All Activity

Will the reshade mod also work if you use VR and a mixed reality cockpit? Gesendet von meinem SM-S928B mit Tapatalk

And why not a T-54A.

У бота выпускается )

Looks really great, but I don´t have the Mig-29 (yet). I would love to see this kind of mission for the Heatblur F-4 Phantom - maybe in a post cold war united germany? F-4 was beside the Mig-29 in charge for air policing over germany.

Hi. I have been flying the Apache quite a bit, and I really appreciate the latest changes to George, especially him being able to put TADS on targets engaged with the FCR to allow me to do BDA. However ... I find George works so very sub-par for most of this. Tell him to scan an area with TADS, he does. But then he suddenly stops scanning. He suddenly puts the aircraft back to "safed" for no discernible reason. When I have a whole field of targets right in front of me, he does not see any of them. When he finally gets coaxed into tracking one of them, he says "out of range" while the target is, like, 50m in front (maybe he means "minimum range"?). When we crash, and under certain other circumstances, he keeps repeating "aircraft armed!" like a broken record, being incredibly annoying. Besides, this is similar behaviour to what wingmen exhibit when calling out spotted targets: Repeating the same call forever, every five seconds, like a record, potentially until the end of times (or fuel). All this greatly ruins immersion for me, and constantly nudging George to do stuff makes any mission tedious and, if George is not being useful after 40 minutes of low-level flying under the radar, plain out painful. Now, this is honestly so bad that I wonder if it's me. Am I doing something wrong, am I too impatient, do I have some kind of missconception about how to use George? Your experience and opinions would be welcome. Thanks.

btw the reshade tip is working great! Thank you for this!

That wont work with the F4 but you could just delete the UI from the folder. In the F4 the entire UI is "local" and fully moddable. It is in Mods/aircraft/F4/UI/JesterWheel But it wont fix the problem, your UI inputs are not replayed and hence the aircraft is in a wrong state. If you make a coldstart with the UI using mouse or headtracking and then replay that, your aircraft will in the replay fly with engines off and no electric power. Consequently no weapons will drop, nothing works. Same in the F14. you can hide the UI but if the UI actions arent clicked then the aircraft is in the wrong state.

So, ummm, did something happen? Could we at least get a statement from the team regarding the F1 development? Not a release date or anything, but at least a short blog on what is happening behind the scenes. Just some clearer communication between the devs and players.

In the past it has been a multiplayer-specific issue (and possibly dedicated server only, versus self-host MP). It could be related to how forces on the load/cable are interpolated across packets which would become more critical during the final stage of a descent.

Because of early access. More liveries coming. From the change log, lists as 'in progress': - Additional liveries of countries that were operating MiG-29A. - Livery template. (planned for October) On UserFiles you can find liveries already https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/filter/type-is-skin/unit-is-mig-29a_fulcrum/apply/

What can we expect from 2026 video?

Yeah, but that's not a bug. It's probably a relic from back in the days. My suggestion was just a workaround, failed to mention that. Better make a whish. I'll support it. I really hope the new ATC will eventually have relevant accents. It bothers me too, but silencing them all together won't work for me i find text much more distracting, so that's what I disable. [emoji6] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Playing devil's advocate - I've yet to see an airworthy warbird restored and rigged to factory, period-correct state. They're set up to for safe, relatively cost effective and comfortable modern ops, obviously. In scale and virtual modelling they're considered secondary sources for a reason, with period documentation always taking priority (if available). We can see on previous page that description of horn operation in period doc is unfortunately ambiguous and confusing at best. Is ED's interpretation incorrect then? Might be, but until someone comes up with a better period source that's all what we've got for now. Is it such a big deal, though? Depends. It's possible to fly around well below 7 lbs without horn by dropping RPM to econo cruise values, I do it all the time. Not bothered by incorrect ASI texture either, it's such a minute detail that I only found out about it in August when relevant bug report was posted, even though I've owned the module from the beginning. Granted, I fully understand that for some players these small issues can be proverbial straw that broke camel's back in the grand DCS warbird scheme of things, but as of now Mossie is otherwise fully mission-capable in single- and multiplayer, so there's no need to put in in virtual hangar, in my opinion at least.

I'm working on it, there is very limited support in the SSA alpha... I try to get everything running in the alpha by tomorrow... Computer crashed and I'm currently setting everything up again...

Gorgeous! [emoji1] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

I just think avionic sounds from the aircraft should be unlinked from "human" voices in the settings?

bump

I modified the files so that it is the co-pilot displays being exported. The Pilot displays function as normal, and you can still export. Set co-pilot screens to same as pilot, or have different info.

Hello everyone. The new Fulcrum doesn't have many liveries. For example, it doesn't have the Iranian, Syrian, North Korean, and other liveries.

Oh...Wow! I`m so impressed by the MiG ... Cheers TOM

Everything is fine now, and loading times have decreased. I believe the reduction in the preload radius and the elimination of the cache were decisive. I can't assess the impact of Park Control, since the game runs just as smoothly as before.

Its fine to disagree, Lets cheer up with a photo

VAICOM, a free plugin for VoiceAttack will let you disable "own voice", so I'm sure it can be done for ATC as well. Can even force Russian ATC were appropriate. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Am i correct that the currenthill IRIS-T does show on the RDR, but not on the HAD (F-16) and cannot be shot with a HARM as the harm table value is unknown?