MAXsenna

Nothing. I did enjoy that helicopter SAR server, and I dable into other servers from time to time. Not at all interested in joining any squads, because I fly whenever I feel like it, without constraints and commitments. MP can be lots of fun. My first experiences were EF2K, some DI and Janes games over Kali, before IP was widely supported. Yeah, and FPSs like Doom, Descent, Nukem 3D, some Starwars etc. But that was way back in the 90s. There was a warbirds game that supported IP and only MP. The name escapes me, and was subscription based, so I gave that up very quickly. After the 90s I was a console user for 10+ years, and played a lot of MP with my X. But we had multiple TVs and consoles. Spent countless hours in MP on some PS3 game pleasing her I can't remember. Some FPS something. I have nothing against MP, and I will probably eventually come back to it. But I have too much fun learning all the modules in SP. [emoji4] Cheers! Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

The first cut is the deepest....

No problem! Just post them here in this thread at your convenience, and I'm sure it will be resolved in not time! Enjoy your shift and welcome to the forum!

@Melt-Down Just saw this too! Love your username, read it as "melt down in DCS wishlist".

Seriously! You've had it for a month, and you ask for help now, when it's working for everyone else? I don't intend to be harsh, because I truly deeply know how frustrating it is when something doesn't work. But calling it a bad module when it's obviously a problem in your end, that's just bad style. Apologies! Post screenshots of your bindings and your F-4E Special settings. Ie. LWin+LShft+S, (not with your phone), and your DCS.log. DCS\logs under Saved Games. Also. NEVER re-install. A full repair is much quicker, and does the same thing. It will not touch Saved Games though. So any problems/corruptions that are there will not be repaired. A quick test is just to rename the DCS folder under your saved games, after a repair, and you have a plain vanilla installation. You could actually try to rename it now, in case you have any conflicting mods. Cheers, and best of luck! Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

It's a suggestion. And I have complained before to ED that they should change the text, and NOT suggest Google. @NineLine @BIGNEWY About time to change it now, ain't it? Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Ouch! I misunderstood. I thought you meant the post where ED clarified and debunked Enigmas claims. My bad. Cheers! Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

You put a link to it from a file sharing service like Google Drive or Microsoft Onedrive. Cheers!

A few posts up really. Enigma has become critical of DCS and just fine and totally understandable, while it doesn't make him omniscient of how ED works ans their plans. Cheers!

BS! Probably be true for you though. I remember flying the EF2K and others over Kali in ≈96/97. Lots of fun it was.

According to PC the Kiowa will never be on trial nor sales due to the licensing agreement. Pretty sure it will change down the line at some point though.

Sorry, missed that part. [emoji1] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Turn down the world volume slider? Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Ah, there you have it. DCS does NOT support curves and changes to saturation with FFB. Well known issue. Cheers! Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Absolutely! Totally! Let's hope they read this, and have had a good look at BeyondATC!

Yeah, I can imagine! [emoji1] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

@twistking I have to agree with SharpeXP here. Give me a better more realistic ATC which I can speak to along with EWR, AWACS, JTAC and wingmen in the near future! I'll be very happy and dream about your proposal! [emoji1] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

They just use the Microsoft Speech Recognition included in Windows, like VoiceAttack/(VAICOM), but they use AI to "restructure" the speech-to-text, in case you say something in the incorrect order. Right now that's all we need in DCS in my opinion. And @SharpeXB is correct of course, they only need to use it for ATC. But that shouldn't stop us from giving commands to wingmen/JTAC in DCS. Hell, we can even do it now. But it's limited to exact commands limited by how VoiceAttack functions. Maybe VoiceAttack will include some sort of AI down the line. Then we're golden. Sort of. None of this will work until ED has fixed the overall AI in the game. And we can already do that by now with VAICOM, except you need to say the correct commands perfectly. That's where we need the AI like they've done in BeyondATC. I have no need to strike up conversations, but have the AI "understand" me in stressful situations. Maybe I'm missing your point, but what more do you really need? Cheers!

Have you tried this? All flight axis back to normal/default. In the controls settings click the Moza column, then click the FBB tune button on the bottom. Then check the Y axis reverse checkbox. Cheers!

Not using FFB by chance? Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Did you read the post above your? [emoji848] You can basically use any, even opened sourced which won't store any of your personal info. [emoji6] Cheers! Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

I really hope the first part of your post is where we're going! To my knowledge BeyondATC runs locally, and is pretty much a "free flow", though you can't crack jokes with it. Cheers!

He never mentioned "balance", he specifically wrote consistency, and in this context it means that it should be on the same level of "reality" across all the modules. You are of course correct about the documentation. Cheers! Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Great catch! [emoji1303] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Well, if the parts were purchased separately they could potentially be installed/uninstalled individually. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk