AeriaGloria

Yes, what you mean same function? It is just anti jamming/interference mode

Either I’ve been lucky or putting the AP/AJ switch in AP has massively improved my r-27 hit rate

Sure, but please not original fc3 SPO. Just give it launch warning and be used with radar. With RSBN correction the nav system also doesn’t need fix taking, the most it will be off is about 800m but no more becuase of the constant RSBN updates.

Well what’s the question? SPO?

An axis working -6/-4/-2/-1/0/1/2/4/6/8/10? Ten positions?

I’m trying to make tracts to make a bug report that it does not fit the 0.5-0.85 probability of kill given in manuals. I need atleast ten R-27 shots for this

Read far enough back in this thread. You are not getting launch warning. Treat every lock as possible launch

It’s only from 30-45 degrees off nose it locks only r-73. Get lock and slowly move nose away and you will likely see it eventually. That being said it seems slightly bugged this patch

If modeled correctly it shouldn’t be unless in air to ground for 2-10 seconds after pre designating

The SPO-15 doesn’t necessarily filter, it will shown “un-known” radars just without category, but they will have lowest priority compared to radars which are known.

Nine line said they are changing this I also have bong in-accuracy and this is off topic, but you know you can correct for moving targeted with pre-designation

Try it yourself! Max range is Mach 0.5-0.6 below 5 km and Mach 0.8 at 12 km. At 12 km Mach 0.8 you will be closer to 7 degrees. However max endurance is 400 kmh IAS. I believe those GAF numbers are for lower altitude (0-5 km) and are simply not saying so. Per practical aerodynamics “the most advantageous angle of attack is 4...7 depending on the altitude”

Yes I agree. They were still working on vertical scan as of last patch. I expect more changes

What’s wrong with DTC? But yes, I can’t see anything in LUA either Not exactly helpful but I think the default/lowest value program is best all around program anyways

Your first paragraph mentioned ED understanding the document wrong and then you talk about ED’s response to Bullet’s video about the abandoned plans for external rangefinder mechanism for MiG-29. I just wanted to say I think they understood the document correctly. This “external rangefinder” is probably just Pazur anyways.

SPO will still show radars it does not recognize just not categorize them and thus give them very low priority. Then there are many radars it might confuse as enemy

It depends. At 25 km, your radar is scanning 2,500m +/- the deltaH you have set. At 50 km this is 5,000m +/- the delta H you have set. So it may still be in radar view, or you can use TWS so that the target is automatically locked I mean I actually like it. Only limit is -6 deltaH as max down elevation. But as I mentioned actual scan can extend far fro deltaH setting. I’m not so sure. For example I have yet to find a MiG-29 manual saying to set range with wheel. And a few including the L-18 manual say to “set range with Ku-31 target acquisition slew button.” Or they just mention setting deltaH and putting TDC where you expect target.

The pilot literally has finger on trigger, they just need to flip it up to get full functionality. I don’t see how MiG could see this as a problem. Radar vertical scan max time from scanning and lock: 4.2 seconds IRST vertical scan max time for scanning and lock: 1.9 seconds

The range bar also tells you you are in pursuit

Manual mentions 4-7 degrees as optimal AOA. If I follow the maximum range speeds I end up with 4 degrees AOA down low and 6-7 up high

The difference is radar vertical scan takes 2.2 seconds to lock and just as long to scan the whole scan zone. IRST vertical scan scans the whole zone in 0.4 seconds ands locks in 1.5 seconds

Take screenshots. I make all my videos with the intention that people can take screenshots to save all the info

If ED gets new info and changes the modeling in 6 months-5 years I expect an extra gift!

The chart is in my video above There really aren’t many for Fulcrum “fuel flow per speed and altitude” charts, though there are more for “fuel used for climb/descent with xx payload”

For those that can’t remember everything Wags says like me