repair and see if that fixed it.

What is he saying and how far do you come in the dialogue?

Oil cooler closed sounds very suspicious. Either way, check your temps. You cannot keep the coolers closed if you eventually overheat your engine.

Well, for a starter, you would likely have to model them in blender/3ds first. After that, you have to give them some collision model so you don't fall through. And then, you can use either existing invisible FARPs for resupply, or try coding it as a FARP directly. However it seems like there is a size limit. If you make it too big you might get weird shadows. There's also someone who built a ramp for DCS, so if you experience weird glitches with the collision model, perhaps that ramp has something special, if you need guidance.

4.5 years since this topic, but not since the whole ATC topic started, which is much longer ago. So either stop caring, or keep counting. And since you already revive this topic from it's everlasting grave: Incorrect. You are being given the distance to the point. By flying an exact speed, you can convert that to TAS, or if you know the wind, which fortunately in DCS is written out and on the whole map exactly the same, you get your GS, with which you can calculate how long you have to fly to reach that point. There's literally a stopwatch in every aircraft for that.

Also note that AI fixed wing (don't know about helicopters) cannot spawn on ground, they can only spawn on a designated spot or in the air. If you want that aircraft to spawn on ground, set the skill level to "Client" or "Player".

A track file is a mission file with the track data. It can still be opened with the mission editor, you just have to switch the file format from ".miz" to ".trk" when you click on "open mission" or whatever it is called in the editor.

Anywhere you want, you just have to find it easily. And how to use it is described in the very first post. Add a trigger and the do script action.

Es gibt einen Kopf links an der Seitenleiste mit einer Liste der Triggerzonen.

You reduce power, which in turn will slow you down, less lift, nose goes down, aircraft starts to descend. If you increase power, the aircraft will start to climb. Or you use the elevators to pitch down and reduce the power a bit so you don't pitch up again.