Oceandar

In my case, it was axis control mixed up with other axis controler( mine CH fighterstick + X52 throttle + TM rudder pedals). Check your on screen control with Rctrl + enter. Other than that I don't know, never had one..... (shrug)

That is huge area. I wish most of it would be populated.

Yup, I'd call it F-5 with steroid lol.

There's already a thread about this on this forum. Sadly we're gonna be stuck at Fox 2 missiles in restricted fox 3 missiles scenario. https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink?url=https%3A%2F%2Fforums%2Eeagle%2Eru%2Fshowthread%2Ephp%3Ft%3D232497&share_tid=232497&share_fid=74365&share_type=t

Lol, well its human nature I guess. Thanks for Mvsgas for the answers. Cheers

IIRC It was the ED director Nick Grey in QA thread says "too political" but I still hope it happens in the near future.

Wow this is exactly what I was thinking lately. It just you write it better. I don't mind at all about this as long as the price is like 5 to 15 bucks depending how complex it is for ED to develope.

Jesus Christ lol. The F-16 is so best selling fighter around the world that its really alot of variant can make confusing. How about block 40 that has lantirn and I kinda like fancy bigger HUD, which one is that? What F-16 that can carry AIM-7 for like BF scenario? And which F-16 can carry antiship missile? Thats sure interesting enough for future release at least for me.

Ok lets say its not easy fix but really...? Need months to almost a year to fix it ? Lol Never mind.... When I'm bored, I fly this little heli to troll someone in BF with my kinda like bolt of Zeus mistrall missile and gives zero kill score when somone kills me lol. I'm outta here....

I hope in the future there's more F-16 block to be released. like 40 or MLU with low price like 10-15 bucks as long as you already have current block 50 as primary DCS F-16. Its not really complicated to be developed I guess.

Well then, I need only the throttle which is hard to get and near impossible to find. I wish Thrustmaster remade and sell it again.

Just tried it on instant mission dogfight vs F-16 PG map. It was fine no wonky whatsoever at 800 kph.

From the past experience unfortunately I don't think you can. Sure I'm glad to be proved wrong.

Against AI yes sure quite likely, but against human would be wasted shot most of the time. I wouldnt bother shoot the missile beyond 10 miles.

I wish it could change somehow. I'd rather ED + Belsimtek or HB develope it instead of RB to be honest.

100 % Absolutely agree with this. I don't wanna be one of those bad boys shooting down friendly lol.

The Hornet should be first to finish I believe. We don't even hear new news about air to ground radar for the Hornet if we believe that Hornet is ED's testbed.

Roger that sir. Thank you for correction [emoji106]

AIFF is automatic IFF? Its down in the last of the list. I Initially hope it'd be in EA released considering how bad the hornet records on team killing in MP on the first week of released.

That happens if your speed is too fast around 1k kmh. Try lowering your speed around 600 - 800 kmh if my memory serves me well CMIW.

+1 on this one although its too political? Or perhaps situation changes now? I'd guess free map should not drain much of ED resources to make it and on the other hand it offers good gameplay for users. Crimea has been done in the past so probably ED just needs to convert it to make it compatible to current engine.

It does all right on me in TOO mode. But way off on target. It kills the closest emitter rather than intended target. Handed off on 11 but it gone for EWR instead which is the closest.

Not me. It doesnt matter. I'll pass this one. Not interested I'm sorry to say.

When they announced PG map is final actually I was a bit sad because there are areas that need to be populated. So I agree with you're all above. Unfortunately highly likely its just wishfull thinking.

Is this sarcasm or serious? If the latter, adversaries makes untruthful claims all the time when engaged in war. Welcome to the real world. No its not sarcasm, why do you think it is? I just knew that such claim exist that the Eagle actually does not have a clean record from A2A combat according IrAF from this article. Probably true and probably no.... (shrug) I misunderstand about R40 still tracking after radar lock was dropped, it says it was gone ballistic but still hit left engine of the F-15. Isnt it indicated its still tracking? Or was it just pure luck? Or all of this just IrAF claimed? (again.... Shrug) [emoji3]