Jump to content

Jester986

Members
  • Posts

    1664
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Jester986

  1. "Thats just like, your opinion man"
  2. This would be my vote. I didn't vote in the poll since there isn't an exact option. Looking forward to seeing if you can turn around the Razbam community relationhip. No snark or sarcasm intended:thumbup:
  3. I don't even want a Tornado but you all love it so much I'm rooting for you:thumbup:
  4. Thank you for the response. Sorry if that came off as rumor mongering, I certainly understand and agree with your thoughts on EA and announcing modules. Just to split a hair though my comment wasn't about trying to get you to confirm you would do module X or Y next, just that there would be continued development for DCS. Up until now the only commitment I could find was to product completion and sustainment. But I apologize if anything came off as critical and thank you for the answer. I look forward to all of heatblurs projects:thumbup:
  5. At the battle of midway carriers were lost to single hits from dive bombers. This can be attributed to unsafe storage of bombs and fuel and poor damge control. When we do Have a Pacific theatre I doubt we will have detailed damage models so I'd like to see the crew skill setting directly affecting the number of hit points a ship has. If we want a ship to have excellent luck and damage control set it veteran. If we want lucky shots and poor damge control set it to rookie.
  6. I really hope we get a torpedo bomber version as well. Hopefully there's no significant differences so its as simple as strapping the torpedo to the bottom. It would be good stand in for the Pacific map for awhile.
  7. Its managing thise seperate engines that I'm really looking forward to. The Yak, Fw A-8, and P-47 all released with indestructible(from abuse) engines. Hopefully having the merlin in game already makes it easier but I certainly understand its different from the spitfire.
  8. That would be amazing but Im still nervous about heatblur continuing to develop new modules for DCS. Since the announcement of their partnership outiside of DCS they have avoided commenting on if they will do another module or just completion/sustainment on their current ones
  9. I'd request that a condition for ea release would be having all the engine systems and damage modelled correctly. Shouldn't be hard since they already have the merlin fleshed out for the spitfire.
  10. That may be it's real specs but I've never had a problem with it giving me a head on lock.
  11. Yep, I think the problem is I remember it from am interview and can't remember where to look. I appreciate the help though. I'm pretty sure its relatively near though. Like 18 month window? But of course thats the vague recollection Diedrich mentions.
  12. Please check on the F-5 and Mig-21 then which both have all aspect and rear aspect only missles that work appropriately.
  13. I'm still confused by this. The M on the 101 should be all aspect but as kontiuka said I can only get a lock in the 3-9 aspect. The F-5 and mig-21 both have a mix of rear aspect and all aspect missles so how is this a DCS limitation? Not trying to be overly critical of Aviodev. I love the 101 but would like to see this addressed Since eventually I'll be hunting Super Tucanos in it.
  14. Hmm, I thought I had read someone saying it was in a flyable state. That would suggest more than passive development but I could be wrong.
  15. Another thing is aren't they less advanced than the M and isn't our M lacking the all aspect ability that it should have? So you if you want those to simulate older conflicts with a fictional 101 you already have the non all aspect M?
  16. Does anyone remember if this was a rough timeline on this one? Like early 2021 or late 21?
  17. I'm pro Gbu-12 but I don't see the need for this. Release it as a mod and thats fine but trying to get it in the actual module is giving the anti gbu'ers ammo in the "give an inch and take a mile" sense.
  18. I ran into this problem and couldn't figure it out for the life of me. It ended up being that I was bumping the button for the dogfight modes on my hotas. Return the radar to the normal search mode fixed it. I've also had it where I could drop mk-82s but not gbu-12s. Haven't figured that one out yet.
  19. Thanks BigNewy! I appreciateit.
  20. Is that an insult? I'm not sure exactly when they were used up or when this version of the A-10C came online but considering it Has JHMCS and APKWS Im guessing post Gulf War 1 and I believe that's wheen the 122s were used up. They likely didn't coexist and if they did it wasn't for long.
  21. They'd be nice to have but considering the entire supply was exhausted it doesn't seem reasonable to put them on.
  22. I'm happy with how ED is handling the upgrade and will most likely purchase it. Do we know an exhaustive list of features though? So far I know about APKWS, LJDAM, LMAV, HMCS, tisl deletion, uodated flight model and hotas commands. Anything I'm missing?
  23. Thanks for the update! Progress has been a little slower than ideal but you still have plenty of goodwill from me. I hope you and your team continue to develop for DCS once your current projects are complete.
  24. Would love to have it but doubt anyone will make an interceptor from that era. We have to hope for new Dev that will do it as a passion project.
  25. Our mig 21 never carried a few of its weapons. The typhoon is going to be a mix of variants. There's a few other aircraft with some fudging going on. GBU-12s are a very reasonable battlefield modification you could see to the 101 and it will help it pair nicely with the Kiowa when that releases. I hope to see them on it eventually.
×
×
  • Create New...