Jump to content

Your Love - DCS F15E or F16C ?


Avio

Recommended Posts

Can't help but ask a little polling, which you love more -- DCS F15E or F16C ?

I have both (and some others), but I find the eagle is such a pull much more than the F16C. Maybe I like it better that it has that 2 voluptuous MPD (7" vs smallish 5" in F16). Maybe I just prefer A2G stuff more. Maybe it's the good handling quality, especially taking off and landing (that awesome aero braking to a stop, with perfect brakes modelling compared to others).

I like the A10C too. If only that one is fast like the eagle !

But I do like the sound modelling in the F16C, that ever changing wheezing engine sound in cockpit that lets you know how much power you're using. Can't the eagle drivers hear that same changing wheezing sound in the cockpit IRL ? Quite a bit of "white-noise" in the eagle right now.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have both but honestly, I find the F16's hotas workflow far more intuitive and fluid. The F15's hotas functions are like "let's put this here, oh wait how about over here for the pilot and over there for the WSO".   

  • Like 11

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Gigabyte RTX 3070 Gaming OC 8GB | 32GB Adata Spectrix D50 3600 Mhz (16x2) | Asus B550 TUF Plus Gaming | 2TB Aorus Gen4
TM Warthog HOTAS | TrackIR 5 | Windows 10 Home x64 | 
My HOTAS Profiles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have both, sure. Now I prefer Mudhen, you know, new but overall they have the same priority for me. However, if there was a WSO AI that talks to us (like Jester/Jester 2), I would consider the F-15E more interesting.

tumblr_mui8miDpPO1s5oxc0o1_500.gif

  • Like 3

Webmaster of http://www.yoyosims.pl

Yoyosimsbanner.gif

Win 10 64, i9-13900 KF, RTX  4090 24Gb OC, RAM 64Gb Corsair Vengeance LED OC@3600MHz,, 3xSSD+3xSSD M.2 NVMe, Predator XB271HU res.2560x1440 27'' G-sync, Sound Blaster Z + 5.1, TiR5, [MSFS, P3Dv5, DCS, RoF, Condor2, IL-2 CoD/BoX] VR fly only: Meta Quest Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Avio said:

Can't help but ask a little polling, which you love more -- DCS F15E or F16C ?

I've always had a soft spot for the F-15E, however it's still in early access and missing many Suite 4 features and weapons.

So for the moment, the more mature F-16C is my goto module for multi-player/coop despite it's more limited radar modelling.

It's also worth mentioning a guilty SP pleasure of mine ATM is the Gazelle's new flight model.

  • Like 4

i9 9900K @4.9GHz, 64GB DDR4, RTX4070 12GB, 1+2TB NVMe, 6+4TB HD, 4+1TB SSD, Winwing Orion 2 F-15EX Throttle + F-16EX Stick, TPR Pedals, TIR5, Win 10 Pro x64, 1920X1080

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GrEaSeLiTeNiN said:

I have both but honestly, I find the F16's hotas workflow far more intuitive and fluid. The F15's hotas functions are like "let's put this here, oh wait how about over here for the pilot and over there for the WSO".   

Yup agree the eagle's HOTAS workflow could have been better.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also have both and so far prefer Viper or hornet over Mudhen in MP. Why ? Despite powerful radar I found its radar contact too small for my eyes ( I wish it's as big as the C model). Probably realistic but I'm not a fan of pitch bobbing up in Mudhen. Last, same as other guys mudhen hotas mechanics kinda weird for me but it's probably just a matter of getting used to.

  • Like 1

Mastering others is strength. Mastering yourself is true power. - Lao Tze

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imo flying the F-15E is more laid back and rewarding than flying the F-16. i just dont like the f-16's FBW and the f-15e is just easier to fly. not saying the f-16 is bad but i'd never really decide to drop some bombs on stationary targets like i would with the f-15

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Oceandar said:

Probably realistic but I'm not a fan of pitch bobbing up in Mudhen. Last, same as other guys mudhen hotas mechanics kinda weird for me but it's probably just a matter of getting used to.

The pitch bobbing is because a normal joystick length just simply cannot replicate the longer stick length of the real eagle. Setting pitch curve of about 20 makes it a real joy to fly, with hardly any pitch bobbing. Try it.

 

11 hours ago, Zahnatom said:

Imo flying the F-15E is more laid back and rewarding than flying the F-16. i just dont like the f-16's FBW and the f-15e is just easier to fly. not saying the f-16 is bad but i'd never really decide to drop some bombs on stationary targets like i would with the f-15

Agree on the part about the F16’s FBW. Either I not quite getting used to it or something, I find the eagle trims and flies much more predictably and therefore, very precisely in all sorts of manoeuvres.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Ramsay said:

It's also worth mentioning a guilty SP pleasure of mine ATM is the Gazelle's new flight model.

I was excited to hear about the new FM but when I climbed in it it was a ride from hell. It seems even more f'ed than it did before. 😞 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, pii said:

I was excited to hear about the new FM but when I climbed in it it was a ride from hell. It seems even more f'ed than it did before.

I find the SA-342M pretty well-behaved when fully loaded (used to be under powered), while a lightly loaded L (empty after firing all it's HOT3) is very twitchy.

AFAIK the new FM is still being iterated on, so I'm not "concerned", it does make for some "interesting" flights though. YMMV.

  • Like 1

i9 9900K @4.9GHz, 64GB DDR4, RTX4070 12GB, 1+2TB NVMe, 6+4TB HD, 4+1TB SSD, Winwing Orion 2 F-15EX Throttle + F-16EX Stick, TPR Pedals, TIR5, Win 10 Pro x64, 1920X1080

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far enjoying the F-15 airframe better than the F16s which I find less natural to feel/fly in its responses (both engine and aerodynamic).  Also really annoying that F16 still has poor radar functionality (TWS...) + stupid TPOD shortcomings (like the impossible to read north indicating arrow which is needed for any talk on CAS stuff) ... also... I trust Razbam (and the excelent M2000) more for development and realism.  

i9 14900K / 64GB / RTX 4090 / Varjo Aero / Winwing Orion2 + F15EX / Virpil Wrbrd + Alpha Stick + ACE pedals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

F15E module is fantastic. Razbam have really shown what they are capable of with this. Love the F16 but the Eagle has more features and feels better atm. I love both but its F15E for me.

  • Like 4

harrier landing GIFRYZEN 7 3700X Running at 4.35 GHz

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080Ti

32gb DDR4 RAM @3200 MHz

Oculus CV1 NvME 970 EVO

TM Warthog Stick & Throttle plus 11" extension. VKB T-Rudder MKIV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My love if you consider real life aircraft is the F-15, and its brethren, the F-15E, of course. 

I've never ever liked the F-16. For the love of all that flies I'd rather spend my time with my beloved Jane's F-15 than Falcon 4.0 (that at the time, was in shop windows everywhere...those were good times). Anyway, in game, well the F-16 is more mature and the F-15 is in a very early state, so points to the F-16 on that. But the Mudhen will always be #1 in my heart. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Avio said:

While Razbam's F15E here isn't as complete yet, I find it much sweeter and a joy to fly in, despite its lack of FBW like in the F16. That makes me wonder, is FBW really what it cracks up to be?

 

Have a go at the M2000 and you'll see what FBW can do 😀

  • Like 1

i9 14900K / 64GB / RTX 4090 / Varjo Aero / Winwing Orion2 + F15EX / Virpil Wrbrd + Alpha Stick + ACE pedals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Avio said:

While Razbam's F15E here isn't as complete yet, I find it much sweeter and a joy to fly in, despite its lack of FBW like in the F16. That makes me wonder, is FBW really what it cracks up to be?

 

What’s the consensus on what its supposed to be?  Its original development was built to make unstable aircraft stable. What more is the expectation of it?

The -15 is inherently stable on its own in most cases, but also has CAS for some of the same reasons when it may not be as happy. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I miss the single canopy and the SEAD capability from the F-16...and for sure its more nimble....but the Mudhen has a lot more range....and yes,I prefer it.

Just now, badger7966 said:

I miss the single canopy and the SEAD capability from the F-16...and for sure its more nimble....but the Mudhen has a lot more range....and yes,I prefer it.

Terrain following radar and a proper AGM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don´t want to choose, monogamy is not a thing for me on DCS.

  • Like 3

i5 8400 | 32 Gb RAM | RTX 2080Ti | Virpil Mongoose T-50 base w/ Warthog & Hornet sticks | Warthog throttle | Cougar throttle USB | DIY Collective | Virpil desk mount | VKB T-Rudder Mk IV | Oculus Rift S | Buddy-Fox A-10 UFC | 3x TM MFDs | 2x bass shakers pedal plate| SIMple SIMpit chair | WinWing TakeOff panel | PointCTRL v2 | Andre JetSeat | Winwing Hornet UFC | Winwing Viper ICP

FC3 - Warthog - F-5E - Harrier - NTTR - Hornet - Tomcat - Huey - Viper - C-101 - PG - Hip - SuperCarrier - Syria - Warthog II - Hind - South Atlantic - Sinai - Strike Eagle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Ala12Rv-Tundra said:

I don´t want to choose, monogamy is not a thing for me on DCS.

 

Respect!

 

For me, the F-15E is my baby. A big fast heavy hitter with nice tech toys - my Space Shuttle of Death. :smoke: 

 

But it needs more weapons. No doubt about it. The GBU-28 is a must. This plane is screaming for beeg badabooms!

  • Like 5

Some of the planes, but all of the maps!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Beirut said:

 

Respect!

 

For me, the F-15E is my baby. A big fast heavy hitter with nice tech toys - my Space Shuttle of Death. :smoke: 

 

But it needs more weapons. No doubt about it. The GBU-28 is a must. This plane is screaming for beeg badabooms!

So a penetrator that will be useful for nothing DCS offers.  Just because it weighs more doesnt mean anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rainmaker said:

So a penetrator that will be useful for nothing DCS offers.  Just because it weighs more doesnt mean anything. 

 

I am joyfully impervious to your negative waves, baby. :smoke:

 

My big fat GBU-28s will not only make me smile, but actually make my bourbon even more delicious. 🥃

  • Like 9
  • Thanks 1

Some of the planes, but all of the maps!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...