All Activity

The problem may simply be that I'm cheap. Not sure why I started with DCS on Steam, but it has always worked for me so I stick with it. And I like the Steam wallet function. I'm surprised the Standalone version doesn't have it.

I had a conversation via Email of the representative of the protest movement against the TRAs Eifel and Lauter. They told me that they were affected by inacceptable noise levels due to military training flights starting in the 80s (because that is how far back they can remember, meaning they could have been there before that as well). It has to be mentioned that it could also have been flights moving through the nighttime flying corridor system that leads straight through that area as well. Additionally, I have found these images: This image is from the book series by Frank W. Fischer, indicating that there have been 3 TRAs in the greater area around Ramstein AB. Then there is this image laying out the dimensions of TRA 204 Eifel. This is the layout that appears again after the 1989 VFR charts that you used for your CWG miz template @Volator. This also seems to be in place all the way until TRA204 was closed down again in the early 2000s. This is what TRA205/305 looked like up until the change in the early 2000s. This layout seems to reach back until 1989 at the very longest as indicated by @Volator's VFR chart again. The layout of the both TRAs next to each other and an internal memo about the negotiations at the time (again early 2000s so this would be reaching back some time but at most until 1989) And an excerpt showing a reunified Germany featuring both TRAs Eifel and Lauter, and the old layouts for the TRAs in the North. I have not been looking into the TRAs around Hamburg yet as I have been focusing on trying to research layouts for the TRAs most relevant to our day to day training routines. It has to be said that the source most accurate to the time the CWG map is set in, is @Volator's 1989 chart, and that what I posted here is only the beginning point (the original image from Frank W. Fischer's books) and the end with the relatively recent changes to TRA205/305 and the dissolution of TRA204. I am awaiting answers to requests from the german Bundesarchiv on airspace layouts during the mid 70s and the 80s but I would not get my hopes up on that front. For our purposes in JaboG35 the addition of TRA204 is very important as it does provide us with more playground space that doesn't break immersion for us. Considering that the original TRA layout (from Frank W. Fischer's documentation) indicates that there were three TRAs even, this is an acceptable compromise to us internally. I do encourage you all to read the books about Rhein Control however, as they are extremely thorough and very well illustrated.

Are you referencing a Typhoon mod? This module hasn't been released and probably won't be for a few years..

Io sono più ottimista di te, dico dicembre

+1. especially for the route lines and waypoints. Blue against a blue sea background doesn't make for easy visibility.

There might be a bug in a certain situation, but it works fine for me.

Cold start null

There is a great MP campaign for South Atlantic in Retribution turn based Dynamic Campaign System. You should check this one ! For a more MP casual flight Through The Inferno (TTI) is great too.

On Steam it says Pre-Purchase DCS: MiG-29A Fulcrum PRE-PURCHASE PROMOTION! Offer ends 30 September

I tested it with a hot start and everything works. I'll test it with a cold start. null

It's not an error. Steam shows -13% from EA price. ED store shows -30% from final release price.

SOLVED

You are correct. The other manual is a translation of the Yugoslavian L-18 manual, so includes chapters on combat use that GAF lacks.

There are two things that keep me up at night about SPO-15 Let’s tell ED what we think! Most important, there are warning in manual and some pilot reports that radar can POSSIBLY overspill to RWR. But the manual doesn’t say it will happen only a warning that it might, and I have talked to pilots who said that they did not experience this. So it seems to me this is down to sync circuits being off, and possibly needing replacement or maintenance. Therefore, it should not be modeled as default this way in DCS MiG-29. second, there is supposition that it may not detect Fox 1 launch by F-14/15/18. The manual mentions being able to know when Nike Hercules has launched on it by its datalink signals, so that is the only one that can be confirmed. Some say F-14/15/18 don’t change illumination when firing Sparrow. But I was reading APG-65 manual the other day and there were lots of references to “PDI ( pulse Doppler illumination)” needing to be injected to both tune and guide the Sparrow. I am assuming perhaps that we may not be able to see Fox 1 launch on the “stock” ME setting but see it on the automatic one with the assumption that the details of this PDI have been loaded into it. But really, haven’t redfor suffered enough? Not even SPO-10 has RF overspill! The radar is only on 25% of the time! That should be no issue for sync circuits! Redfor has suffered and suffered. I would much prefer there were atleast options available for us to not have a RWR that can’t be used with radar or will not see Fox 1 launch (forcing us to rely on the estimated missile tag, that assumes they have fired on us at 3 bars signal strength and shows an approximate missile closure from that point, however useful that might be for longer range fox 3 shots). Interested if anyone has anything to add. And to show ED how much having a RWR that sees its own radar and can’t see missile launch would be ill received from a large portion of the player base expecting something that atleast does its job however imprecise! Su-27 manual also mentions possible interference from radar, but in addition to saying “POSSIBLE,” also says it can be solved by turning radar off and back on. I would be fine if this happens say every 10th radar cycle. But every time????

Allego le foto. Tutto perfettamente funzionante, conservato e usato sempre con cura. La ruota del trim non presenta alcun problema.

According to my original VFR charts from 1989 there was no TRA204. It must therefore have been before 1989.

Is there any difference in the two manuals? The NATO manual probably is the GAF manual that is also available from other sources, right? What is the other manual?

Я конечно ни на что не намекаю, но проц i5 6400 вышел в 2015 году летом. Я думаю что его пора уже менять

nobody in particular, but the only evidence you have shown that i can see is with the A4E,, show a track with an F/A-18 or a Tomcat and you have yourself a different argument... my 0.02GBP

Annoys me since long. Someone somewhere mentioned that before, but until now no reaction from ED side...

Will LCDs work in VR? I want to look at them through the lower gap of my Quest

Я и не против покупать обновления моделей, поддерживая разработчиков! Даже за Су-25 заплатил бы, если бы его решили продавать, а не бесплатным делали

I have responded to this post earlier, but just to add that I experienced the same overwhelming frustration when I first came to DCS, I would pull off a fantastic dogfight win only to discover, to my dismay, that the track 'replay' differed wildly from reality. Yes, one of the myriad of track breaking variables is the module in use. ED has said many, many times that the track replay system was never intended as a 'proper' replay system as in MSFS / X-Plane (et al) and until they have the development time to address the anomalies we simply have to live with the altered reality that is track replay.

nullI partecipanti del SimGamingExpo 2025 di Chicago stanno provando in anteprima il C-130J. Settembre sarà il mese del MIg-29, non ci rimane che sperare per Ottobre a questo punto!

The Reverb headsets are good, and I ran one for years. I'd recommend the PSVR2 now, if you can stretch to it. The comfort is better (although subjective) and most importantly it can now do dynamic foveated rendering which will get you the most bang for the buck out of your current hardware.