Shimmergloom667

You won't be able to discern much difference between small arms calibers. Whenever we shot 5,56 and 7,62 they pretty much looked the same at night.

Like, the new carrier module (not a new Stennis module) is being talked about every week at this point: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=237890 More news in todays newsletter.

It's been a few years since I shot tracers at night, but: tracers IRL are humungous. It's a glowing bullet going a few hundred meters / second that draws a loooong line on your retina. That screenie actually looks too short.

Legacy hornets cant buddy refuel, only Supers

Nope. IR pointer, as opposed to the Laser.

I would go to my PayPal RIGHT NOW and shell out 80 bucks if an E-Rhino was announced.

I'm pretty sure you don't have to have the bearings and distances between waypoints saved in your FMS to be RNAV capable, as you can see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_navigation#Functional_requirements

To the best of my knowledge: there is no such information available on the applicble, navigation-related DDI pages.

The app is free and you can download it in the 2nd thread. Still: the command is easy to use.

Take this: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=114030 Or this: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=160053

What would I need more than one account for?

It literally is one command and a few megs of delta download.

I really wish this would get marked with at least *investigating*, since this is pretty clearly layed out and worth investigating.

No dude, seriously: that still doesn't make the open beta the de-facto stable. It may be the version everyone plays on because no one has time to wait for features, but it is still the beta version with bugs to be expected.

We all know that the Walleye implemented the tech for the SLAM / SLAM-ER. Also it will be fixed soon enough. Take a chill pill, report the bugs, wait for the fixes. That's what an open beta is for.

Hi! While I'm part of a squadron, I only play MP on our weekly flyout, basically. I'm enjoying SP the rest of the time. Even in whirlybirds I'm having lots of fun. Could the AI use improvement? Sure, show me a game where it doesn't. :) And it will, as evidenced by the new gunnery adjustments and the upcoming new FM. Things will turn out well in the end, I have patience.

TMS left is wrong in any case, though. TMS up short for point or TMS up long / right short for area track. TMS left should toggle polarity.

Not yet finished

Autotrim of planes without FBW. They added it a few patches back.

Speak for yourself. *I* would gladly buy into another EA like the Viper again, since I a) don't care how complete the initial release is and b) like taking part in watching it mature.

Very carefully

I'm pretty sure you have proof why that should be the FM and not you, right? Right?

The ACM modes simply put him into STT, too, so then it works like the "regular" IFF interrogation in the Viper as in: look at IFF responses on the FCR page

But true. Either TMS left and glance at the STT on the MFD or visually identify him.

The external model in itself is not yet finished, so why fix lights now when you dont have the final model in the first place?