Knock-Knock

Works here, Open Beta, as late as yesterday. Im using RCTRL+RSHIFT+ numpad / and * though.

Full fidelity MiG-29, MiG-35, Su-27, Su-33, Su-34, Su-57, Dassault Rafale, Eurofighter Typhoon, JAS 39 Gripen, F-15X, F-22 Raptor, F-35 JSF.

Wow.....

I prefer the New Sound. Much closer to my expectations of how it would sound in the cockpit.

Thank you :thumbup:

Does anybody have a invite link for the DCS Discord that is being mentioned here and there? I have been unable to find a functioning link, or find the server/channel trough Discords own search.

Oh, well that limitation sucks. Yea those buildings, bridges, railways, rail yards, runways, shelters, ME placed statics, all need a status that can be stored. Would open so many possibilities for mission builders, especially for multiplayer.

I dont think a snapview will work, since it doesnt store VR orientation, only location. I know of no way to archive this, except by using a swivel chair to help look around.

A Mk 84 or GBU-31 will make life miserable for a player, if the player drives trough the crater at relative high speed. I would drop either on a given runway, and then land on it. As soon as I ran over the crater, my plane would explode. That was F-14, F-18 and F-5's I tried with.

Excuse me Sir... Sir. You forgot this Sir.

So thats your definition of highly requested? 4 forum members in a one year life span.

Its the Syria map.

Now https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/shop/modules/viper/

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3923003&postcount=5

Syria map and Persian Gulf as far as I can tell.

And your ignorance is mind-boggling.

A-4 Skyhawk pilot J.R. Starch gives us a walkaround of both the A-4 and TA-4 models. These aircraft are some amazing airplanes and have one of the fastest roll rates. - 59 minutes long

Roger roger.. and thank you for the early heads up :thumbup:

Ive always thought the Falcon name was quite fitting though, and it wasnt until I roamed the halls of DCS, that I came across the Viper name. Initially I thought some of the later blocks were called Viper.

I am very glad to hear this, thank you :thumbup:

Like the Warthog, I mean, Thunderbolt II? Im a fan of the Fighting Falcon name too, but Im really not bothered by it being called Viper as forum title.

One part where I think the A-10C really shines, is in its HOTAS/system control design. Its so intuitive and clever once you know it, and you never (or rarely) take your hands off in combat. F-18 and Harrier dont shine in this way, they are much more DDI/MFD heavy, and you have to be hands of a lot more. So, where does the 16 slot in this aspect? As clever as the A-10C, or more like the McDonnell guys?

These days they ought to be called U.R.O. Unidentified Rendered Objects.

2D/3D artist tend to squeeze a few percent over their budget, and each model becomes the new standard. Just natural evolution :). Size doesnt matter, complexity does. But cockpit complexity wise the F-16 looks rather similar to the F-18, so I wouldnt expect much difference.