All Activity

Please attach your DCS log file for review, this may be a separate issue in which case you can raise your own post.

Why do this? I also have a WinWIng Orion 2 with F-16 grip but I set up my Afterburner detents in the SimApp software like this:

das kann sein.

Für „Altitude hold“ muss zunächst „Attitude hold“ aktiviert werden.

I really appreciate that since the beta Wags showed you guys removed the flashing HMS graphics. Thank you for listening to the feedback.

Not sure I understand. Why do you use buttons if you have an axis to assign?

Just something I noticed. Not a big deal, but I thought I would pass it along. Love this map.

I've now lost count of how many reports like this I've read about that shower of sht.

Yeah I did not say, there is no problem with a broken Tail wheel. Its obvious that there is one and that they mentioned it as fixed although it is not, is bad. Politely spoken. But again, when there is no wind, the Aircraft turns, at least good enough to manouver on the ground as you need. So if the tailwheel was restricted due to that spawn damage, why should this be only a problem when you try to turn against the wind? Even a fully functional tailwheel does not give any aditional force to fight the wind. The initial turn on that Nellis transfer flight mission is absolutely no problem and the diff brakes are very responsive.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooT-qFhasLg

I retried this week. No luck. wingman, doesn't move at all.

Hi, After installing the Mig-29A, it's not logging any flight time in my log book. All flights have been single player. Checked the "logbook.lua" file and the Mig-29A isn't listed there. Any thoughts? Regards, John

It's the exact right size as it is IRL. Zoom in.

Until the update I had game units set to imperial but when flying soviet birds (except 29G) I still had them in native units and all was fine. Now I have to change between units depending on which aircraft I fly?

Don't touch anything when Afcs does it's thing. I use joystick without FF and no problems so far. Successful bit first time. Now i am not sure about FF. Maybe it can create problem, but should not output force if nothing is resisting ?

Hello, I would like to report a problem with the speed of the MiG 29. The MiG 29 does not accelerate that much, it is much slower, this module of the MiG 29 has astronomical performance that needs improvement. Secondly, the MiG 29 loses speed very poorly in real life, it loses speed much faster. Regards.

I did some more testing, and I need to clarify my earlier post a bit. After flying around for a while and trimming in pitch for various flight regimes, I find the roll trim to no longer be centred for whatever reason and I need to readjust. I also feel regular uncommanded roll but that could also be caused by the difference in spool up/down speeds of the 2 engines causing a roll momentum. I'll need to look a bit deeper into how the FCS works, since there's a damper but it doesn't seem to have any authority in the roll channel - unless I'm missing something...

Caveat Emptor: Winwing Flight Sim Hardware Company: Chengdu WinWing Tech Co., LTD Product: Orion2 HOTAS StrikeAce EX FL Order Date: August 15, 2025 Delivery Date: August 22, 2025 Package Condition: Delivered undamaged and unopened Summary of Concern Despite receiving a shipping confirmation and a tracking number that showed only one package being shipped, the delivered package from Winwing contained only two of the four critical components: the Stick Grip and Throttle Grip. The Stick Base and Throttle Base were missing, rendering the HOTAS system incomplete and unusable. Timeline of Events Aug 15: Order placed and paid in full Aug 16: Received email confirming shipment via UPS Aug 22, 4:48 PM: One package delivered Aug 22, 4:50 PM: One package retrieved immediately, undamaged and unopened Upon opening: Only two items were present; both bases are missing Aug 22, 4:56 PM: Support ticket created; chat initiated with Winwing Provided photos of package labels and contents—labels confirmed only two items shipped Winwing rep stated they would contact the carrier Aug 25, 12:28 AM: Winwing replied: “Carrier feedback they have delivered all items” From Aug 25 to Sept 15, chatted with three separate reps—polite but evasive Repeatedly requested escalation; finally granted on Sept 15, 2:12 AM Escalated response echoed previous claim: “The order items were all shipped and delivered” Sept 13, 6:37 PM: Provided a UPS snapshot showing only two items in the one package shipment Policy vs. Practice Winwing’s own customer support page states: “When you meet any problem in deliver like package miss, deliver fault. Please don't worry, we will make sure you get your gear finally in anyway.” Despite this assurance, no corrective action was taken. The company leaned on carrier confirmation rather than addressing the actual contents of the package. This suggests a failure to uphold their own delivery guarantee and a reluctance to acknowledge internal shipping errors. Analysis Winwing appears to have a systemic issue in their shipping department and a pattern of deflecting responsibility. Their support team, while courteous, repeatedly dismissed the discrepancy between what was shipped and what was confirmed delivered. The lack of accountability undermines buyer confidence. Recommendations for Buyers Document everything: Save emails, take timestamped photos of packaging and contents Verify shipment contents immediately upon delivery Request escalation early and insist on written confirmation Consider alternative vendors with proven fulfillment and support reliability Share your experience to help others make informed decisions

Al di là del discorso ritorno economico, posso assicurarvi che il 339 non è nel dimenticatoio e il nano è in lavorazione, anche se abbiamo avuto molti intoppi, di natura personale e non solo che in questi mesi ha rallentato il lavoro in generale di IFE che è comunque su due piattaforme diverse, con tutti i ragazzi che lavorano come "secondo lavoro" Concordo in pieno Ma d'altronde DCS è un sandbox, sta all'utilizzatore finale creare uno scenario credibile e fattibile con determinati tipi di aereo. Mi ricollego al discorso dell AV8B, come giocatore l'ho usato veramente tanto in passato, un aereo molto piacevole e per nulla scontato anche in scenari più moderni, ma ho sempre desiderato vere un plus un giorno. Purtroppo ho paura che al momento il sogno non si realizzerà

It should work with ground power. I'm couple of days away from my rig so can't test right now. If there someone can help before that would be great. If not I'll get back in couple of days.

Not sure since I use full Russian+metric. Never tried different. You need go convert all measurement settings to native/russian and metric. Then it will work. And full English+ imperial if you want opposite. Mixing tends to create something wierd.

I think it's best to keep the default options the way they are for other Russian ED modules, and optionally add a convenience option to have imperial units for those who so desire (I personally find that more immersion breaking than an English cockpit but that's just me).

Половина - это громко конечно! Но есть неработающие. Но про них в доке написано "Не моделируется" (не N/I, а именно не моделируется) Например: Таких пультов я видел в доке, штуки 4. И по двум из них у меня сразу проскочило в голове, типа, а нафига их моделировать-то в симуляторе? Разработчикам огромное спасибо за документацию на русском языке! В раннем доступе естественно она еще неполная. Но и за эту - спасибо! Читать доку к долгожданной модели самолета - огромное удовольствие!

Use the HDD to your right side. Exists exactly for that in real life, improve readability

Hi Andre. Is the latest version supporting the new Mig 29? if not can we expect an update soon. Hoping to fly the new mig29 for the first time this evening. Thanks for your good work.