Dr_Arrow

It was also messed up (in FC2) when different pressure at SL than default was set in weather tab.

Even RL Maverick (D/G) version has a hit rate at around 60% against ground moving targets.

that would be fantastic news.

Mi-24, Mi-24, Mi-24 !!!!!! :)) Fantastic news!!!

I also hope that it will be fixed.

Then, will A-10A have fully clickable pit with all systems working as A-10C?

Sorry, but the MSSWFFB2 is a stick of the past and is not produced anymore, G940 is the only current HOTAS FFB stick around - so I think that it should be given proper support.

How is it then possible that it has worked for all FFB sticks prior to 1.2.2 and now it is broken. Also G940 is a major FFB stick around and most of the sim people use either G940 or non FFB sticks as it is really the only FFB hotas on market. As a programmer I just can't imagine it is a difficult fix as it can be partially fixed through GUI and few lines of code swapping FFB axes for G940 correctly or just rolling FFB handling back to 1.2.1 version would do it.

I completely understand this and I support ED a lot, but I would happily trade all fixes done so far just for fixing the FFB bug as it prevents me to fly (use the software) completely.

I think you are mistaken here - Su-25 should normally take-off with flaps in position 2 (landing) (even with light loads). For example see this video: I've been also told about it from a technician that worked on Su-25's in our airforce.

As I opened the update log the only thing I was really interested in was fixing the FFB bug - but it is not there ;(

One more thing ... do not overload the aircraft. When on CAS, 16xVIKHR, 2xAAMS and 2xJAMMER + optional drop tanks are more than enough to do the job. People tend to load bombs, vikhrs, rockets, pods and then wonder why the aircraft handles like a pregnant pig. In every airforce standard combat loads are always much lighter than what the actual aircraft can carry. It would be even nice to have only 4xVIKHRs racks. Taking out more than 4-5 armoured vehicles during a mission would be a huge success in real life.

It is, if you have a radar.

I hope that people remember all the unjust criticism and bitching about current Su-27 model and skins in Beta version of FC3. ED could have communicated it better, however now it is clear that it wouldn't make sense to create new skins for the current model.

Thanks a lot for the answer, now at least we know that it has been acknowledged and it will be solved :thumbup:

Could you please give the bug number 44 some higher priority?? It is a major issue. It is preventing G940 players to fly any of the DCS World aircraft using force feedback. KA-50 is completely unflyable for us. I've been grounded since FC3 has come out and it is really disappointing.

Has it been resolved in the latest update??? It is not listed in the changelog :( . SimFFB is no solution as it only solves trim and all other effects including artificial feel system are gone.

As far as FC3 goes you cannot roll back to lower version. I sincerely hope that ED won't throw the responsibility on Logitech - G940. I've had G940 since its release and have flown different incarnations of FC1,2/DCS World and many other games/sims with it without any major problems and certainly without any FFB problems. Current DCS World version has messed up FFB axis assigments for G940 and I really cannot imagine how can be this a problem on logitech side as 1.2.1 version works well. I've always supported ED's products and it would be a major disappointment for me if this bug wasn't fixed, as it doesn't seem to be some complex coding problem.

Any aicraft can land at those speeds, however the question is about its usability after such "landing" :cry:

Such loadouts are out of question for real-world use. Under normal conditions you would use only a 16x9A4172 with optionally two droptanks, ECM. With other guided munitions a real combat load would comprise only 2xKH-29T/L, ECM, or 4xS-25L with ECM. You wouldn't carry IRL VIKHRs on SEAD missions.

... and it hasn't been addressed in the current today's update :(

In previous versions (1.2.1) G-940 worked FFB without any problems and I haven't updated anything on it, so I suppose that it is a problem on EDs end. Moreover I don't have such problem in any other sim I currently fly (Il-2, FSX, Falcon BMS, Strike Fighters).

I've never said that it is a pretty work-around. Su-25A and Su-25T for sure use trim buttons (electrically controlled trim) placed on the stick. You just can't use trim axis for those aircraft as it does not exist in real life. Autopilot utilizes trim to control the aircraft so if you select level autopilot mode and disengage it, you will get perfectly trimmed aircraft. It is normally not used for trimming it is just a side effect of a certain mode. Under normal conditions - you trim it manually and this is well simulated.

Yeah, I know it is a rather brute force work-around and it doesn't solve the problem of messed up FFB trim axis, but at least it seems to work with Su-25A/T until ED is able to solve the problem, otherwise I would be also totally grounded. I hope that it is a priority issue for them and it will be repaired in the closes auto-update as it prevents black shark pilots with FFB to fly it and there the trim is crucial.

I was able to solve it this way - In FFB tune I checked swap axis tickbox and I have remapped my left trim button to trim right command and the right trim button to trim left command. This way it works, try it.