All Activity

Why is it insane?

Even as a static - has this been released somewhere?

No, it very much is this topic. Regardless of whether we are using a toggle or held....this Mig-29 does not allow you to lock a target with the gun safety OFF. That's insane.

You already can, trimming force. I keep mine at 100

It’s fixed now.

It’s now 10/2025 . This bug still exists.

I used to run it as administrator because many sources recommended it too. Later I was advised not to as it's no longer needed (and can now create issues), so I stopped - with no negative issues. It seems running DCS as admin was more of an old practice and as a common workaround to who knows what issues, and the current best practice is not to do so. (Really, it probably never should have been recommended in the first place.) Definitely give it a go. It may not fix it, but it would be good to do as a test, and also to start migrating that way anyway.

Da gibt es von Modul zu Modul große Unterschiede. Bei einigen Modulen überstrahlen die Positionslichter sehr stark und sind auch aus großer Distanz noch Sichtbar, bei anderen hingegen ist das komplette Gegenteil der Fall.

Посмотри внимательно, 18-й практически идеально за нотчил ракету. Китаец поймал 7-ку лицом ибо ни сделал ничкакого противоракетного маневра. Ты сам себе противоречишь! "Р-27Р ракета следует за самалётом до момента предпологаемого удара противника. Тэквью показывает, что Р-27Р ракета совсем не следует за самалётом."

I have a feeling that no missiles are reching the base, any chance you saved a track or at least some missiln results? Missiles getting close to the base will trigger the dialogue with the improvised runway and the conditions to end the mission. Taking down 9 bombers is a tad unrealistic with your loadout.

Actually he sure can (when dealing with real people) which should be simulated by having this type of command.

as per topic

We have made a report for the team. thank you

I think Dassault only provides the licenses and documentation, not being developers themselves. It's probably a win-win for them after the success of the M-2K. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

I think I may have found the culprit. I still need to test it, but I believe it could be a cheap USB cable that I used for the Throttle unit. Looks like it was disconnecting and causing issues with the hot plug. Again, this is just a guess, but I've bought a better quality one that arrives today and I'll test the mission again with it.

Well, Dassault has licensed third party studio AzurPoly to make the Rafale for MSFS which they are currently working on: https://azurpolygroup.com/ What that means for DCS is anyone's guess.

I wonder if Dassault could buy the M2000 from Razbam. With the work done on the M2000 to improve its accuracy, my guess is that they already know each other. Either way, great news on Dassault joining as a dev.

I’m a westerner and I can confirm that I regularly get confused.

Я это понял как вообще излучение с самолета носителя не требуется. Просто не хватает и хочется Р-77))

They are NATO designations. Used to be mockery names. But that changed for some reasons.

threads merged.

@Tom P I doubt RAZBAM is ever going to come back to DCS, after what happened. If indeed the Rafale is coming, my best guess, with the complexity involved at least 2 years before we see EA.

Zugegebenermaßen habe ich die letzten Monate den Markt nicht so sehr verfolgt, da ich Ende letztes Jahr gekauft habe. Aber mein letzter Stand war, das man mit "traditionellen" Klischees zu AMD und Intel nicht mehr weit kommt und das aktuelle Bild eigentlich so aussieht, dass man in nahezu jeder Hinsicht, und ganz besonders in Richtung Gaming schon ein eingefleischter Intel Fan sein muss, um überhaupt darüber nachzudenken keinen AMD zu nehmen.

@sleighzy all other sources that I read recommended to run it as admin ....