Motomouse

I prefer the 442 studio drivers, if it is only for the feeling, I can not see any disadvantages. Do you really need the high quality settings of the nvidia driver? I prefer high performance settings.

95% GPU is ok, no need to turn something down

Thanks for RWR clarification, thought I am in the F-18 forum, sorry.

A 2080Ti is about 30% faster than a 1080Ti. 3080Ti is leaked to have about 40% over the 2080Ti. 1.) In this case a 3080Ti only achieves about 180% performance of a 1080Ti. I expect at least 200% improvement. 2.) There were rumors that Nvidia is aiming for lower prices than the 2000 series (7 nanometers cards are cheaper to produce). Recently there are rumors the price will further increase. I want at least 200% more performance for less from my next GPU. Because I have lots of fun already on my current hardware. Else I wait for next gen or competitors offers.

When the missle is in the blind spots of the RWR no warning is given.

I miss my broken Reverb. But enjoy flying in my Rift no less. I always thought I will buy a 3000 series Nvidia asap. But if it is too expensive or too slow I will just continue to fly in low fidelity for high FPS. The recent leaks and infos on the upcoming Nvidia offereings are not that promising. I expect at least 200% 1080ti performance for less $ than a 2080. Otherwise I will pass.

And there are a lot of meanings to his post as well. :-) But I finally think he is really talking about a stick and a throttle setup.

100% rendering, no AA, terrain (and cockpit) shadows only is good for 60FPS in all cases. Without mentioning settings performance statements are meaningless.

Yes, I also had problems with different rendering in the left and right eye in the Reverb, that are not present in the Rift. (This is not about the clouds error that is visible in both headsets).

Not true, I had no problems to play at 60FPS at all times with my (currently broken) Reverb on a 3600X and a 1080Ti and performance oriented settings.

Just had my first harrier flight with the new setup. This rig is harrier cheat mode :-)))

I love the gunfighter MCG combo and will buy the base modul of the throttle asap. I have no need for button boxes in VR but I like the modular design for those that need them.

Where is the VR pilot? Busy flying the F-18.

Flicking the virtual buttons in the airplane is preferred by me in VR. But a nice throttle is an asset and one day I will look for an update to my Saitek one. But "Super Taurus" is just too much for me. How about "Manly Calf Throttle" or just "Full Throttle". "Super Taurus" sounds like something shady advised via spam mail, not like a serious simming toy. ;-)

raise the gear ;-)

20cm is plenty and I had to change to my 5cm lower desk to get the stick at about the height of a hornet stick with the long monstertech desk mount. But that allows me to use my higher desk again as regular desk and I was ready for this move in advance. (I am using a car chair with a fixed height not an office chair.) I think I would recommend the 10cm for most people to achieve a higher precision. But I like also helicopters and warbirds, so I really appreciate the even longer 20cm extension and it lives up to my expectations easily. Also no problem to mount the s-curve extension straight and the grip at an ergonomic angle.

Nice combo with these pedals as well :-)

Long table mount arrived one day early :-)

VKB One grip to rule them all I have no need for an adapter for my uncomfortable broken TM Cougar stick because I will stick to my MCG, such a joy and versatility :-)

First time? Really.

Just installed the 20cm extension with #40 springs an did and did an arial refuel in the hornet and some hoovering in the huey. This is another level of simming. Magnificent.

6 DOF pilot head shadows would be a great addition for VR and immersion. 6 DOF pilot head rendering would also be a nice feature for communication.

Thanks a lot!

Now I think I am lucky I went with product of a competitor.

Check SteamVR resolution settings, perhaps an update increased the base rendering size.