June 6th Update Discussion

[Mazzic]

Funny, this week Wags sniped the weekly discussion thread starters :megalol:

 

I very much appreciate the approach with the small bugfixes to establish

a stable major version before introducing new features. Keep the fixes rolling.

 

And PLEEEEASE give the FC3 campaigns some attention, Fortress Mozdok and

Bear Trap for example are broken as hell and nearly unplayable with the

current AI behavior.

 

Mazzic

[Ells228]

Reaper's looking great, thanks for the update Matt

[VTJS17_Fire]

Thanks for the update, Matt! :thumbup:

 

I like the weekly updates very much. The MQ-9 modell looks great, looking forward to a new update, too.

 

Keep up the good work ED Team. You're doing a good job! ;)

 

 

kind regards,

Fire

[Mainstay]

Thx for the update ! Have a nice weekend :)

[tintifaxl]

I'm waiting for the news about EDGE and Nevada. Hopefully Wags can tell us something about it soonish :)

[GodsPrototype]

I'm waiting for the news about EDGE and Nevada. Hopefully Wags can tell us something about it soonish :)

 

+1 That is exactly what I wanted to say. I want some EDGE and Nevada news. They said they would give some info about it "in a few weeks" and that was I think a month or more ago.

[sobek]

Maybe they weren't able to make as much progress as they thought they would. Software development is a very tricky business.

[Silver_Dragon]

Interesting if the old UAV control station has be update with the new RQ-8

[Brisse]

I'm sure Nevada/EDGE news will come sooner or later. No need to nag about it :)

[Mojeaux]

Isn't any one going to talk about fixing the Air to Air missiles in FC3???????? or was that discussed and going to be fixed in the 125

Edited June 7, 2013 by Mojeaux

[karambiatos]

Isn't any one going t o talk about fixing the Air to Ait missles in FC3????????

every patch seems to chanfe them a bit even if they say nothing, or maybe ive just gone crazy

[Napa]

Reaper looking good :thumbup:

 

Don't forget the C-17 Globemaster ;) It needs to be done sooner or later.

[Crazyowl]

Thanks for the update!

[REPUBLICANO]

Lot of people would like a new 3d model for the Su-33 and this new predator is more important then. Great!!

 

 

What about the russian Navy that is still with the FC 1.1 Graphics? Kuznetzov? Peter the Great cruiser? Moscow cruiser? All they look like cartoons!!

 

 

Also a lot of beautiful russians 3D models missiles, but what the hell we make with this new models if all the russians missiles are broken in this simulator!!

[MemphisBelle]

How does anyone have time to worry about what DCS should have next?

 

I've spent all my spare time lately trying to land my UH-1H fast without entering Vortex Ring State.

 

Am really looking fwd to Nevada terrain though.

 

the reason is simply been described with curiosity, all what they want are some news to feed it. But Wags has to be careful with what he is telling to us as he gets strict rules about what to say and what not...that's not easy at all, that's why I deeply appreciate these weekly updates. And not having that kind of news I personally wanted to have, simply shows me that ED is working hard to reach a status so that further information can be revealed.

 

so keep on the good work ED and thanks for the weekly updates Wags :thumbup:

[9.JG27 DavidRed]

Very Considerate of Matt,Knowing he'd be out of town to post a update a day early.Thank You.

I'd love to hear more about EDGE,The Dora and The F/A-18 in future updates,Thank you for keeping us informed.

Cheers

 

+1 couldnt say it any better.

still i want to give it a try:

 

thx Matt and ED for keeping us informed.i think those updates really cause a better mood within the community.and it helps to spread the word...

EDGE,D9 and F18 are also the most wanted news on my side...

but nevertheless, sooner or later well get that anyway, and to be surprised by other additional news i have never thought about is nice as well!

thank you

[jctrnacty]

Thx for update Wags.

[tintifaxl]

I've spent all my spare time lately trying to land my UH-1H fast without entering Vortex Ring State.

 

You're not the only one... :smilewink:

[pepin1234]

the reason is simply been described with curiosity, all what they want are some news to feed it. But Wags has to be careful with what he is telling to us as he gets strict rules about what to say and what not...that's not easy at all, that's why I deeply appreciate these weekly updates. And not having that kind of news I personally wanted to have, simply shows me that ED is working hard to reach a status so that further information can be revealed.

 

so keep on the good work ED and thanks for the weekly updates Wags :thumbup:

 

I think you have right. But is unaccepted that the russian Hardware is outdated in some 3D models. There are only one and old russian hardcore Sim ( KA-50 ) and 2/1 US Hardcores modules made by ED. Now they say us they have a new Drone and maybe, behind this News is a new module for a drone ( like they haven made with the F-18C model )

 

Non Su-25A DCS, non Mig-29 DCS, One Su-25T DCS Sound like " WTF we are dreaming " and the only DCS they have in plans for the RU Hardware is the Su-27 like a DCS decaffeinated with Missiles that have been obviously downgraded.:helpsmilie:

 

Suddenly you like a DCS boxed Version ( no Problem my friends ) P-51 and A-10C boxed Version.:D

 

Where are the Ka-50 DCS boxed Version??:cry:

 

Just take a look in this post:

 

 

http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1778608&postcount=787

Edited June 7, 2013 by pepin1234

[EtherealN]

Now they say us they have a new Drone and maybe, behind this News is a new module for a drone ( like they haven made with the F-18C model )

 

There's a LOT of things that have gotten new models. MiG-31 comes to mind. Does this mean they are automatically new modules? No. You're making assumptions here, and you know what they say about assumptions. ;) But following your own logic, shouldn't you be out and about enthusiastically anticipating the DCS: MiG-31? :)

 

Indeed, you mentioned that yourself in the post you linked to! New model! Russian!

 

Non Su-25A DCS, non Mig-29 DCS, One Su-25T DCS Sound like " WTF we are dreaming " and the only DCS they have in plans for the RU Hardware is the Su-27 like a DCS decaffeinated with Missiles that have been obviously downgraded.:helpsmilie:

 

I read that thread you participated in, and noticed that you focused on Russian missiles only. Yes, I agree russian missiles are a bit gimped. But want to know something interesting? ALL missiles are a bit gimped right now, IMO. Unfortunate, but work is ongoing. Simulating missiles correctly with an AFM isn't easy, in case you wondered.

 

Seriously, Matt gave you some pictures of a unit that is coming to DCS, and armed drone. He does not state whether it's NPC or a Module. It's something in the pipeline for DCS World. What is not to like about that? It wasn't EXACTLY what you wanted? Well, if that upsets you my suggestion would be that you cease reading the weekly updates. This way you can simulate there not being any weekly updates at all, and thus you'll be back to the good old days. :)

[pepin1234]

There's a LOT of things that have gotten new models. MiG-31 comes to mind. Does this mean they are automatically new modules? No. You're making assumptions here, and you know what they say about assumptions. ;) But following your own logic, shouldn't you be out and about enthusiastically anticipating the DCS: MiG-31? :)

 

Indeed, you mentioned that yourself in the post you linked to! New model! Russian!

 

 

 

I read that thread you participated in, and noticed that you focused on Russian missiles only. Yes, I agree russian missiles are a bit gimped. But want to know something interesting? ALL missiles are a bit gimped right now, IMO. Unfortunate, but work is ongoing. Simulating missiles correctly with an AFM isn't easy, in case you wondered.

 

Seriously, Matt gave you some pictures of a unit that is coming to DCS, and armed drone. He does not state whether it's NPC or a Module. It's something in the pipeline for DCS World. What is not to like about that? It wasn't EXACTLY what you wanted? Well, if that upsets you my suggestion would be that you cease reading the weekly updates. This way you can simulate there not being any weekly updates at all, and thus you'll be back to the good old days. :)

 

Yes one Mi-31 new model, at least is something. You answer me if I do assumptions about a new Mig-31 DCS. I expect nothing about such module, but anyway was a good strategy, made for us just a new model.

 

If the A-10A become someday DCS one, for sure the russian part will get the news of a wonderful new model for the vikhr missiles, and everybody happy.

[SkateZilla]

if you want all the Allied/US Missiles Re-Vamped, Im 99% sure there is a Modding group that would gladly re-vamp them all.

 

 

As for AI Planes, They can be re-vamped and inserted by 3rd party groups, but I dont know if it will effect Multi-Player.

[blkspade]

There's a LOT of things that have gotten new models. MiG-31 comes to mind. Does this mean they are automatically new modules? No. You're making assumptions here, and you know what they say about assumptions. ;) But following your own logic, shouldn't you be out and about enthusiastically anticipating the DCS: MiG-31? :)

 

Yeah a drone module makes 0 sense, and is borderline redundant. You'd be a guy at a desk with a joystick and throttle staring at a computer screen. Might as well be making a DCS:PC Pilot module...

[NineLine]

Using the same argument a Drone makes perfect sense ;)

 

Yeah a drone module makes 0 sense, and is borderline redundant. You'd be a guy at a desk with a joystick and throttle staring at a computer screen. Might as well be making a DCS:PC Pilot module...

[SkateZilla]

You'd be a guy at a desk with a joystick and throttle staring at a computer screen.

 

Umm.... Isnt that pretty much every flight simmer does?