All Activity

+1 to this! I too have been around since the good old Flanker days, eagerly awaiting every new tutorial he'd put out, downloading the track file showing how -- after the obligatory "I have control" -- to seemingly effortlessly dodge SAMs and AAMs. Very much hoping that the new Fulcrum brings you back in a more active capacity!

Попробовал в ДВБ 1 на 1 против бота F-15 (уровень ветеран) с ракетами AIM-7М. Себе подвесил Р-27ЭР, чтобы иметь преимущество. Высота 4500 м. Чтож, ДВБ на МиГ-29 реально. Правда если противник с воробьями, а не амраамами. И если у лётчика МиГ-29 есть ситуационная осведомленность о положении противника. СПО-15 и правда бесполезен в ДВБ. При включённой своей РЛС, вражеское излучение не видит и не предупреждает о пуске по мне. Пускал Р-27ЭР с 20-25км. Визуально наблюдал пуск Воробья по мне и делал кадушку. Моя ракета долетала первой. Из 3 попыток-3 победы. С амраами тактику не пробовал ещё.

Why would it appear only within gun employment range?

Interesting interview with a Fulcrum- pilot describing the insaine alpha capabilities against western jets, scroll to 35 min 15 sek in video

Thanks a lot for the info, very helpful !

Fuel selector and magneto positions of the actual position, flaps on an axis, ability to use the mouse scroll wheel on gauges (i.e. altimeter) and trim (rather than just clicking and dragging), starter cover toggle, guns inboard on/off, guns outboard on/off, guns center on/off, RH release toggle, LH release toggle, pylon release toggle, guns charge toggle would be super helpful also. The only light switch I've gotten to work on a binding are the cockpit lights. None of the following bindings work -> pitot heat switch, exterior light switch, wing, tail, formation, section, approach, and recognition lights. They are bound to a button box, but don't move or operate at all and still have to be clicked with the mouse. Wonder if you guys could swap the right and left mouse button clicks so they matches all the other modules. In other modules left click turns switches off/down and right click turns switches on/up and but in this module it's opposite. Thanks guys have a great day and keep kicking ass!

Countermeasures not needed comrade, I drink the radar magic cooling fluid Wow that's quite something didnt know that, like i can imagine the prototype not having any but actual production aircraft for front line squadrons, esp 1983 it was a very hot time that's quite something if what you state is accurate. More you know about it more you get that foxbat feeling of headline stats but limited combat application, then again i guess 91 and the Iraqi airforce demonstatrated actual capability and combat effectiveness of both 25 and 29's against was was classed as a peer adversay with the 4th gen F15/F16/F18, then again in the Balkans later in the 90s. Add in the DL/C3 stuctures for the timeframe, starts to make sense just how vunerable they where, and also why many fled west to Iran. Ps before a rivet corrects me on how the coolant worked on the 29 and what it was, this was a poor attempt at humour.

Gotta second both of these sentiments, and also this FF Mig-29A is pretty damn fun to fly once you get past the annoyance of the Autopilot BIT. Really that is just an issue if you are one of us weirdos who absolutely insists on cold starting your aircraft for every flight.

No new Mig29 doesn't work with current latest OB release.

...or, a thought: make a PRMG group that you can latch onto the runway instead of doing all the script and draw acrobatics to get them into the right places.

You'd have to dial DCS's FFB down to "0" in the controler menu(FF Tune) then it will work*. At least for me that did it.(I have the Moza AB9 Base with the Warthog stick from TM) *I did that with "Shake" and "Trimmer Force", maybe you'd only need one of the two to be switched off.

Rusian dont build new versions about Kutnesov Su-25 UBK carrier capable, that has only carry fuel tanks and gun removed. On fact, the only "weapon capable" carrier trainer was de Mig-29KUBR from 2016

You can be disappointed, but please don't make false statements. We do care, but it is more a matter of resources. I will chase up any plans on any MFD issues. But please keep it constructive. Could you DM me the bug report you are referencing? Thanks.

Issue reproduced and reported. Thank you, gents.

В наличии: Удлинители - S form, прямые 200мм - переходники под гайку и в трубу для Ультимата. В производстве: Удлинители - S form, прямые 150-200мм, переходники для Трасмастеров и Ультимата под гайку 36х2. Переходник для ВинВингса отправим тестеру для оценки. Напомним, наши изделия, в веду своих прочностных характеристик, не для пружинных баз. Они предназначены прежде для FFB устройств производства Виктора "Мусульманина" и Дмитрия Козлова. Связь тут или Телега @TRV67GIR

Nei mesi scorsi ho avuto questo problema ma un mio amico mi aveva detto che ne soffrirà anche lui e poi con la famosa patch che ha richiesto il riavvio di window erano spariti. Ora sono due volte che tento di volare con il fulcrum e mi capita questa situazione, volevo chiedervi sta capitando anche a voi? O mi devo preoccupare?

If I manually enter the coordinates into the inertial system, there won't be a problem. For me, it's effortless and even more interesting. The altimeter pressure setting has no effect on the Maverick's launch.

Пытался полетать одинаковые миссии на том и этом. Мне тоже так кажется. Ещё показалось, что для схожих маневров требуется меньше топлива, ну как следствие.

Полет по азимуту это частный случай , как правило возврата на аэродром . Поставил стрелку в ноль и полетел . И совмещать ничего не надо . Это не полет по маршруту. Место в зоне выдерживается тоже по отсечным азимутам и дальностям . Но это основы навигации для третьего класса средней школы ))

I would think it would be the exact same one from FC3, is that one not working?

Nah, I use the "release joystick in strange position" trick often enough that I would miss it if covered the sensor. Aside from this issue with the BIT test, I have never seen any reason to modify, change, or replace my joystick. Definitely never noticed a deadzone issue, but that might be because I have not had experience with newer, more precise joysticks, or just that I've been using this one for so long I'm used to it. I can tell you that I enjoy using unguided weapons, and I am able to employ what I consider to be an incredible amount of precision when doing so. I recently replaced my Thrustmaster TWCS throttle because it wasn't precise enough so I do pay attention to such things.

Fair Point. I missed that. I installed a brand new clean install of DCS to test with. Loading it to the game main menu got 96 errors. After flying the su-25t and P-51 I had 140 errors. 117 of those errors are those negative drag errors. Each time I fly a new aircraft I get new errors for them. This makes if much more difficult to find errors you can fix. Even though this is a very complicated program, with many different 3rd party developers, they should periodically have everyone clean up their errors! I'm going to install all of my modules today, and see how many errors I get. I'm guessing around 300...

It is a slick bird for sure.

Hello Actium, tried the safe version, creating the new entries in the registry, unfortunately it still insists on downloading again. I shall try the other solution as soon as I feel more confident and after gathering enough information about what I am doing by making these changes (in order not to damage something). I thank you for help and taking time!

You're missing out. The latest Iraq update is pretty good, and Germany makes you tear up the first time you take out a helicopter there. I hope you get a new system soon!