Shaman

Okay guys, here it is (269p 150dpi scan, being now revised with 300dpi scan under same link): https://www.scribd.com/doc/242973567/MiG-21-navigator-s-handwritten-manual-of-cold-war It is just 0.99$ donation for my chips. How you later share among squad mates, I don't mind. Anyone who takes it and still requires same material in higher dpi scans divided in 4 chapters, PM me.

On latest update: Internal and external engine sound on idle, power, and ab in close F2 view are also very weak in volume feeling out of place - in comparison to diveplane's Su-27S engine sounds as best volume example.

This thread had over 20k views, if each view was translated to 5$, we'd probably had MiG-23 in development ;)

Breakshot X-man Teknetinium For keeping winning spirit of Su-27S against all odds throughout all these years since. A2A rankings (individual and squad) on: http://www.SA-SIM.com

Same as with Flanker and Hog and Frog those I fly most, for me game changing.

True, there's no going back after. It's best TIR implementation ever.

Kick starter or PayPal account please, make it shareware add-on with technical support and updates for 3rd party planes that is available to paid customers. I believe only basic Su-25T and twin seat Mustang that come with basic DCS World could be unlocked with shareware download. I mean guys, if you sacrifice family time make it so you have something out of it for them. I'll be happy to test it too.

You're welcome but I thought you need other sort of help since my Charlie HUD fits perfectly in frame while using proper neck mod, just had to move view point a notch forward and save new default position. (42 inch, 16:9 display) Oh so you're touching the code and modding HUD and not using original HUD from Charlie 10 with proper-neck mod for views, and I thought you only need a view fix by bringing head closer to HUD frame just like pilots do. It will be best if you create separate thread on HUD mods, as this is viewpoint behavior mod. You may receive more feedback from 3rd party HUD modders and developers.

Use in game feature, move camera forward and save new default position of your head

If that was in fact true, there would be no discounts, promotions and they'd be selling every DCS World patch as new game as CapCom does with Street Fighter series. Niche product, what DCS is, and they still out of this passion need to feed themselves and their families. As Chappie I also begun with Flanker 1.0, and road was bumby to DCS World but worth the wait.

I have been just looking for these (^o^)! Still there on Mediafire, thank YOU!

NOTE to JSGME users and general users of mods. Post patch I have noticed some of my mods don't work after enabling them again... then looked what is going on and... ED did some change? c:\Games\DCS World\Mods\aircrafts\ is now c:\Games\DCS World\Mods\aircraft\ doh! Had to fix folder names in few of my packages to see them work or I am going crazy.

Super sweet update. Uninstalled previous version, installed new version and HOLA! It just works. (and beside I had HELIOS and TARS installed)

It's gorgeous, I love my virtual MiG-21 :)

Client downgrade shall be enough, downgrade to .10

http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2012687&postcount=21 I nominate GGTharos :)

Yep, use the viewpoint controls to move it also up/down, and then save it as your default while using the MOD :) I made my own for every aircraft. Can give you mine, but - every monitor and homepit seat is different (TrackIR profile).

I am using VAC all the time, I hope devs listen. Never used this mod though, I was always fine with default, but in game option to volume off own AI dialog or to speed voice up could be nice to see and try.

x2 :beer: true, btw guys, I like Neo too, it is looking sweet but my if I'd have to choose my fav Airbus now it surely is Airbus A380 truly magnificentoliner. Flew it to KL and back, had two rows of four seats for myself in the back - lied down in one row, wife in next raw ;) Finally met our squadron com! Good time :)

I was responsible to do continuous technical material management for 787s first European airline and by that also organized modification of 787a after the grounding. Noticed lots of bullshit in media affected plenty of aviation enthusiast judgement regarding this airframe. I guess some people are polarized towards this or that brand, but the thing is, both Airbus and Boeing are the only players capable to pull off such projects and competition is good thing. Boeing took huge risk to take not 1 step but few steps forward, turbulences were expected (but sold otherwise), and it was just top airline and manuf managers responsibility that jumped on this airplane delivery schedule promises way too soon to obvious consequence. If it was Airbus airplane that took few steps forward instead of one, history would probably be quite similar. I am working in this business for over 7 years, take it as you want, but for me 787 plane today is the best (don't care about brand).

More reasonable thing to do would be Su-30K, because it is commercial and exported to many countries, more sources more accessible to research I believe...

HYPE X2

I just tried auto-start sequence (winkey+home?), sequenced checklist was performed but engine didn't start. If this is the case, lots of newbs are in trouble. And respawn. Manually it worked well at first try.

We have played as GCI/AWACS with ATC 3rd party tools and it was friendlier than CA experience ;]

CA feels more like a demo then finished product and as demo it's good. Beside coop between human JTAC with A-10C human pilot there's not much to do. There is basically no interface for human driver beside blindly smashing keyboard commands hoping for action. Same goes for Ground Commander screen, it is not too capable, plenty non-intuitive actions.