All Activity

Not really odd. Saves customers freaking out when they look at the European or other sites and wonder why the base retail price in the US is sooo much higher.

I am not sure what i did wrong here? I took out the two SA6 and wingman took out the 3rd as called for. Flew home, followed comms with approach, tower and ground, landed as briefed, parked as briefed, mission accomplished thingy on the screen and got 60 points. There was no debriefing for me to know what i did wrong? Briefing screen just said what the briefing was from the start. I didnt use HAD, but used WPN in POS EOM mode on SA6. I can see others in 2024 had the same scoring issue with 60 points.

Dunno about the F-15 grip, but there is only a single 'paddle' on the base, an mine is as smooth as all the others

Yeah, linky no worky my man.

Is there a possibility of an official exchange for Siniper?

You've asked for a similar BIT time as the Lightning pod, not for already aligned on cold start.

Seems to have been adressed in the latest patch https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/news/changelog/release/2.9.18.12899/

При всём при том он останется первым. Не может же он теперь стать нулевым, упрощённым, или синим. Более того, есть же и второй (JF-17). А вот если первый красный FF от самих ED, то да, это МиГ-29. Но по счёту только третий.

MiG-29 radar is weird. as far as I can tell, 65 degree azimuth limits is only for search, it goes to 70 degrees as soon as you track. Sam for elevation, only -36 degrees in search, goes to -45 in track. I would only really use the downward limit for tracking a low target from high altitude or lofting R-27R/ER

I have tried but it has some very odd behavior. Helicopters will not start on the helipads in the helicopter only bases but they will land on them. Helicopters set for vertical takeoff and landings will taxi for takeoff around certain airbases depending on which spawn point they originated at. They always use the runway for landing. A huge percentage of the first aircraft respawns all fly to and land on the Tarawa despite every RAT setting I tried. Many larger aircraft will still spawn in smaller spawn points and hit objects at the airfield either on spawn or while taxiing, also despite the RAT setting that are supposed to prevent this. Small and grass field bases will be chosen for takeoff (They air start) or landing if you don't specify the departure and destination bases. Despite RAT settings to exclude them. They work fine in the air, but not so much when they have to touch the ground for any reason.

Crickets...

You could argue that the market is so small for high-end Flight Sim peripherals, that even Winwing's business case was already marginal in pre-tarrif conditions. I'm not going to hold my breath for any US made products within this niche market. And if there were to be any, I'd have to imagine it would be using nearly 100 percent imported components. And on that note, it wouldn't surprise me if it's more likely for winwing to look into hiring a few people to do final assembly of the peripherals in the US in order to get the "Made in US" sticker. I doubt it would change the pricing much, since I imagine the taxes on importing their components will still add up.

hello log no longer mentions ntdll.dll as a problem. good. 2025-07-31 14:06:50.392 ERROR DX11BACKEND (27408): DX device removed. Reason: 0x887A0006 and a little further down in log 2025-07-31 14:06:50.413 INFO EDCORE (26600): I:\DCS World\bin\GraphicsCore.dll indicates a graphic card hardware or driver issue. remove any overclocking. including cards that are from factory OC. do a clean install of graphics driver by using DDU, getting the latest driver, and install it. a new nvidia driver dropped today. https://www.guru3d.com/download/display-driver-uninstaller-download/

If this is due to the tarriffs, would they actually be listing it under taxes on the customer's bill? I would think if winwing is paying the tarrif tax upon importing the inventory, they would increase the sale price of the product to compensate....not seperate it out as a tax owed by the customer. I'm not saying the price would be any different, but I find it odd that they would itemize the tarrif under "taxes due by the customer"

(apologies, did not see a forum wish list) 1) I would like a way to ignore complete threads. There are some currently in the forum that have a lot of activity and the take a lot of the real state when using the "all activity" tab. 2) Currently, when we ignore an user, we still see that they posted something. Ideally, I will like to not see that, they are ignored for a reason. And, of course, if there is a current way of doing this, please, let me know!

Oh my God... what part don't you understand? I also have all the RAZBAM modules and I paid for them... and VEAO, and many others...

Periodically it does say 20nm. Should be just 10nm.... or so I thought! -Ryan

I'm not asking for legal disclosures or expecting anyone to break confidentiality. When I say there's "no clear process or direction," I'm specifically referring to the future of the modules.... what will happen if things don’t get resolved, what users can expect in terms of support, and whether there’s any contingency plan. That’s not about legal drama, that’s about product responsibility and communication with paying customers.

We have shared all we can right now; it might be enough for everyone, but currently, that is all we can do right now. No matter how many times people ask, this will not change until there is something we can share.

1. It is impossible to grab the throttle (as done in fa18c or p-51d) 2. Grabbing the Stick is messed up - seems to be thinking I am upside down and that the stick-neutral-point is somewhere above my head upside down. 3. Impossible to interact with cockpit by touching (as done in fa18c or p-51d), but rather only via controller "laser" 4. training instructions proceed without waiting, which soon becomes confusing and frustrating. Since it was completely unplayable in this state I asked for a eagle dynamics for a refund but I would like to know when these problems are addressed so I can maybe repurchase the module.

You want clarity in a legal process....... And you keep generalizing, many of us don't care about the "drama".

That’s not the point I’m making. This isn’t about taking sides. It’s about acknowledging that this situation affects real users in tangible ways, and that they have valid concerns. People are tired of being told to “We are still hoping...” or “wait for a reasonable resolution for our customers” when there's no clear process explained. That’s where the frustration comes from... not from tribalism or a need to pick a side, but from being kept in the dark about what’s next. I'm not demanding control, just clarity. That’s not unreasonable.

Если правильно помню, горяческальному МиГ-29 было уделено особое внимание, точнее его ФМ. Давно дело было. Конкретно - адский кабрируйющий момент на больших скоростях. Поведение на больших УА. А так же надобность довольно бодро добирать ручку перед приземлением на расчетных скоростях (уменьшение скоса потока на ЦПГО из-за его близости к поверхности ВПП). Так что полетать на нем стоит. И что-то подсказывает мне, что ожидаемый кликаб будет сильно на него похож по ощущениям "на ручке".

If you start hot or airborne the pod will be instantly ready, wouldn't it?

CapnCoke Your suggestion as to how to make the HUD black worked perfectly. However, using your method, I ended up making the HUD a nice bright yellow.