lee1hy

what support the team? did you support what? They are working hard. Don't rush them. Pls Act like an adult.

LOL its not easy Why are you always asking for it? You just do it.

Nose art updated

WIP Dyanmic bort with shadow

https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3313139/ UPDATE 2024

https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3313324/ Osan type bort number not support

https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3336235/ NOW BIG FLAG

only your alpha map problem NOT ED Open the Hornet file to learn how it was created night

Dont delete your history i like this color

Cool i will add later

HAVE GLASS https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3336238/

But, this post is not so ridiculous and makes sense. Hornet is used by many people, but ED has updated FC3. Hornet PSD is very difficult to match colors with. not bad if it is bigger and improved like FC3

Thanks https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3336173/ 14th have glass redeuced panel of NORMAL MAP /

If there is a competition, I agree. Since I'm busy with real life working / project, there's no reason to spend my time on this game. and commutiy under treat me like this This is a free labor and only hobby, I don't gain anything from this project and I don't need any game mileage I didn't submit since Wags open this post, Because I expected something like this However, it is not polite refuse ED's decision. But now this point, It's not right to quit If ED changed their policy tomorrow I strongly agree I hope there will be a livery contest next time

yes its old i forgot, i will convert to roughmet

If update new 3d Whole liveries re work agian Hell.of nightmare........

rar pack will be converted to zip by ED team. They may delete other textures and normals for size capacity. official livery, the quality may be lower than user files. and 7zip is better compression

seriously we need more ww2 skins by @II.JG1_Vonrd

This is an early stage texture now This is a LOW-RES texture. However, I plan to RE-MASTER it in 4K detail soon. part of livery, IC pass OK https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3313768/ Air to Air weapons Completed -AIM_120С -AIM-9M -AIM-9X-main -AIM-7M -AIM-9L -AIM-9P5 -AIM-9P -AIM_120B -AIM-7F Planned -R-77 (FC3) -R-73 (FC3) Air to Ground bombs & missile https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3336172/ Completed -GBU-12 -GBU-24 -GBU-31 -GBU-38 -GBU-54 -MK-82 -AGM-88C Planned -MK-82 AIR -MK-84 -AGM-84 -AGM-130 -MAVs Etc -MXU-648 planned missiles are currently counting all Rivets LOT labels for the bombs are WIPs It may be modified or changed depending on the reference Rivet counting How to install Chose the livery you want, open description.lua with notepad and copy n paste the following text livery = { {"AGM_88", DIFFUSE , "agm_88_diff", false}; {"AGM_88", ROUGHNESS_METALLIC , "agm_88_diff_roughmet", false}; {"GBU_12", DIFFUSE , "gbu_12_diff", false}; {"GBU_12", ROUGHNESS_METALLIC , "gbu_12_diff_roughmet", false}; {"GBU_38", DIFFUSE , "gbu_38_diff", false}; {"GBU_38", ROUGHNESS_METALLIC , "gbu_38_diff_roughmet", false}; {"GBU_31", DIFFUSE , "gbu_31_diff", false}; {"GBU_31", ROUGHNESS_METALLIC , "gbu_31_diff_roughmet", false}; {"GBU_54", DIFFUSE , "gbu_54_diff", false}; {"GBU_54", ROUGHNESS_METALLIC , "gbu_54_diff_roughmet", false}; {"GBU_24", DIFFUSE , "gbu_24_diff", false}; {"GBU_24", ROUGHNESS_METALLIC , "gbu_24_diff_roughmet", false}; {"MK_82", DIFFUSE , "mk_82_diff", false}; {"MK_82", ROUGHNESS_METALLIC , "mk_82_diff_roughmet", false}; }

So what color is right? Do I really need to post pictures of the US f-16 in various colors here? even one color there are different depends on sunlight or wron or painted group When Cydrych mentioned about HAVE GLASS, then what you said? You forced that everyone knows and can be searched on Google you keep said "This is right and that is wrong." Ordinary people have wrong about HGV" to him and same to me What kind of nonsense is this ? Oh yes, default f-16 is so bad, we know, I did not choose this project myself, I am working on it because it was suggested by ED, but I am still try fixing my work. If you're have more material, send it to ED. But I don't think you have more material than ED

Texac is recently uploaded (77th and 55th HV), it has the same logo and same stencil , same black label, as mine, same tail flash, yes he is great f-16 skins Have I uploaded mixing fiction units and patches? Oh yes, maybe diffrents HUE/SAT and roughmet by "his style" Still dont understand it what is his point of accuracy And why keep summoning someone in here? what are the real intentions? really accept postive feedback? i dont think so ( summoning someone and looks like same before?) even he is refuse feedback yourself, how can you feedback others? forcibly erased who wrote feedback

Looking at the date of your writing speed , I don't think you missed Wag's submit post, but But now you haven't submitted anything that you are say "i dont like, its not accuracy" and blah blah thing now? Only you enjoy and viper love? everybody enjoy and viper love Even when I recommended others, you did nothing. I always made changes after receiving feedback from people working on real airplanes in the users files comments Opinions like yours are not considered feedback It's just a criticism that your posts are always locked.

Who judges whose accuracy? Has anyone worked in the USAF, in the Maintenance Group, or actually painted an F-16? DCS Livery has a lot of really great skins makers, including 3D industrial level and more. a lot of great skin makers, not just for the f-16 There are some weird small group of people who think they are the best and said "im best" "my freind is best" . To the public, they may all appear to be the same skin. It's so funny to come this far and say something about metallic and blabla thing In the end, , “My skin is the answer, select my skin, my friend skin is best ” no? Isn't this it? no one represents f16 livery Don't be conceited Do you think with common sense that such diffuclt and complex colors can be done simply? Please don't criticize others again and locked this thread either. https://twitter.com/potettan620/status/1612300431694364672/photo/2 https://www.alamy.com/us-air-force-f-16-in-the-new-have-glass-radar-absorbing-paint-image431668908.html https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9465763