Recoil16

Looks like your Andersen chart is missing the center taxiway as taxiway Charlie.

Again, I'm not seeing this behavior, for me the radar altimeter seems to indicate correctly, I've now tried in multiple different locations. Without a track this will be hard to diagnose.

This is a somewhat complicated issue. Assuming that the aircraft are operating as one flight, they should in fact be allowed to backtrack together, so this issue shouldn't even come up. If however the aircraft are either not operating together as a flight or are too large or too numerous to do a backtrack together, they should be holding short of the runway holding position sign/hold short line so as to not pose a danger to the departing aircraft. This is imo the most pressing problem, because some aircraft will also taxi onto the runway and cause a collision with the departing aircraft (B-17s for example, attached). And it is not only isolated to Gecitkale. At Gazipasa for example, the next aircraft in line will be half on the runway while first aircraft is doing its takeoff run after backtracking. I think this might be an issue present at pretty much all airfields. The issue is not only present when backtracking though, even when taking off "normally", aircraft that are not part of the flight that is cleared for takeoff should be holding short of the runway holding position sign/hold short line, but currently they just roll through the line. It's a complicated problem since there is numerous different aircraft, airfields, runway configurations etc to consider, so finding a good one size fits all solution to this problem is going to be difficult. The "easiest" stop-gap solution to the problem is probably to have all aircraft hold short of the runway holding position signs/hold short line when another aircraft is on the runway, regardless of whether the aircraft are operating as a flight or not. B-17 takeoff collision gaziantep.trk

Now reported

I can't seem to replicate this, can you attach a track?

When you ask yourself that question, the answer is almost always no. And that is the case here:

The runway 06R ALSF-1 facing the wrong way is already reported.

No. Runway end lights are always red when looking at them from the runway, and green when looking at them from the approach. They do not switch colors. From the AIM, Chapter 2, Section 1:

The wind is not a factor in any of this. Runway 06R sequenced flasher direction already reported. Is the runway end light issue the same as this?

Yes, it is to my knowledge specific to the map, also reported here (with some comparisons to other maps):

When you say REIL I think you mean the runway end lights (the solid bars that are green from the one and red from the other side). REIL (runway end identifier lights) are something different, they consist of two flashing white lights on either side of the threshold, which Andersen does not have installed to the best of my knowledge. If you mean the runway end lights, then you are correct, the ones at the runway 06L threshold are currently rotated incorrectly (aside from the fact that they should be recessed in the runway), and the ones at the 24L threshold are incorrectly placed in relation to each other, since one should be able to see the red lights from the runway side and the green lights from the approach side. To my knowledge (and testing) though, all should be turned on permanently, regardless of time of day. Good catch! Couple screenshots to make the report complete: -camera 10.405645 0.163700 12.891722 -cameradir 0.993873 -0.079396 -0.076890 -camera 11.283006 0.183700 16.080704 -cameradir -0.679689 -0.129449 0.721988

Resolution of runway/taxiway signs depends on the terrain textures option, on the low option they do look bad like that. Imho taxiway signs should not be as severely affected as other textures though, because you do kinda have to be able to read them.

Please read the pinned posts when reporting issues:

You are correct, the hold short lines are flipped at all runway holding positions except when approaching runway 06L from the north on Foxtrot.

You can fly any plane you own, I'm confused as to why this is in the Bug section?

Openbeta only.

That's not what Stuka is asking for. See: Please read the pinned posts before reporting bugs.

Reproduced, issue is that the helicopter is not "linked" to the carrier in the mission editor.

The wire engagement zone mark issue is confined to the mission editor map only. In the in game F10 map and in 3D they look fine. Good catch on the parking spots.

reproduced

Also https://www.landkartenarchiv.de/tpc.php?q=tpc_k-13b

Considering there's TACANs installed at multiple airports in Georgia, I think we have a unicorn Caucasus map. Because that stuff doesn't exist.

Correct as is. Nicosia has been an abandoned field since the 70s.

IRL Nalchik has a SALS (simple approach lighting system) and a PAPI installed for runway 24 (the runway that it has ILS installed for). Sources: URMN textual (AD 2.14 Approach and Runway Lighting): http://www.caiga.ru/common/AirInter/validaip/aip/ad/ad2/rus/urmn/1-ad2-rus-urmn-txt.pdf URMN AD chart: http://www.caiga.ru/common/AirInter/validaip/aip/ad/ad2/rus/urmn/1-ad2-rus-urmn-031-031-1.pdf

That track requires the T-45. A track without mods would be nice.