"Buddy Spike" - DCS World Online Events

[M0ltar]

Well now I'm confused too. Are you really Moltar from space ghost. You should consider changing your username. At least say something in your signature, like I did.

 

So glad your not being passive aggressive. /s All I did was say that people are confused, thats it. If you have to point out your disclaimer than the majority of people are probably not going to see it. Also, my username has no relevance to anything in DCS. Are you going to call our Zurich for being an insurance company and ask him for rates on your virtual jet? Again, its only in the context of this forum that your name can cause issues.

Edited October 20, 2016 by M0ltar

[Caffeine_High]

That's too bad. Back on topic please

[mia389]

 

Second, you really need to change your name as it always sounds like to new people that you are making official announcements when you're not a member of the BS team.

 

There is always some idiot in gaming fourms that does this with their names. They do it on purpose so others think their post means something more than the usual poster. This fourm has alot of experienced players and see it for what it is. His fourm tactics might work on new players like himself though.

[gregzagk]

Our new server is now up and running the normal "Blue Flag" version.

Server name: Buddyspike - http://www.blix.com

Online Map: http://gadget.buddyspike.net/

 

Our main purpose is to test stability and check if the "timeout" issues are gone.

Concept changes/ new features for round 10 will be added in the mission during the testing.

 

 

"Korea Flag" is currently down to fix some issues we spotted during our short test.

 

Let have some "unofficial" fun :)

 

Greg

Edited October 21, 2016 by gregzagk

[bolek]

FWIW, the disconnect issue was fixed for me already in the last few days of Round 9. I am going through Cogent and I have not changed anything myself.

[gregzagk]

FWIW, the disconnect issue was fixed for me already in the last few days of Round 9. I am going through Cogent and I have not changed anything myself.

 

Yes, we saw an improvement for many users while others didn't have problems since start.

A great number of players still had some connection issues though so we hope this will be fixed soon.

 

Greg

[RAZBAM_ELMO]

FYI the sever is up for Blix but the description reads Korean scenario but it is still stuck on 80s scenario

 

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

[mia389]

Was very impressed by server tonight. Cant wait to try it full.

[BSS_Sniper]

FINALLY. Some sabres gonna be rattled by fagots!

 

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

 

So glad your not being passive aggressive. /s All I did was say that people are confused, thats it. If you have to point out your disclaimer than the majority of people are probably not going to see it. Also, my username has no relevance to anything in DCS. Are you going to call our Zurich for being an insurance company and ask him for rates on your virtual jet? Again, its only in the context of this forum that your name can cause issues.

 

I agree here

[QuiGon]

"Korea Flag" is currently down to fix some issues we spotted during our short test.

 

Damn, just when I wanted to get in on the weekend :P

[M0ltar]

Was LotATC ever put into the server? I have an interest in it since I seem to be running gci now more than flying.

[Yuya6104]

Greg since round 10 is going be all modern should put AI for red SU-30 for red and the Blue Marines F/A-18C and the SAMs for red S-300's and Takguskia AAA Shrika and fixed ZU-23 SA-8 and SA-15 and for low value area like airfeilds and also should be ZU-23 fixed and SA-9 and SA-6 in the low value areas and Blue Patriot and Hawk and nato air defences on high and low like be in real world if nato and russia conflict if were to happen.

 

P.S. Greg need back CSAR & Fuel runs again make helicopters far far more useful have a bigger role to play like did dont down pilots pop smoke instead let them pop singal flares that way wount hurt anything. :)

[Blitz05]

Great round but now that it is over, is there any chance of putting the KA-50 and Gazelle on both sides to allow Blue and Red to use Attack and Recon Choppers?

[Yuya6104]

Will we be geeting fuel runs back and CSAR so helicopters have a bigger role to play. that can tip the scale of conflict of war?

[iLOVEwindmills]

Several crashes on the test server, issues?

[Dave317]

Are the farps, cities and comm arrays going to be in different locations in round 10?

[OperatorJack]

When's Korea Flag going back up for testing or whatever?

I was away and missed a chance to take my Sabre out to smash some MiGs :^(

[gregzagk]

When's Korea Flag going back up for testing or whatever?

I was away and missed a chance to take my Sabre out to smash some MiGs :^(

 

We are currently testing the new server to increase stability and then will decide on the dates of each event ;)

 

Stay tuned.

 

Greg

[D4n]

In buddyspike Forum it is still called Round 8... :P Pls update, Greg or sb. thx :)

[Alpenwolf]

Frequently posted threads: (Only to emphasize the importance of those subjects - in my humble opinion)

 

1) Can't wait to see the Korean war scenario!!! I just hope you guys don't include WWll planes in it.

 

2) Read a thread about you guys considering a Vietnam war scenario? What a blast that'd be! Especially when including the Vietnam terrain mod made by Starway (unless you have your own for that)

 

3) And of course my favourite: Pleeeeeeeeeease bring back refueling and CSAR missions! In my opinion this is a brilliant way of - oh not again this subject - balancing the teams in a different way rather than having the same number of players on each side. Taking additional missions for the helicopters into consideartion might slow down even an overwhelming force in matters of advancing on the enemy and capturing bases. Besides, we're not all - and now I'm getting into it a bit! - some children who simply want to fly the fighters and blast some shit in the air and bang about it! You know, FC3 simplicity. (Allright, that's it on the latter before I rage :) I mean, I love the Flanker and the Fulcrum, but I love realism more.)

 

We complain and rage over bugs, server crashes and this and that (me more than others for sure), but you guys have done this simulator quite a huge favour with these massive campaigns!

 

Fly safe and God bless!

[QuiGon]

Frequently posted threads: (Only to emphasize the importance of those subjects - in my humble opinion)

 

1) Can't wait to see the Korean war scenario!!! I just hope you guys don't include WWll planes in it.

 

2) Read a thread about you guys considering a Vietnam war scenario? What a blast that'd be! Especially when including the Vietnam terrain mod made by Starway (unless you have your own for that)

 

3) And of course my favourite: Pleeeeeeeeeease bring back refueling and CSAR missions! In my opinion this is a brilliant way of - oh not again this subject - balancing the teams in a different way rather than having the same number of players on each side. Taking additional missions for the helicopters into consideartion might slow down even an overwhelming force in matters of advancing on the enemy and capturing bases. Besides, we're not all - and now I'm getting into it a bit! - some children who simply want to fly the fighters and blast some shit in the air and bang about it! You know, FC3 simplicity. (Allright, that's it on the latter before I rage :) I mean, I love the Flanker and the Fulcrum, but I love realism more.)

 

We complain and rage over bugs, server crashes and this and that (me more than others for sure), but you guys have done this simulator quite a huge favour with these massive campaigns!

 

Fly safe and God bless!

 

You just spoke out of my mind :D

 

This is exactly the same list I have in my mind.

Especially 1 and 2, but 3 would also be appreciated.

And yeah, pls don't include WW2 fighters in the Korean Blue Flag that haven't fought there (BF-109, Fw-190). F-51 is fine on US side.

Edited November 9, 2016 by QuiGon

[BSS_Sniper]

You just spoke out of my mind :D

 

This is exactly the same list I have in my mind.

Especially 1 and 2, but 3 would also be appreciated.

And yeah, pls don't include WW2 fighters in the Korean Blue Flag that haven't fought there (BF-109, Fw-190). F-51 is fine ons US side.

 

+1

[Tello]

Maybe Buddyspike can set up a vote so something like every second round is chosen with democrazy :D

I think that Buddyspike wis only limited by the tools given and are working/stable from ED.

 

Bugged modules and or missiles are a big limiting factor for many awesome plans I guess.

 

Buddyspike and SimpleRadio have done more for this sim than some of the 3rd. party devs (super sry, it hurts yea)

[mia389]

Maybe Buddyspike can set up a vote so something like every second round is chosen with democrazy :D

I think that Buddyspike wis only limited by the tools given and are working/stable from ED.

 

Bugged modules and or missiles are a big limiting factor for many awesome plans I guess.

 

Buddyspike and SimpleRadio have done more for this sim than some of the 3rd. party devs (super sry, it hurts yea)

 

:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:

[Ciribob]

Working on getting CSAR back in :)

 

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk