All Activity

It's been a minute. Is this ever coming out? I had a skin in mind but not sure if I should wait or just use the kit in user files. Can you at least tell us if it's this year?

Of course

Please take a scan here:

Totally noob question. I bought the F1 as soon as it was available but I haven't actually use it until this summer, and I'm having a blast. Used to the F18's avionics and SA, flying this third generation jet is super fun. I've done Carsten's tutorial, read the manual and flight a lot a custom cold war sandbox mission I made. Now I started a retribution campaign and I have realized I cannot do proper CAP since I don't really know how to operate iff, use AWACS nor build a proper SA picture. In my custom sandbox I didn't have this issue since I know more or less where my allied are and the general heading where enemies might be. But in the retributions missions I have already shoot down my own AWACS twice My main problem is the AWACS in on the same general heading as the bandits and more or less at the same altitude and distance as the reported bandit. So what I do is to lock the first "suspicious boogie" I get on my radar, and with it locked I has AWACS to declare. It responds "contact is unknonwn", so I assume since it is not detected as friendly it must be a bandit... turns out the contact was the AWACS itself. Long story short, can I rely on AWACS' "declare" call? And if I can, how should I properly do it? For context, I fly the EE in missions set around 1985 and the bandits are usually migs (Warsaw Pact available aircraft). And I cannot interrogate mysenf since the EE does not have the proper equipment, does it? Thanks!

Ещё пример хорошенько потрёпанного 29-го. Кабины любят быть обшарпанными. Миг-27 вообще эталон!

уважаемые разработчики дайте пожалуста инормацыю про су-25, спасибо

I am currently working on other projects, hopefully this winter I can resume working on the planned "F-5E: Expansion" Modules. Core AI, Player FCS and Player DCS Are planned for the first release, after which the Player Remastered version, if at all, due to models being encrypted. Since putting it on pause I've learned several new things that will aid in quicker turn around on getting this project done quicker and cleaner.

Yeah my jaw dropped when I saw this. Is this a tease to tell us that something might be moving on the AH-6 (and Blackhawk) project? Or a flex to show us what we can't have? Love the video btw. Black Hawk down vibes are very strong.

она неправильная я бы сказал

Today is another one of those days where I pull out my Quest 3, start DCS on an i9-13900K and a 4090, and think to myself, "Today, it's just going to run smoothly..." - and I'm disappointed again. And the same loop over and over again. And I check the VD settings, check my TP-Link Archer BE550 6GHz settings, check the VD settings on the Quest, and the floor stutters like crazy during flight. I've already noticed that the movements of a wireless mouse can cause performance drops. In my frustration today, I unplugged the wireless USB transmitter on the Corsair mouse, even turned off my phone next to me to see if that might be the cause... no effect. The strange thing is, every now and then, out of the blue, I have a latency below 40, buttery smooth turns, everything is fantastic. And then, after a few hills and cities, just when I thought "FINALLY!"... it starts all over again. Rarely has a piece of software combined with hardware frustrated me so much. I've tried the smallest settings, the lowest bitrates, the fewest tasks in Windows—just about everything. The same problem remains: the cockpit looks and moves like I'm on the live set of Top Gun, and the entire scenery reminds me of my Amiga 500.

Yes, that could be it too. Someone else had a similar problem once. I've just corrected the description in the User files.

Previously, I used the grab button for the lever shown in the picture, after which the helicopter would rise into the air. The readings on this device also change (second screenshot). Now the grab button does not work to grab the lever.

Os dejo el enlace a un podcast de Motor y al Aire. Se trata de una interesante entrevista a uno de los propietarios de Aerges. Espero que os resulte interesante. https://www.ivoox.com/127-aerges-creando-aviones-digitales-audios-mp3_rf_155630619_1.html

boohoohoo hearing about the tragic story of the ah-6j mod makes me sad still, great video though

Yea but its impossible to taxi the corsair with 10 kts wind on the ground. Carrier or Airfield.

Ineed it does, but always precision factor PGM drops from 5 to 2, and the harm still finds the target with pin point precision. There must be something wrong with F-16 HARM system, and how it shows up the precision number. harm_HAD_max_PGM2.trk Simple mission attached as well. a2g_harm_accuracy_test.miz

That's exactly what you can do right now with Combined Arms.

Dear lefuneste01, I have recently activated the new PSVR2 eye tracking mod together with quad views and it works great, as it is for others: However, I've discovered that quadviews is not really working with SSAO because of a graphical glitch where the inner square is visible. This has been experienced apparently also by other users with other headsets, like the PIMAX. I've installed reshade to try to enable a SSAO shader through there, but although I can make other shaders to work in VR, just like you show in VREM, specifically the SSAO shaders do not work. I can't really make out from the first post or the rest of this thread if SSAO shaders through VREM are working in quadviews. So my question is: can I enable SSAO with quadviews, using VREM? Thanks for all your work man.

Рус явно нужно сильней обдирать, особенно рычаг тормоза: Ну и даже МиГ-21 в игре не настолько ободранный как например тут:

Никто не забывает. Обсуждался частный случай.

Amazing! It really comes alive with the upscaling. On the other hand, the AI is terrible at colorization. It just guesses the colors and usually guesses wrong. anyhow, it’s definitely worth watching

The problem with optimization is that every person plays on a different rig. If I remove the statics, it will run well for those with a lower end pc but will look plain and uninteresting for those with a good one. I’m defo not overpopulating the base, only the vicinity of the player. I can’t possibly offer and maintain several versions with different levels of statics. I need to draw the line somewhere. my theory is, if it runs OK for me, on my old laptop, in VR, then everyone must be able to run it. if you check my video, there are a few settings you can use for populated missions such as lowering the lod factor a bit. It does miracles. oh and there’s been that bug since ED moved texture loading to a different thread it struggled and stuttered, several people reported it - so again, it’s not the mission that should keep adapting every month to the current state of dcs and the player’s settings. It’s the other way around. I know tone doesn’t come accross in writing, I’m not saying this in an offensive nor in an offended, defensive way. I’m just saying what my experience in dcs and the mission editor has been like over the past 10 years.

Вообще,при разговорах об состоянии кабин, забывают что ЛА проходят регулярные ремонты, где лкп восстанавливается. Вообще самые реалистичные кабины - у последних модулей от ЕД. Самая идеальная кабина это у Ми24, у25 вообще отлично смотрится. Тут прям идеал.

Almost done with autopilot series. Master the pitch/roll autopilot, how it works with trim and the mysterious “compensation sensors” so you can fly and kill better!!!!! This should answer any questions and turn you into the machine of death!! https://youtu.be/KKJv8dDBEgU?si=DofWfL16PUbJ_ZN3

20 летние выглядят лучше… Такая облезлость, как у Томкета, один раз только мне попадалась на 60 летнем аэроплане. Если для Томкета это норма, то ладно. Это удивляет. Если немного вернуться в тему этой темы, то хорошо, что демонстрируемая кабина МиГа выглядит лишь немного б/у. Мне нравится. Или кому-то хочется её сильнее ободрать?