epoch

The module is available in both open beta and stable versions. It was released into the stable version yesterday. Changelog.

How on earth can this be [Correct as is]? This isn't a real life jet. It's a representation of the HUD, in 2D, in a video game. Everyone's experience is different, and the ability to make something readable in-game without having to mess about in .lua files would be most helpful.

Ah, I never noticed this option. Does exactly what I need. Thanks for the info.:thumbup:

Could have have an option to remove the stick like we do in some other modules?

Generally it's good sense to check that a product meets your requirements before paying for it.

Don't you mean "This is 2020 and people like to find reasons to be offended"? :music_whistling: In all seriousness, the OPs request is reasonable. A lot of games nowadays offer deep character customisation, but it tends to be baked into the game from the outset. But bear in mind the roots of DCS go way back so it's probably not so easy to facilitate. But some statement from ED perhaps putting this onto a future development roadmap would hopefully make some people happy.

There's expected to be an open-beta release today, so perhaps the accompanying changelog might provide the enlightenment you require?

Yeah, but we're in the Wishlist forum. So sure, Caucasus can't be installed. But some people wish it could be. Personally, I never play on that map. Absolutely hate it. I'm not short of disk space, but for sure it would be nice to be able to reduce this game's footprint.

Welcome to your new job ELMO. Here's your uniform..

Which statement?

Hang on. Please correct me if I've missed the point here: Literally nobody asked about SVG. They asked about missing features and bug fixes for a module surreptitiously hauled out of EA and into a 'feature complete' state. And now, because you're apparently delivering on bug fixes this causes a delay in other work. So it's all our fault? smh

You misunderstood me, but that's ok.

Not 100% sure I understand you. However, bear in mind that you have no business relationship at all with Razbam. You are not a customer of Razbam. You have no contract with Razbam, and they owe you no obligations at all. Your relationship is with Eagle Dynamics, from whom you purchased the module (or Steam, if relevant). Regarding support, the ED forums cannot be considered an "official" customer support portal. If they were, the moderators would not be able to ban anyone because that would be denying customers the ability to receive support. That's why the ticketing system is the official support portal, and the forums are just for us to write walls of text in vain attempts to prove each other wrong! :lol:

I love the Harrier. Have done since day 1. Sure, it's not up to scratch compared to other modules, but it's still a blast. And there's nothing like trying to land on the Tarawa, at night, in bad weather (current lighting issues notwithstanding). Actually, if you based your buying decision on the published product specifications, that turned out to be untrue, then this is likely not Consumer Rights Act territory. You are in fact asserting that you entered into a contract (of sale) with a third party (ED) and that you were misled into doing so (product specs untrue). That's covered by the Misrepresentation Act (1967). I'm guessing you're in the UK so if you're dead set on going legal, then in the first instance you should speak to your local council's Trading Standards Office. I suspect though that you would need to seek redress directly from ED via your own legal representation. Enjoy! In reality you probably won't get anywhere, and will spend more than your initial outlay on the product. Who put that crab there?

^^^ This. Jabbers and Wags videos are great, but RedKite just nails it every time.

Not sure about the OP, but it seems Rudel_chw wants to gift modules he's already bought which the dedicated server release has rendered no longer required. In his case I'd suggest opening a support ticket and asking. It'll probably be a no, but it's worth asking. I mean, it's just a licence to a product which could easily be moved from one account to another. Even charging a small 'reassignment' fee would be a fair compromise.

My buddy and I were flying around Damascus and we noticed two trains approaching each other. They were sharing the same track. Instead of colliding there merely passed through each other. Not sure if this is Syria specific or a larger scale defiance of the laws of physics in DCS, but I thought I'd mention it anyway.

Typo in video title. Should be 'damn'. :music_whistling:

What he said ^^^ Thanks df! This was most unexpected!

In what way would releasing something with unknown stability into something supposedly stable be sensible? I'm not taking the mickey. Just genuinely interested your thought process.

Looking forward to this map. The level of detail is astonishing, and the cities look great. Fantastic work by Ugra Media. Great news re. Cyrpus too. One minor issue spotted: a building embedded into the road at 07:26. Probably not a cause for concern unless moving ground units through that area.

BIGNEWY can you answer the question fully please? Or at least state that you do not know the answer. I'm sure you don't want to be responsible for providing misleading information, so some clarification would be helpful. Thanks in advance.

Mirage 2000 moves too iirc. Essential for landing due to high AoA.

Just put this on repeat while you wait. :thumbup:

Be patient. The changelog was no doubt posted before the updates have replicated around the CDN. Check this link. Once the current openbeta version changes to 2.5.6.52196 then the update should be available.