All Activity
- Past hour
-
DCS Not Showing In Quest Link Apps
Desert Drydock replied to Desert Drydock's topic in Virtual Reality
Thanks for the reply sleighzy. As I was further investigating my issue after I posted here earlier, I learned that Windows 10 doesn't support mixed reality. So I'm just going to box the Quest 3S up and send it back. Its clearly time to build a new PC designed around supporting the Meta Quest 3 512GB in DCS. It would have been nice to learn about this before I ordered the Quest 3S but as usual, I like doing the hard and more expensive way. -
Thanks for the report. Fixed it internally, will be available in one of the upcoming updates.
-
In this first image I can't see the target at all. He's at 1300kph TAS and we're at a 2755kph closure rate. For the second case, target is flying at a 30-ish degree crank and I'm able to see him just fine at a 2200kph closure rate and the target also at 1300kph TAS. Now for the third trackfile, the target is at 552 TAS and the closure at a 1652km/h closure rate, and I was able to find and lock the target just fine
-
There are no stupid questions. The DCE settings are not really user friendly ^^. What's more, when you try to add or correct things, it often breaks something else
- 4168 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- mbot
- dynamic campaign
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Can you please add binds for: - Analogue axis for the HUD brightness - On/off for Show Pilot Body
-
JAS 39C Gripen Community Mod
Freakmeister51 replied to whisky.actual's topic in Flyable/Drivable Mods for DCS World
I have also had a successful flight in the Gripen, with no issues.- 498 replies
-
- 1
-
-
Yes it is, TDC range
-
Kans joined the community
- Today
-
So if it wasn't fitted to "this version" then at what range is the delta H value referenced to ? is as has been suggested (and in game evidence supports this) it is referenced to the Acquisition cursor range ? Is this a yet to be implemented feature ? or what we are stuck with ? The "correct as is" label and the quote above from Matt in the post above to this thread implies its not going to be incorporated. .... a definitive statement here would help. Elevation changing as you try to position the acquisition cursor over the target makes it almost unmanageable in free search type operation. Probably OK in the guidance mode with DL doing the work for you. I guess TWS is the go as then I presume elevation will be controlled by the TWS mode itself ?
-
-
As far as I’m aware the manual describes the limits of speeds for each radar mode as “detection of air targets flying at speeds,” it is not “detection of air targets flying at speeds plus your own speed (absolute closure.) So for MPRF front aspect it’s 270-1100 kmh. This means that no matter the speed of the MiG-29 it should detect a target up to 1101 kmh. If you look at lower of speed ranges for each mode, the low end is the notch speeds, which means it’s the target speed in reference to the earth, not your closure speed. Referencing L-18 and German manual. As well as Russian 9.12/13 manual.
-
As title says, the Mig-29 Radar is not able to see targets in Medium PRF (PURSUIT) if the closure is too high even after a certain point. If the closure is lower, I'm able to start seeing the target in MPRF. However, if we're both head-on and at high speed, the target is literally invisible to the radar even pre-merge. I have attached 3 track files. One with high closure rate and the target being in a head-on aspect, no contact whatsoever before the merge. Second one is with the target in a crank with medium-ish closure and I'm able to see him just fine. Third is with the target head-on but maintaining a very low speed, also able to get contact at about 38km. Thanks in advance. HIGH_CLOSURE_HEAD_ON.trk MEDIUM_CLOSURE_CRANKING.trk MEDIUM_CLOSURE_HEAD_ON.trk
-
sling loading cargo touches ground and fly's up in the air
Moezilla replied to badatthis's topic in General Bugs
@Laxxor are you still seeing this issue with bouncing cargo? -
Well of course now it seems to be working. Maybe just pure luck I was getting completely clear skies so often. Thanks for replying and putting up with my stupid questions.
- 4168 replies
-
- mbot
- dynamic campaign
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I've got the latest...553 I think? I've been messing more with it, so I'll generate a new mission.
- 4168 replies
-
- mbot
- dynamic campaign
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Best sp campaigns available for dcs imo.
-
В чём суть этой темы? Кто и где собирает баги? Где посмотреть статус по багу?
-
i've a pimax crystal light, i don't want to buy the slug + the leap etc...
-
Thanks, seems to have sorted itself and lets me progress now. It did the same at the end of 3a but that has now progressed too.
-
All WW2 artillery and AAA has implemented the Tow mode, but the towing ability has actualy none implemented on WW2. Has some WW2 tower tractors on axis and allied, but dont have the tow abilitiy. Has actualy as some buided modern tow tractors, but missing fuel modern trailers.
-
Bye Phant
- 28 replies
-
thebeast92 joined the community
-
Same question, 2 years later, so I'm guessing not at this point. Still a great mod, though! Thanks!
-
Great footage, almost one hour of Bitburg Eagles flying action in and around Bitburg AB, Germany.
-
- 1
-
-
h1tm4n joined the community
-
Pretty sure the RSBN unit was existing as well. But yes - it's only further proof that these could be added, the models have been present in game for over a decade.
-
Record a short track and we can start from there