Eber Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 Over 16,000 were built. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakovlev_Yak-9 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUICE-AWG Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 Over 16,000 were built. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakovlev_Yak-9 Or a Yak 3 for sure...good suggestion! 1 "There are only two types of aircraft, Fighters and Targets." Doyle "Wahoo" Nicholson [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLTeo Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 I'd take a Yak-9 over the Yak-3, since the -9 also flew in the Korean War. It would be a pretty good complement to the P51/Sabre/Mig15. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AG-51_Razor Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 I'd take a Yak-9 over the Yak-3, since the -9 also flew in the Korean War. It would be a pretty good complement to the P51/Sabre/Mig15. +1 THIS!!! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUICE-AWG Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 I'd take a Yak-9 over the Yak-3, since the -9 also flew in the Korean War. It would be a pretty good complement to the P51/Sabre/Mig15.:thumbup: "There are only two types of aircraft, Fighters and Targets." Doyle "Wahoo" Nicholson [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eber Posted February 4, 2020 Author Share Posted February 4, 2020 I would prefer the WWII Yak-9U as the opponent of the german 109 and 190. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost_awsss Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northstar98 Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 +1 as well as numerous other Soviet WWII assets. Modules I own: F-14A/B, F-4E, Mi-24P, AJS 37, AV-8B N/A, F-5E-3, MiG-21bis, F-16CM, F/A-18C, Supercarrier, Mi-8MTV2, UH-1H, Mirage 2000C, FC3, MiG-15bis, Ka-50, A-10C (+ A-10C II), P-47D, P-51D, C-101, Yak-52, WWII Assets, CA, NS430, Hawk. Terrains I own: South Atlantic, Syria, The Channel, SoH/PG, Marianas. System: GIGABYTE B650 AORUS ELITE AX, AMD Ryzen 5 7600, Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5200 32 GB, Western Digital Black SN850X 1 TB (DCS dedicated) & 2 TB NVMe SSDs, Corsair RM850X 850 W, NZXT H7 Flow, MSI G274CV. Peripherals: VKB Gunfighter Mk.II w. MCG Pro, MFG Crosswind V3 Graphite, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lmp Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 I'd buy it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upyr1 Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 I'd buy it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudel_chw Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 57 minutes ago, upyr1 said: I'd buy it +1 ... me too, but seems that we are a small minority, judging by the posts quantity on this thread For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600 - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia RTX2080 - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TotenDead Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 Let's pray for La-7 by OctopusG 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lmp Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 On 1/23/2021 at 4:00 PM, Rudel_chw said: +1 ... me too, but seems that we are a small minority, judging by the posts quantity on this thread Soviet WW2 aviation isn't terribly popular in the English speaking world and DCS has neither the map nor the assets to make Eastern front scenarios viable. I'd buy it because I'm interested in the aircraft itself, but realistically it makes little sense to make it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bies Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 (edited) Great classic plane. There is one problem with Yak-9 - to have any sense it would require at minimum WWII Soviet asset pack and WWII Eastern Front map. Plus preferably some Soviet AI planes like IL-2 and Tu-2. It would be huge amout of work. If it would be JUST one Yak-9 out of context, to fly fantasy scenarios only on western front map, together with US/British planes, covering US/British tanks, escorting US/British bombers - and making DCS even wider and shallower at the same time - in such case i wouldn't be interested. Edited January 25, 2021 by bies 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seaeagle Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 (edited) 23 hours ago, lmp said: Soviet WW2 aviation isn't terribly popular in the English speaking world Thats funny - I seem to remember another sim concerning the Il-2, which apparently did rather well. Quote and DCS has neither the map nor the assets to make Eastern front scenarios viable. I'd buy it because I'm interested in the aircraft itself, but realistically it makes little sense to make it. Less sense than it was to make the P-51 and throw it into modern jet sim.... in a Caucasus map? Edited January 25, 2021 by Seaeagle 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lmp Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 2 hours ago, Seaeagle said: Thats funny - I seem to remember another sim concerning the Il-2, which apparently did rather well. Hand on heart, do you believe Soviet WWII aviation is particularly popular with most of the English speaking crowd? I don't. 2 hours ago, Seaeagle said: Less sense than it was to make the P-51 and throw it into modern jet sim.... in a Caucasus map? No, possibly a little bit more considering the German assets we have in the game. But not because the Yak is such an obviously great and safe choice, but rather because doing the Mustang at the time was, how to put it, very brave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golani79 Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 +1 ... me too, but seems that we are a small minority, judging by the posts quantity on this thread Although I'd rather see some other modules of this era first I would get it as well.I just wish we would get a few modules for one consistent time frame / area of operation.Gesendet von meinem ONEPLUS A6013 mit Tapatalk >> DCS liveries by golani79 << Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TotenDead Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 58 минут назад, lmp сказал: Hand on heart, do you believe Soviet WWII aviation is particularly popular with most of the English speaking crowd? I don't. According to War Thunder - yes, pretty much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lmp Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 1 minute ago, TotenDead said: According to War Thunder - yes, pretty much Well, let's agree to disagree then. I'm pretty sure the Pacific theatre, Battle of Britain, Western front, Southern front... All capture the imagination of the average Westerner much more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzzles Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 31 minutes ago, lmp said: Well, let's agree to disagree then. I'm pretty sure the Pacific theatre, Battle of Britain, Western front, Southern front... All capture the imagination of the average Westerner much more. For Joe Public you'd be right. I'd say it's a different kettle of fish for simmers/flying enthusiasts though. Definitely would like to see a WWII Yak mono of some description in DCS. Fancy trying Star Citizen? Click here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rayrayblues Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 7 hours ago, TotenDead said: According to War Thunder - yes, pretty much ^THIS^ The Yak 9 is one of the most popular planes in the lower/mid ranks of WT. It comes equipped with either 20mm, 37mm or 45mm cannons. 7 hours ago, lmp said: Well, let's agree to disagree then. I'm pretty sure the Pacific theatre, Battle of Britain, Western front, Southern front... All capture the imagination of the average Westerner much more. I would guess that you haven't played WT. The whole Russian lineup is very popular with pilots and tankers all over the world. Granted, WT can hardly be called a sim, It's mostly arcade. They do have a sim mode, but it doesn't compare to DCS. Cockpit modeling and FM's leave a lot to be desired. That's why I'm over here now. SLAVA UKRAINI MoBo - ASUS 990FX R2 Sabertooth, CPU - AMD FX 9590 @4.7Gb. No OC RAM - GSkill RipJaws DDR3 32 Gb @2133 MHZ, GPU - EVGA GeForce GTX 1660Ti 6Gb DDR5 OC'd, Core 180MHz, Memory 800MHz Game drive - Samsung 980 M.2 EVO 1Tb SSD, OS Drive - 860 EVO 500Gb SATA SSD, Win10 Pro 22H2 Controls - Thrustmaster T-Flight HOTAS X, Monitor - LG 32" 1920 X 1080, PSU - Prestige ATX-PR800W PSU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lmp Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 1 hour ago, rayrayblues said: The whole Russian lineup is very popular with pilots and tankers all over the world. How much of that is the meta of the game and how much is genuine historical interest? 8 hours ago, Buzzles said: For Joe Public you'd be right. I'd say it's a different kettle of fish for simmers/flying enthusiasts though. Do you think an Eastern Front aircraft would be more popular with English speakers than an aircraft from any of the theatres I mentioned above? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rayrayblues Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 (edited) On 1/26/2021 at 3:18 AM, lmp said: How much of that is the meta of the game and how much is genuine historical interest? For me at least it was both. I have Ukrainian roots so I have an interest in the history of Soviet aircraft and I learned a lot just from playing WT. I'm not advocating for adding the Yak at this time. I would rather see the Pacific theatre develop with the new Marianna's map. Allied and Japanese assets air, naval and ground. To properly use the Yak we would need an Eastern Europe or western Russia map with battles centered around Stalingrad or something. I'd rather be flying Hellcats and Corsairs against Zeke's and Oscars. Edit: and landing on the Yorktown or Enterprise Edited February 2, 2021 by rayrayblues Additional thoughts. 2 SLAVA UKRAINI MoBo - ASUS 990FX R2 Sabertooth, CPU - AMD FX 9590 @4.7Gb. No OC RAM - GSkill RipJaws DDR3 32 Gb @2133 MHZ, GPU - EVGA GeForce GTX 1660Ti 6Gb DDR5 OC'd, Core 180MHz, Memory 800MHz Game drive - Samsung 980 M.2 EVO 1Tb SSD, OS Drive - 860 EVO 500Gb SATA SSD, Win10 Pro 22H2 Controls - Thrustmaster T-Flight HOTAS X, Monitor - LG 32" 1920 X 1080, PSU - Prestige ATX-PR800W PSU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upyr1 Posted February 13, 2021 Share Posted February 13, 2021 On 1/26/2021 at 4:18 AM, lmp said: How much of that is the meta of the game and how much is genuine historical interest? Do you think an Eastern Front aircraft would be more popular with English speakers than an aircraft from any of the theatres I mentioned above? I'm a bit of a Russophile- I studied Russian and converted to Orthodox Christianity. Anyhow even if that weren't the case with me I also like the early cold war period and the YAK-9 and Red military assets from the period would be nice for the MiG-15 and F-86 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nipil Posted February 15, 2021 Share Posted February 15, 2021 TBH, I don't believe that DCS devs would like to stretch their limited resources even further to go and play on the field of another well-established Russian WW2 air combat simulator, called after a certain attacker plane. They would have big problems competing with this another simulator in a Great Patriotic War niche. And they already are heavily invested into NW Europe and the Pacific. P.s. But if they do make it, it would be magnificent. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts