Jump to content

Spurts

Members
  • Posts

    1272
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Spurts

  1. I see where you are coming from @SkateZilla. I can just agree to disagree as far as what to refer to them as.
  2. and the manuals which all call out CFT. FAST Pack was the original program but it was largely abandoned. There were versions with internal ECM, internal IR, extra motors, and internal weapons, and many other things.
  3. TM Warthog does just fine
  4. Curious what you mean by this, I prefer the mirrors in the Tomcat when it comes to visual quality.
  5. But it's offset to one side so the firing barrel can be closer to centerline, and also angled so the recoil passes through CG instead of under it.
  6. I have no idea about the manual. but AFAIK it is "feature complete" and updates are related to bug squashing.
  7. I did. It's not clear. I see that if I lose lock it goes to flood, and the "boresight" mode uses flood, but I am not seeing how to use boresight and I am confused why the image appears to be a VSL "medium" Oh I see, there is a button near the Master Arm that switches it.
  8. I'm still a little lost on how flood is initiated. Could you help me out there? Thanks in advance Naquaii
  9. F-14 bomber intercept from the back seat. https://youtu.be/9xDhiRH6uH4
  10. @Coole28 the fuselage stations are COVERED by the CFTs and are REPLICATED on the CFTs.
  11. No problem @IronMike. Take whatever time you guys need.
  12. The irony being that the F-35A is cheaper to purchase and operate than anything other than the F-16V, and then the difference in purchase price is 10%. If the US can't afford F-35s then it can't afford anything and should give up on power projection entirely (forcing a treaty break with NATO, S.Korea, and Japan) and consolidate to national defense only.
  13. The AF equivalent to what the Navy did would be "Hey, the Eagle is expensive so we are going to just use the Viper for every mission until we get enough F-22s to replace the Eagle role. We don't need air superiority F-15s when an F-16 with an AMRAAM killed a MiG-25. Get rid of the F-15Es too, they are too costly to operate and F-16s are perfectly adequate strike planes. You don't need the ability to carry a heavy load far when you have stand off munitions anyway."
  14. I recently did a 1v4 (2 Ace MiG-29 and 2 Ace Su-27) while in the F-14A and I think I hit 8G at the initial break... maybe. Most my time was spent under 250KIAS.
  15. Yes, it always could carry AAMs on the CFTs.
  16. Am I misreading the Horent indicator? It looks like it's doing 240, not 300+-
  17. I was going to say "First thought is over-G'ed INS" but @Golo beat me to it.
  18. Whats the speed on the F-14? same bank angle means same G, so turn rate is dependant on airspeed.
  19. Learning the Airspeed Indicator by peripheral vision is a huge bonus.
  20. the team with the most advanced (only VG) and intricate FM needs more FM people.... for cleanup work.... Yeah no. I am happy with the FM and any accuracy improvements will be welcome whenever they arrive.
  21. These always make my day!
  22. I've never encountered that one myself, but it sure is interesting. The Harrier does have a nasty stall.
×
×
  • Create New...