Jump to content

AeriaGloria

Members
  • Posts

    5880
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by AeriaGloria

  1. An axis working -6/-4/-2/-1/0/1/2/4/6/8/10? Ten positions?
  2. I’m trying to make tracts to make a bug report that it does not fit the 0.5-0.85 probability of kill given in manuals. I need atleast ten R-27 shots for this
  3. Read far enough back in this thread. You are not getting launch warning. Treat every lock as possible launch
  4. It’s only from 30-45 degrees off nose it locks only r-73. Get lock and slowly move nose away and you will likely see it eventually. That being said it seems slightly bugged this patch
  5. If modeled correctly it shouldn’t be unless in air to ground for 2-10 seconds after pre designating
  6. The SPO-15 doesn’t necessarily filter, it will shown “un-known” radars just without category, but they will have lowest priority compared to radars which are known.
  7. Nine line said they are changing this I also have bong in-accuracy and this is off topic, but you know you can correct for moving targeted with pre-designation
  8. Try it yourself! Max range is Mach 0.5-0.6 below 5 km and Mach 0.8 at 12 km. At 12 km Mach 0.8 you will be closer to 7 degrees. However max endurance is 400 kmh IAS. I believe those GAF numbers are for lower altitude (0-5 km) and are simply not saying so. Per practical aerodynamics “the most advantageous angle of attack is 4...7 depending on the altitude”
  9. Yes I agree. They were still working on vertical scan as of last patch. I expect more changes
  10. What’s wrong with DTC? But yes, I can’t see anything in LUA either Not exactly helpful but I think the default/lowest value program is best all around program anyways
  11. Your first paragraph mentioned ED understanding the document wrong and then you talk about ED’s response to Bullet’s video about the abandoned plans for external rangefinder mechanism for MiG-29. I just wanted to say I think they understood the document correctly. This “external rangefinder” is probably just Pazur anyways.
  12. SPO will still show radars it does not recognize just not categorize them and thus give them very low priority. Then there are many radars it might confuse as enemy
  13. It depends. At 25 km, your radar is scanning 2,500m +/- the deltaH you have set. At 50 km this is 5,000m +/- the delta H you have set. So it may still be in radar view, or you can use TWS so that the target is automatically locked I mean I actually like it. Only limit is -6 deltaH as max down elevation. But as I mentioned actual scan can extend far fro deltaH setting. I’m not so sure. For example I have yet to find a MiG-29 manual saying to set range with wheel. And a few including the L-18 manual say to “set range with Ku-31 target acquisition slew button.” Or they just mention setting deltaH and putting TDC where you expect target.
  14. The pilot literally has finger on trigger, they just need to flip it up to get full functionality. I don’t see how MiG could see this as a problem. Radar vertical scan max time from scanning and lock: 4.2 seconds IRST vertical scan max time for scanning and lock: 1.9 seconds
  15. The range bar also tells you you are in pursuit
  16. Manual mentions 4-7 degrees as optimal AOA. If I follow the maximum range speeds I end up with 4 degrees AOA down low and 6-7 up high
  17. The difference is radar vertical scan takes 2.2 seconds to lock and just as long to scan the whole scan zone. IRST vertical scan scans the whole zone in 0.4 seconds ands locks in 1.5 seconds
  18. Take screenshots. I make all my videos with the intention that people can take screenshots to save all the info
  19. If ED gets new info and changes the modeling in 6 months-5 years I expect an extra gift!
  20. The chart is in my video above There really aren’t many for Fulcrum “fuel flow per speed and altitude” charts, though there are more for “fuel used for climb/descent with xx payload”
  21. For those that can’t remember everything Wags says like me
  22. The centerline tank is a great design. It is essentially conformal, to the point that below Mach 0.6 it actually reduces drag. Either they didn’t test it supersonic or it has negligible drag at supersonic speed also. Pretty cool
  23. The HOTAS is really simple so really up to you this is from the manual
×
×
  • Create New...