Hobel

can you upload a track? with these parameters, the best tip for now is not to use loft mode Shrike-45

what kind of distances are we talking about here?

Strictly speaking, both sensors work in the same way on both aircraft for HAS/TOO in DCS. it is too precise in both planes the update time is basically the only difference here and this is not far away when it comes to the first blip. and maybe in the F18 the RWR also supports faster updating for the TOO display. The big difference to the F18 is that a nice symbol is shown over the emitter and you only have to put the TGP over it. In the F16 there is no such thing, but there is still something to point the TGP exactly enough on the target, simply place the target on the HAS page in the center of the cross and then the TGP diamond on the FPM. certainly not as pleasant as in the F18, but still possible and accurate enough. TOO/HAS only shows the emitter direction. HTS direction + distance this is a crucial difference. This is why the HTS also has to triangulate and this process takes longer than with HAS. and so you can fire the AGM-88 in one of the PB modes so that it can fly a LOFT profile and you have to do that in the F18 with the TGP to determine the distance. HAS has no LOFT modes. Maybe HAS mode is too precise and the BOX would jump a bit near the target or not be spot on, but in the end the AGM-88C sensor works the same way on both airplanes in HAS mode with only time difference as shown in the video. I think the best thing would be to build in an angular errors that could be 2-5° for the AGM-88C, that would then also affect both planes. if we assume an error of 3°, we have an uncertainty diameter circle of ~3nm at 60nm, which would still be pretty accurate. the function of the F18 is nice but the FOV of the AGM-88 is too small at the end for a reasonable overview, you get targets in the F16 even if you fly in offset and that without fiddling around with the TGP, you also have to create an MK for lofts and then shoot with PB. you can avoid this in the F16.

DTC is more or less related to this implementation, so we have to wait for more. Even though I would like it to work like it did 3 years ago until the dtc is there.

What you want is done with ccrp. There are many irl shots of the HUD, you can see how the pilots use ccrp to approach the target, just before the target the pilots press NWS to quickly switch from ccrp to ccip

Personally, I have to say yes the new INS is really really cool! but the fact that you can no longer use PRE planned jdam, or only to a very limited extent, because the JDAM GPS is still wip, really dampens the joy.

связано ли это наблюдение с этим? пример, показанный в видео, работал только в версии 2.8.1.34667.2, в текущей версии то, что вы видите в видео, больше не работает

okay i tested it again and i have to agree it seems like the radar is coming exactly from the tads

maybe and that's exactly why you need 3 skeets to destroy a tank in DCS. a hit on the engine or turret would be enough. I think that's a good compromise and many misses in DCS too. DCS could add the same missrate, but we would have a worse result than in irl because the weapons do no damage, not to mention mission kills with the current DM model. apart from that, we can hardly judge the exact miss rate on the basis of the videos, in DCS there are also a lot of misses. the best thing would be a paper documenting this exactly bg9uoI8RQKc.webm

why don't you post a track/video of it so that we can see your view. in my test the beam is coming from the Dome.

Normal thing for the F15 to track a RCS 5 target at 70nm

In DCS you need 3 skeets/BLU108 to kill a tank, I think that's a good compromise because the damage model can't simulate a lot of things CBU-97/106 there are 40 skeets, and not every one of which hits every time. and a T72 tank has a top hull armor of ~30mm, top turret ~45mm here are 2 more videos that also show how the sensor works in parts, unfortunately, as in your video, you can't see what a possible direct hit looks like

From the doc above

thx. looking

This has nothing to do with the topic and is also misleading. The Radar Simulator from RB has already proven how authentic it is, just because it didn't work some time doesn't mean it was or is bad

Look here https://forum.dcs.world/topic/349673-agm-45-shrike-quick-guide-by-klarsnow-updated-june-5th-2024/?do=findComment&comment=5467470

Help me out with an aspect, there is also talk of the PK and a Miss Distance(m), up to 24 meters. among others: 9m 1PK 14m 0.5PK and so on so 100% lethal at 9m and 50% lethal at 14m. so the Proxy Fuze should be much bigger or more dynamic. Are they probably referring to this as well? APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA379702 https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA509688

Have you noticed the new notes? I think it was partly 30kg less

Serious question in what way, the fact that not all contacts have an alt display, the SA goes away...and every time I select a contact I have to press the mfd button for AUTO or when searching, back to MAN...horrible

I started with the F18 and then with the F16 and realised that the F16 is much lighter. Just the fact that F16 saves the pages and doesn't reset them every time... It's also much clearer and simpler a/a a/g. With their F18, sometimes double or triple the amount of input is necessary to trigger an action compared to the F16

Well you see, that's enough for now if you keep looking you'll find more. To be on the safe side. There are enough public documents to model modern sensors well and plausibly. See F15/m2000. If it were up to me I wish we had razbam's radar modulation for all weapons and aircraft.

There are enough public sources to confirm this. If you really want to know, try Google, the answer will come to you quickly.

Watch the video and you'll see everything you need to know. I read the approximate range with the RWR, from the last "junp" that the symbol makes I can deduce to be about 30nm away from the emitter source, the max range for the wrcs, then I point the nose to the emitter using the FD, at the same time the wrcs also shows me the distance, bottom left next to the ADI, then press pickle and hold, now I pull the nose up for a loft, the wrcs then automatically shoots the Shrike-45 with the correct parameters. https://youtu.be/mZ3-ZO6xspw

If the option works, it could be interesting in conjunction with the harm, as the POS modes are still not implemented, this could cause crazy scenarios.