Tom Kazansky

I see. With this thread running for 4 years now, I wondered how difficult it could be to implement a hotkey that just leaves the platform as it is and toggles it on again. But maybe I have no clue how the lack of movement breaks immersion. I hope I get to check out such a gear some day.

Sehe ich genauso. Tja, egal was sich Razbam - also Ron sich dabei gedacht hat als er das öffentlich klären wollte, kann jetzt wohl keiner mehr der Meinung sein, dass das ne gute Idee war.

Viele davon kommen über Steam an DCS und da sehen die aktuellen Bewertungen nicht danach aus, dass alles so weiter gehen würde wie vor dem Streit.

Maybe a naive question, but is there no hotkey that pauses/disengages the motion of the platform? Just a work around for the occasions that trigger those oscillations, but it would stop the game and the gear from breaking. Couldn't this be implemented in both DCS and/or the platform's software?

Will the Air Boss deck be optimised for VR in terms of usability, too? Nice new launcher btw.

Seh ich auch so. edit: Allerdings glaub ich es nicht. Aber wenn die dann so was nicht (schnell) fixen ist das dann schon absichtlich.

Thanks! Is this something ED can probably repair, for it seems it has to do with file dates, or do you need Razbam for a fix?

Doesn't look too good for June:

Moin, wo fang ich an? Also die M2000C ist nicht mehr im Early Access, und ne Open Beta von DCS gibt's offiziell auch nicht mehr. Und ja, das Modul hat mehrere ernste Bugs (u.a. max G)*. Aber das eigentliche Problem liegt darin, dass Razbam aktuell und offiziell die Weiterentwicklung und auch die Fehlerbehebung aller ihrer DCS Flugzeuge ausgesetzt hat, bis die "Meinungsverschiedenheiten" mit Eagle Dynamics geklärt sind, oder eben für immer. https://www.razbamsimulationsllc.com/ Die M2000C ist/war eigentlich ein Top-Modul in DCS und falls Razbam weiter macht lohnt sie sich ganz sicher. ABER: Wenn du bis heute ohne sie ausgekommen bist, dann würd ich lieber warten, oder das Free Trial Programm von DCS nutzen und sie zwei Wochen fliegen. *edit: In diesem Thread wird behauptet, dass jemand ("G") der nicht mehr für Razbam arbeitet, sich um den G-Bug gekümmert hat, ohne dass es in den letzten Patchnotes erwähnt wurde. Es wird auch vermutet, dass es noch weiter Fixes geben könnte.

HB has confirmed that they will do a Naval Phantom as a separate module. It would surprise me, if they did a fictional carrier F-4E (before/ever).

Well, I can confirm that Spud does not know me. Maybe trainers are much more interesting for people that have "flown" everything else for thousands of hours in 35 years of simming than for people who start simming? It is the limitation of performance envelopes that attracts me. And the quality of the DCS C-101 is outstanding. (Have all trainers in DCS.)

Another one of those here. I have so much fun with the C-101 and your campaign. So even after comming from the F-4E and climbing into the cockpit of this lovely little bird, I can't say it is less enjoyable than any other top module in DCS. Thank you for keeping up a great job of maintaining the aircraft and the campaign.

+1 One thing I want to add is the blast of having toe brakes. Never thought those would make such a difference but wow, the do (after getting used to them).

I choose answer C, which is: Do whatever is necessary to keep up DCS World.

Not a single crash with the F-4E here, but I've only used it with Caucasus and NTTR, so far (i.e. since release day)

Forgetting about some details of a module after a while is not only a disadvantage. e.g. I came back to the A-10C more than three times, and I always had to learn some procedures, systems and methods again. But every time it was worth it and the Hog felt even better and better, so I'm looking forward to coming back to my favourite modules after having had enough fun with the newer ones.

can confirm: without disconnecting, the AAR gets the Phantom's tanks (incl. external bags) filled up to the max before the tanker calls "transfer complete" (7 minutes of sweat )

this happened to me indeed. I disconnected once, closed the AAR door, opened it again, reconnected to the boom and very shortly after that, the tanker called "transfer complete" at 10.7k pounds. Thanks for clarification and the effort you put into this to get it fixed.

Yeah, I got a "transfer complete " at 10.7k pounds internal.

had the same two days ago and can confirm what Flappie said:

lol, really funny. but what ever helps... thank you and @Mr_sukebe for your help!

same here. Maybe I misused the "Jester Context Action" key before I tried to get an A2G lock, but I saw it once (in the backseat), that Jester's video source was off, and not "Radar". I switched it to Radar manually, and everything worked fine.

now it's getting interesting.... coincidently, yesterday I had to exclude a F-4E file from my antivirus software to be able to run DCS. So I tested with AV off afterwards, and that reduced the spikes, but they were still there (with Foldable view unticked). Now I just tested your suggestion @Flappie and the spikes are all gone completely when I press that icon (which is selectable in Foldable view). I know that this icon displays all keybindings. So it should show exactly as many as unticking "Foldable view" does, but the difference is like day and night. How did you know Flappie? Are there any insights you can give us about the differences between those two methods of showing all keybindings?