All Activity

Here's the thing: a lot of military radio traffic basically is puzzle-like pieced together phrases. Sure, the 'seams' of these bits could be done better, but that is less of a 'we need AI to synth new audio in real time' problem and more of a sound design problem. The other important thing is, that as far as I'm concerned, the 'poor intonation and lack of variety in phrasing' just frankly is the least important of the weak points of DCS' radio communications. Is there some potential in it? Sure, I guess. But I feel it is wasting resources (both in dev time and in user computer power) on the wrong things.

Russia has started a full blown war against Finland, Norway and Sweden. You are a part of a coalition force called Polar Shield, consisting of these countries. As a Viper pilot, you have been sent to Evenes Air Base to be a part of the RNoAF 334 squadron. Defend Northern Europe against Russian aggression. Get to flight line and see what missions we have for you today. Polar Shield is a 24 mission campaign spanned over a year (march 2016 - feb 2017) in a fictional war between Russia and Northern Europe. This campaign consist of 5 main types of mission (CAP, CAS, Missile Defence, Pinpoint Strike and Sea Patrol). When you start a mission, you will get the option to pick from 3 different mission types, where CAP is always one of them, and the last two is a random mix of the last four. Each mission type consists of a variety of different sub missions (which will be generated randomly), so you will never get the same mission, since enemy and allied spawns are random. Download: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3347247/ A big thank you to @Don Rudi. I really appreciate your valuable insights during beta testing.

Подозреваю что на западных самолетах мозги вычисляют прицельную информацию более точно и в более широком диапазоне под текущие параметры полета , поэтому система не так требовательна к жесткому соблюдению каких то условий сброса . Но это лишь мое предложение , судя по тому как на них легко бомбить .

It is. Just do as you said and check....the world gets bigger / smaller as in opposite to change the IPD on a headset, which just moves the lenses without changing the scale. So yes, the IPD in Game is just to adjust the scale to your liking. I e.g. use the ingame IPD to match my to scale panels to the actual cockpit view, which has nothing to do with your inter pupil distance.

Does it duplicate the gun's trigger? These are probably local upgrades by MiG users.

Подозреваю что CCIP хоть в F-18 хоть в F-35 требует того же самого.

Need an urgent option to disable/enable it in the re-arm menu. There is currently no way to disable it quickly if you want to fly a 3rd party mission online and not planning on using it.

It's just a different way of achieving the same thing.

Вот как?! Очень интересно!

Hello, No tacview installed No Winwing devices All missions and others campaigns works very well on my PC

Thanks sleighzy that's exactly what I was looking for. I just watched AnyTimeBaby's videos on installation, setup and use. Wow! Much better then I could have imagined...

Alright, it does say it that way. But anyway, it seems like SPOs usefullness in such situation is questionable at best Manual SU-27SK said "False information may be displayed", not " Malfunction ". It's wrong translating and understanding. Manual prove that SPO-15 DO NOT SHUTDOWN by the radar, only false information may occur. Here is original pages of the manual: Here is correct translating: When RLPK and L006LM are operating simultaneously, false information may be displayed on the L006LM indicator (display of bearing marks 10, 30, 50, 90 on the left and right, type X, power gradations up to 8, marks V, H, and CAPTURE). To determine the actual situation, it is necessary (if possible) to set the ILLUM-EKV-OFF switch on the RLPK control panel to the OFF position for 5-10 seconds during the search and target detection stages.

Про бомбы. Тестил самые распространенные , которые много кидал и в жизни . Это ОФАБ-250-270 . Тут надо понимать , что режим ОПТ - земля хоть с ПЗ хоть без . это вам не CCIP в Ф-18 . И хоть есть и линия разлета и предвычисленная точка падения - далеко не факт что бомба ляжет именно туда. А чтобы она легла именно туда , нужно собллюсти еще все условия сброса , коими являются скорость , угол пикирования , высота/ дальность , скольжение , крен . Плюс поправки , если без ПЗ. И если хоть один из этих параметров не соблюден , то воронка будет не совсем там где вам нарисовано на ИЛС . Поэтому тренировки и только . С пятого , шестого раза я поджег пару БТРов . Вряд ли бы я это смог повторить в настоящем самолете ))

Same issue, sent WW a ticket and got back the link for .64 which didn't work. Took a shot and downloaded .25 and the sync worked. Updated .25 to .65 and the sync stayed with DCS, still working.

Here I played with the old Migu template from ED so that it would go as well as possible with the new 3D model for creating skins or reworking them from FC3 to Fulkrum. download here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_vi0SW0IpTL1YkP1y3AJTO_nmjKckgOR/view?usp=sharing

Bump Tried using the NS430 for the very first time and came across this issue too. When you enter a flight plan via FPL, hitting the button again should bring you back to NAV. This is how the real device works.

Alternatively if completely blocked in the launcher you have the following options to disable it and bypass it so that DCS will startup without it. Add "--no-launcher" as an argument to your DCS shortcut. or Edit the Saved Games\DCS\Config\options.lua file and set the ["launcher"] option to false, e.g. ["launcher"] = false. If you edit the file make sure to do it with Notepad++ and not Nodepad. You can reenable the launcher again later on under the Misc. tab in the DCS settings.

+1 A built-in 3D NS430 would be a nice addition when using the UH-1 in civil scenarios.

Just for interrest. What is it, that some people hate of "AI nonsence" in that context? Don´t you like what SayIntensions AI or BeyondATC have shown? I mean sure there are year old systems which are way better than DCS but the puzzle-like, pieced-together radio calls with poor intonation and a lack of variety in phrasing still remain a weak point. So don´t you think that there is great potential?

Nothing new? Would love to have more Skins, to bring more life in the Fliegerhorste.

Открываешь трек, как миссиию в редакторе, выбираешь нужный самолет и смотришь, какие частоты прописаны на каналах. (И смотришь датакартридж, используемый в данном самолете.) Trk файл переименовываешь сначала в "имя.zip" (треки, миссии - это zip архивы), открываешь его как архив, и удаляешь все файлы и папки содержащие в имени track. Щас точно не помню. То ли один файл То ли один файл и одна папка Буду дома посмотрю. После того, как из архива удалил все, что относится к треку, переименовываешь файл в "имя.miz", открываешь в редакторе и смотришь. Вообще, наверное, можно не удалять содержимое трека, а просто переименовать файл из "имя.trk" в "имя.miz". Наверное, должен открыться в редакторе. Да, серверные треки автоматом пишутся в соответствующую папку. В Saved Games она легко находится. Просто сейчас не помню ее точное название. Я, в одно время, часто брал серверные треки, делал из них миссии, изучал и тренировался.

Yes, I searched before posting and got the same conclusions about hay bale temperature, they can heat up but not that much and not in germany weather. Through FLIR, distant bales look like a BTR with infantry, they are even brighter

I’m confused. Can’t you just inverse the trim bindings in DCS to match your physical device? Do I miss the problem here?

One of our squadron mates likes to refuel the Hornet inverted.

The synthetic numbers are skewed. And as for price I picked mine (AceMagic Tank03) up on newegg for $635.XX about 4 months ago. A complete bargain. It replaced my sons MSI GL75 Leopard (10th Gen)w 1660ti