flavnet

Hello everyone! Please, there is a good soul that can list the procedure for using an LGB with the Litening. I followed the tutorials on Youtube and they turned out to be completely useless. I would prefer that, together with these tutorials (domesticated), there should be a .pdf file with the procedures. I know, I'm old-fashioned but, as it happens, when I read guides (as well as Chuck's), everything is crystal clear to me!!! Thanks in advance!!!

Chuck, you are now a legend! Thank you!

Please, some installation instructions. Thanks for sharing!! (I have FC3)

YEAHHHHHH!!!!

F-16 USAF camo. Old (or "three-color") Nose & intake profile: FS36118 (15% scale fade) (humbrol 156) Topside: FS36118 (humbrol 125) Sides, wingtips & vertical satbilizer: FS36270 (humbrol 126) Underside, pylons & drop tanks: FS36375 (humbrol 127) New (or "two-color) Nose & intake profile: FS36118 (15% scale fade) (humbrol 156) Topside: FS36118 (humbrol 125) Overall: FS36270 (humrol 126) P.S. many drop tanks still in FS36375 (humbrol 127 or light ghost grey)

"mu110" many thanks for your reply!!!

Hello everyone! A question about the ECM pods used by the F-16. I have noticed that the most used are AN / ALQ 131 and AN / ALQ 184. Which of the two is the most modern and which are the differences also regarding the missions to be performed. Thanks in advance for the information and good waiting for the Viper!

About the video: F-16 best fighter ever!! :) :)

F-16 Fighting Falcon Units of Operation Iraqi Freedom OSPREY Publishing COMBAT AIRCRAFT 61 Author: Doug Dildy, Steve Davies Illustrator: Chris Davey Short code: COM 61 Publication Date: 28 Feb 2006 ISBN: 9781841769943 Format: Paperback Number of Pages: 96 Very good ... and also for me: Falcon 4.0 manual. I was lucky enough to have bought it back in 1998 and it is still a reference for those who want to know more about the Viper. By the way, this manual can be found in pdf format on the internet.

Sorry, what is the CV module???:noexpression:

Hello everyone! Are the crew animations on the aircraft carrier not yet available but only announced? True?

Personally, in a scenario like the Persian Gulf, I think the lack of the Iranian navy is a real problem to be corrected as soon as possible.

Hello everyone! I have just written some criticisms of the new PFM. Well, after the right training, now I can only praise this PFM!!! I have documented myself, also thanks to the excellent users of this forum, and I can say that the new flight model is much more faithful (and fun) than the previous one. Now I land naturally following the few and simple rules necessary. Teaching: you must always train before criticizing. Thank you all for the useful advice !!

Great job!!! Many many Thanks!!!

https://www.cybermodeler.com/aircraft/f-14/images/f-14_vf-84_1981.png

The video confirms what I wrote above: with 2, 3, 4, 5, etc. JDAM you cannot hit 2, 3, 4, 5, etc. targets in a single pass. In the video, moreover, is used the TOO mode which would be practical only if the map of the editor was suitable for providing the decimals of the second of degree. In fact with this mode you can create waypoints directly on the targets and associate them to the release points of the JDAM. Currently this way does not guarantee the necessary accuracy for bombs because the map does not provide the necessary type of coordinates.

I've tried them all, but with "n" JADAM you just can't get "n" targets in a single pass. As I read above, although I have meticulously followed the instructions on Youtube (and also on this forum), in the programming of the bomb release there is no way to permanently associate the single station (STAx) with the single program (PPy). Therefore, when you reach the release point (IN RNG), selecting, for example, PP1 you discover that it is associated with the last programmed STA (STA8, for example), rather than to STA1. So, if I selected PP1 and push the release button, the STA8 bomb will be dropped, then I switch to PP2 and see that it is also associated with STA8, so I can't drop it. To do this, I will have to associate PP2 to STA2 (or another that has a bomb). Nothing to do with a multiple bombardment in a single pass!!! I look forward to an improvement on this incredible F-18 weapon.

I hope for a solution that does not force me to go back to the previous video drivers.

Same problem. But with the CBU-99!!!

THE AMAZING CHUCK!!!!

I created a mission to test the JDAMs and finally managed to destroy all targets!! The secret is all in the right coordinates to use to program the bombs. And these coordinates are not in the format that is read on the simulator maps (sigh!) Thank you all for sharing their knowledge !!

Thanks GrEaSeLiTeNiN !!! Finally, everything is clear to me. Now I try to run a test mission to understand the procedure and we hope that in a future update more precise coordinates will be provided on the maps to skip the conversion phase (quite annoying).

Sorry Chalky but I don't understand the need to convert the coordinates. In the DCS mission editor (caucasus map), pointing the mouse at the waypoint where the target is located, the coordinates are obtained in the format x ° y 'z "N ecc... Moreover, on the pad I cannot insert MGRS coordinates and I don't understand how we can see the MGRS format on the map (I only see the format x ° y 'z "N ecc...). Last night, after the last update, I tried to perform a simple bombardment mission with JDAM (GBU 31). I only tried the TOO mode (waypoint 1 right on the target). After running all the settings in flight, I discovered that the circle no longer appears around the target waypoint and, when the release timer reaches zero and the bomb is dropped, it does not hit the target (in fact it misses a lot). I believe there is still work to be done for the JDAM.

TOO jdam mode do not work after the last update.