reported Link 16 Datalink Primary Track

[oibafx]

If you hook a Link 16 track with the HSD cursor, the track should be right on top of the actual position. Why is it lagging/offsetting in DCS? Please fix this issue since it is not functioning as in real life. Also is the display of the range to the track going to be added in future?

The current implemention of the L16 Datalink Track is very much appreciated, however, much more difficult to use than irl.

[oibafx]

In the picture above, the track should be right above the airplane and it should show the distance from your aircraft to the track as well.

[RuskyV]

Did you do a cold start, or hot start?

if a cold start did you do the HMD alignment?

[oibafx]

6 hours ago, RuskyV said:

Did you do a cold start, or hot start?

if a cold start did you do the HMD alignment?

It doesn’t change if hot start or cold start with correct HMD alignment. Same effect no matter what. Everyone I talked to experienced it in DCS. I created this forum post because 2 real F16 pilots got upset about the inaccuracy of the feature.

In addition to that, the track is also often lagging and stuck for a few seconds, which would have nothing to do with the alignment. Distance to the track is also missing.

[_SteelFalcon_]

Most notably is the lagging when the PDLT contact changes altitude. If you PDLT for example the flight lead, he climbs from 10k ft to 20k ft, the track doesnt smoothly move with him, but rather in „increments“, every 3-5 seconds or so.

Accuracy of the symbology gets worse, the closer you are to that contact.

[oibafx]

This. I always thought it’s just the way it is and realistic. However, as soon as I heard that irl it’s much better (almost perfectly aligned at all time), I thought it’s a problem.

[Harker]

The issue is that, in DCS, the update rate of all Link 16 functions is fixed at 1 update per 12 seconds. IRL, different elements update at different frequencies, with PPLI updating very frequently for example (~1-3 seconds IIRC, perhaps faster) and other things, such as AWACS contribution to non-PPLI aircraft, updating at a slower rate.

So, if you had the PDLT set on your wingman, it should update constantly and thus stay on top of the aircraft. If you have it on a bogey, it will likely update more slowly, like in DCS.

So the problem is not with PDLT, but with the L16 update rate in DCS.

The vertical thing is something else, because it seems like extrapolation is implemented in XY, but not in Z. No idea how the real thing works there.

[skywalker22]

2 hours ago, oibafx said:

This. I always thought it’s just the way it is and realistic. However, as soon as I heard that irl it’s much better (almost perfectly aligned at all time), I thought it’s a problem.

I guess you would have to provide some reliable source of information. 

[oibafx]

2 hours ago, skywalker22 said:

I guess you would have to provide some reliable source of information. 

I don't think so since the current implementation is illogical.

[llOPPOTATOll]

+1 for the PDLT showing range and aspect

[skywalker22]

1 hour ago, oibafx said:

I don't think so since the current implementation is illogical.

I know, but I know how it goes

[Koozie]

6 hours ago, Harker said:

The issue is that, in DCS, the update rate of all Link 16 functions is fixed at 1 update per 12 seconds. IRL, different elements update at different frequencies, with PPLI updating very frequently for example (~1-3 seconds IIRC, perhaps faster) and other things, such as AWACS contribution to non-PPLI aircraft, updating at a slower rate.

So, if you had the PDLT set on your wingman, it should update constantly and thus stay on top of the aircraft. If you have it on a bogey, it will likely update more slowly, like in DCS.

So the problem is not with PDLT, but with the L16 update rate in DCS.

The vertical thing is something else, because it seems like extrapolation is implemented in XY, but not in Z. No idea how the real thing works there.

You have open source docs on this? 

[Harker]

You have open source docs on this? 

In the IRL Link 16 stuff I mentioned? I have no docs I can share, this is me merely passing on info I've read or heard (from people working IRL in the field), so take it with a grain of salt. The same topic has been brought up and discussed in the Hornet forums, where the same issue is encountered with the HMD MIDS symbols.

[Furiz]

12 hours ago, oibafx said:

I don't think so since the current implementation is illogical.

To prove a claim you need to have some evidence or reliable source, it also needs to be public info. Being illogical doesn't mean it is not true to real world.

But I do agree with you, I think it might need tweaks, but I can't prove it since I don't have any documentation on it. Maybe the update rate should be more frequent so it doesn't lag behind so much.

[oibafx]

3 hours ago, Furiz said:

To prove a claim you need to have some evidence or reliable source, it also needs to be public info. Being illogical doesn't mean it is not true to real world.

But I do agree with you, I think it might need tweaks, but I can't prove it since I don't have any documentation on it. Maybe the update rate should be more frequent so it doesn't lag behind so much.

What I don’t understand is why ED made it this way in the first place. 

[BIGNEWY]

If you have unclassified evidence to support your claims please feel free to PM me. 

thanks

[Hobel]

vor einer Stunde schrieb BIGNEWY:

If you have unclassified evidence to support your claims please feel free to PM me. 

thanks

is not necessary, because it is a bug.

What people are wishing for here is already present in DCS

The error only occurs with aircraft in the group.

Edit: the same applies to the F18

 

DCS F16 datalink bug.trk

 

 

 

vor einer Stunde schrieb skywalker22:

I know its a bif off this thread`s title, but for example, same goes for the Target Designation Box (STT Radar Lock). It stutters and in many cases it off the positon where it should be. Maybe there is a connection, and that there is some JHMCS issue, I mean that the problem is more "global", and not only connected to what OP is refering to.

 this is also a global DCS deficiency, look at how the TGPs are shaking in A/A mode.

Edited July 20, 2022 by Hobel

[BIGNEWY]

4 hours ago, Hobel said:

is not necessary, because it is a bug.

What people are wishing for here is already present in DCS

The error only occurs with aircraft in the group.

Edit: the same applies to the F18

Thanks for the track and video I have reported