Knock-Knock

What exactly is the problem? Everything is in the right place here (latest OB). I tried full screen (1920x1080) and windowed (1600x900) with GUI scale 1 and 1.5.

Am I understanding this weeks newsletter correct, that all modules will be free to try for an entire month? Not two days, but an entire month? https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=4290405#post4290405 That is very large of you, thank you :thumbup:

I have nothing to add to the discussion, I just want to thank you for that link :thumbup:.

So we just stop posting bugs, is that your game plan?

Thanks for these videos, Naked :thumbup:. I hope they will increase their range even further, cause these things had quite the reach. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_searchlights_of_World_War_II

Can see in your screenshots there too, that the simulation frametime explodes in 2.5.6. 6.6ms in 2.5.5 vs 36.2ms in 2.5.6, for certain missions.

The new Jester BVR / Radar keybinds. A Radar Range CW / CCW option, to avoid having to map 6 keybinds.

Im glad to see its acknowledged :thumbup:. Hope they find the culprit soon, cause 2.5.6 performance is really frustrating in some/most unit intensive missions. From where Im sitting, its definitely something that cuts the legs of the CPU. Its not a GPU / render problem. CPU is chewing on something simulation something that wasnt the case in 2.5.5, and some situations are a lot worse than others. And its not a VR problem, we are just more sensitive to performance loss in VR.

Afaik its the render resolution of the targetpod/maverick/shkval viewports, along with mirror render resolution. So increasing this, or running it each frame vs every other frame will have an effect on fps. But its of course relative to where you look and what you look at, and if you have TPOD+Maverick screens up, along with mirrors on etc.

Thanks :thumbup:

I dont know the answer, but I went sniffing earlier when I saw the mention of real beam, and as I understand it, Real beam is a unprocessed real time raw radar return, which has fairly low resolution. Id imagine enough to detect a ship though. Looks like what the Viggen produces Id say. RBGM is a Real Beam return. DBS is a Doppler Beam Sharpening SAR, dont think the APG 73 has this?

The new standard of bug reports: Busted, fix it.

Well, guess the EA wasnt a typo: Quote lifted from here: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4287662&postcount=105

Awsome! Not gonna miss this, thank you. :thumbup: - That would be 00.30 Central European Time, for those wondering.

I hope we will get more resolution than displayed in that single old screenshot, cause Id assume that the 73 is more capable than the APG 63 in A/G, and judging by these images it had quite good resolution, at least when right on top and best case scenario, but still. Jump to 9m 19sec:

From here: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=269757 Well we are a little wiser now, and dont need to pace around waiting for the initial "The P-47D is far along and will be released at a completed state in Q1 2020." statement. Dont care about the date so much, more wondering about the change from completed state to EA. Or is that just a typo, the EA?

Yaha, and I havent even pre-purchased into it. Im just sitting up here in the window trying to make sense of it all.

Im so confused. The news about the Super Carrier that was suddenly announced to be announced later today, has now been postponed to tomorrow morning, Minsk time - the already published date of a hopeful Super Carrier release?

It's oh so quiet Shh shh It's oh so still Shh shh You're all alone Shh shh And so peaceful until

This one does: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=3607054

This is a great mod, thank you. I love intercepting the P-3 in the MiG-21 and just escort it out of the area again.

The performance gain comes into play in polygon heavy scenes. Say on the carrier with lots of static aircraft, there I get better performance with it set to 'true' for example.

I think its just a matter of FlyingIron asking for one, when the day arrives where they want a sub forum.

Are you a shareholder?

I would like to see them release it in their own way in their own time.