The_Pharoah Posted January 23, 2013 Posted January 23, 2013 (edited) I don't know if its been requested before but I sincerely hope that DCS (or a 3rd party) consider making an F4 Phantom II or F105 Thunderchief ("Thud") which would be good adversaries (well the F4 anyway) for the upcoming Mig 21. So if you consider the following: - Mig 21 (in dev) - F4 Phantom II (hopeful) - F105 Thunderchief (hopeful) - Bell UH-1 (in dev) - A7 II Corsair (in dev) - Vietnam map (North and South and perhaps Thailand - hopeful) We've almost essentially got ourselves the ingredients for a Vietnam-type campaign!! Perhaps an A-1 Skyraider ("Spad") thrown in for both the USAF and USN..... Edited January 23, 2013 by The_Pharoah spelling AMD AM4 Ryzen7 3700X 3.6ghz/MSI AM4 ATX MAG X570 Tomahawk DDR4/32GB DDR4 G.Skill 3600mhz/1TB 970 Evo SSD/ASUS RTX2070 8gb Super
prok Posted January 23, 2013 Posted January 23, 2013 1. DCS: Frontline Fighters [mig29 & f16] 2. DCS: Navy Fighters [su33 & f/a18] 1 ★★★ ★★★
badger66 Posted January 26, 2013 Posted January 26, 2013 Fxxk , she's cute ..... yeah , a gunship would be cool . Fighters escorting it for attack , reds doing their utmost to blow the hell outta it !!!
dooom Posted January 26, 2013 Posted January 26, 2013 oh yeah... this would be such an awesome module in MP! ASUS Tuf Gaming Pro x570 / AMD Ryzen 7 5800X @ 3.8 / XFX Radeon 6900 XT / 64 GB DDR4 3200 "This was not in the Manual I did not read", cried the Noob" - BMBM, WWIIOL
leafer Posted January 26, 2013 Posted January 26, 2013 No, not really. :P ED have been taking my money since 1995. :P
Furia Posted January 29, 2013 Posted January 29, 2013 It would be awesome. And for the same price, give us an Herky C-130 Please please.:thumbup: [sIGPIC]http://menorca.infotelecom.es/~raulurbina/ESA/banner_furia.png[/sIGPIC]
The_Pharoah Posted January 29, 2013 Posted January 29, 2013 why stop there? I'd pay good money to see a B52. Kill a grid square? How bout we carpet bomb it back into the stone age. AMD AM4 Ryzen7 3700X 3.6ghz/MSI AM4 ATX MAG X570 Tomahawk DDR4/32GB DDR4 G.Skill 3600mhz/1TB 970 Evo SSD/ASUS RTX2070 8gb Super
slowhand Posted January 29, 2013 Posted January 29, 2013 :thumbup:LOL,Now that would be the Life of the Party !!!:megalol: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] SMOKE'M:smoke: IF YA GOT'M!:gun_rifle: H2o Cooler I7 9700k GA 390x MB Win 10 pro Evga RTX 2070 8Gig DD5 32 Gig Corsair Vengence, 2T SSD. TM.Warthog:joystick: :punk:, CV-1:matrix:,3x23" monitors, Tm MFD's, Saitek pro rudders wrapped up in 2 sheets of plywood:megalol:
hollywoodvillain Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 DCS:F-16??? So i've noticed so far, and plz correct me if im wrong, but is nobody working on an F-16? I mean, I understand the prejudice about it, like "been there, done that" but seriously? This is the plane that really could bridge the gap and bring alot of people to DCS, who had already dedicated the better part of their lives to learning the F-16 in various other sims (for starters, not to name names but three letters and it starts with a b and ends with s...). What it comes down to is virtually no learning curve. Those people could just jump right in, no questions asked, no training videos, and start rocking peoples faces off. Don't get me wrong, i love everything about what is planned for DCS so far, but learning new planes can be a daunting task, so it seems only natural to have a module that the flight sim community has been familiar with for many years now. Does this make sense to anyone or am i just smoking crack in the corner by myself?
Kuky Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 you can stop smoking that crack now :D On a serious note... no one knows what modules/aircraft is being worked on, some are working on in but are not announcing it (gives them more time to work because people are not bombarding them with questions ;)) I am sure one day someone will make F-16 as well PS: I am still puzzled what name you meant that starts with a B and ends with an S... how about you give us more clues? :renske: :lol: PC specs: Windows 11 Home | Asus TUF Gaming B850-Plus WiFi | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + LC 360 AIO | MSI RTX 5090 LC 360 AIO | 55" Samsung Odyssey Gen 2 | 64GB PC5-48000 DDR5 | 1TB M2 SSD for OS | 2TB M2 SSD for DCS | NZXT C1000 Gold ATX 3.1 1000W | TM Cougar Throttle, Floor Mounted MongoosT-50 Grip on TM Cougar board, MFG Crosswind, Track IR
71st_Mastiff Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 How are you on the forums if your smoking crack? I do believe there is someone working on it, and the problem with licensing. I think hes referring to BMS. "any failure you meet, is never a defeat; merely a set up for a greater come back", W Forbes. "Success is not final, failure is not fatal, it is the courage to continue that counts", "He who never changes his mind, never changes anything," Winston Churchill. MSI z690 MPG DDR4 || i9-14900k|| ddr4-64gb PC3200 |zotac RTX 5080|Game max 1300w|Win11| |turtle beach elite pro 5.1|| ViRpiL,T50cm2||MFG Crosswinds|| VT50CM-plus rotor Throttle || Z10 RGB EVGA Keyboard/ G502LogiMouse || PiMax Crystal VR || 32 Asus||
hollywoodvillain Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 Sry kuky if i posted in the wrong thread, but i was kinda hoping for a serious conversation about this, insted of transferring me to page 571 of a thread that nobody really has any soild input other than a "wish list" and endless rederick about things that dont pertain to my topic (and maybe im wrong, but 570 pages is ALOT to go through). Plz no offence, can u redirect me to another forum page that might be more appropriate? THX :thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:YOU GUYS ROCK!!!:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
GGTharos Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 That's about as serious as the conversation gets. No one's making an F-16, that we know of, period, end of story. :D [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
D4n Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 Yes, AC-130 (at least AI using it) would be great... :D DCS Wishlist: 2K11 Krug SA-4 Ganef SAM, VR-TrackIR icons next to player names in score-chart PvP: 100+ manual player-kills with Stingers on a well known dynamic campaign server - 100+ VTOL FARP landings & 125+ hours AV-8B, F-14 crew, royal dutch airforce F-16C - PvP campaigns since 2013 DCS server-admins: please adhere to a common sense gaming industry policy as most server admins throughout the industry do. (After all there's enough hostility on the internet already which really doesn't help anyone. Thanks.) Dell Visor VR headset, Ryzen 5 5600 (6C/12T), RTX 4060 - basic DCS-community rule-of-thumb: Don't believe bad things that a PvP pilot claims about another PvP pilot without having analyzed the existing evidence
WildBillKelsoe Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 Not only the F-16 is great. It has HARM!!! It can be ground pounder.. It is an air interceptor.. it has ground mapping radar... it is the best DCS module to come to mind. AWAITING ED NEW DAMAGE MODEL IMPLEMENTATION FOR WW2 BIRDS Fat T is above, thin T is below. Long T is faster, Short T is slower. Open triangle is AWACS, closed triangle is your own sensors. Double dash is friendly, Single dash is enemy. Circle is friendly. Strobe is jammer. Strobe to dash is under 35 km. HDD is 7 times range key. Radar to 160 km, IRST to 10 km. Stay low, but never slow.
Exorcet Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 it is the best DCS module to come to mind. Besides the F-15 of course. But on the F-16 module, I'm sure it will happen eventually. It might even be happening now. F-15, F-18, and Su-27 were well kept secrets. Awaiting: DCS F-15C Win 10 i5-9600KF 4.6 GHz 64 GB RAM RTX2080Ti 11GB -- Win 7 64 i5-6600K 3.6 GHz 32 GB RAM GTX970 4GB -- A-10C, F-5E, Su-27, F-15C, F-14B, F-16C missions in User Files
Suchacz Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 This looks to me more like Chinook door gunner. I doubt, that Spectre has such light weapons. Per aspera ad astra! Crucial reading about DCS: Black Shark - Black Shark and Coaxial Rotor Aerodynamics, Black Shark and the Trimmer, Black Shark – Autopilot: Part 1, Black Shark – Autopilot: Part 2
Gh0st007 Posted January 31, 2013 Posted January 31, 2013 F-18C for sure... Then F-18E. My system specification i9 13900000K/Game board - 64GB of random access memory / Galax 7090/ ViewSonic Elite XG320Q 32 Screen of monitor/ VPC Collective - VPC Sharka50 Grip / Trackir 5/ TPR/ Orion2 F/A-18 Throttle/VPC WarBRD Base/ Hornet grip/F-16 grip/ and most of all a ham sandwich.
Adi Posted January 31, 2013 Posted January 31, 2013 If the A10C was made off the back of a training version for the USAF, then the F35 could also fall under this category due to the number of countries that were* placing orders for it, and thus needing training simulators. Is it not more probable that the F35 is, or was, going to be the next module? Maybe Wag's signature is more of a disclaimer.
GGTharos Posted January 31, 2013 Posted January 31, 2013 Apples and oranges. The ANG software was a desktop cockpit trainer. The F-35 simulators are being made by the aircraft's manufacturers or their subcontractors. It's all about the full tactical sim ... which the ANG DTS never was. Is it not more probable that the F35 is, or was, going to be the next module? Maybe Wag's signature is more of a disclaimer. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
taps Posted January 31, 2013 Posted January 31, 2013 Not only the F-16 is great. It has HARM!!! It can be ground pounder.. It is an air interceptor.. it has ground mapping radar... it is the best DCS module to come to mind. And how does it differ in that respect from the F-18?
Eddie Posted January 31, 2013 Posted January 31, 2013 The Viper has some stuff the Hornet doesn't, but then the Hornet also has stuff the Viper doesn't.
sobek Posted January 31, 2013 Posted January 31, 2013 And how does it differ in that respect from the F-18? The Viper has the HTS pods, for example. Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two. Come let's eat grandpa! Use punctuation, save lives!
Adi Posted January 31, 2013 Posted January 31, 2013 Apples and oranges. The ANG software was a desktop cockpit trainer. The F-35 simulators are being made by the aircraft's manufacturers or their subcontractors. It's all about the full tactical sim ... which the ANG DTS never was. Ah, OK. I didn't realise that it was solely designed to be a cockpit trainer. I knew it wasn't made to replace the room-sized military simulators, but anyway, thank you for destroying my theory. :)
Recommended Posts