Nooch

Yeah it's doing it in both VR and on regular monitor. I had that too in DCS since a while ago actually. I started noticing it since June. Now I'm getting full on screen flickering it's annoying...

Other modern games use multi core much better. Going from a gtx 980 to a 1080 ti, I saw more than double the fps in pretty much all games except DCS, where the gains were marginal. It clearly shows that DCS is holding modern GPUs by quite a thick margin...

Thanks for the info mate. I just got myself a 1080 ti and was astonished to see my fps remained exactly the same as with my gtx 980... I have a 4670k (@4.2ghz) which is a slightly newer (but still old) cpu than the 2600k you had and it looks like it is holding back my graphics card like it did for you :( Other games like witcher 3 give me a 100% fps boost but because DCS is basically locked to a single core, well I'm getting no improvement.

That's an overstatement. They are smaller than AAA games like Witcher etc but "EXTRAORDINARILY"... I wouldn't go that far. But yeah certainly not big enough to make Nvidia want to spend their time optimizing their drivers for it.

That's it!! They did it! Finally! Good job Aviodev :beer:

I agree. They announced performance gains in VR in a future update. I hope this is the kind of thing they were talking about even though improvements can probably be made without VRworks too.

It should be coming in a future update.

I'm still running on a 4670k so 7600k even looks like an upgrade to me. Of course newer is better but here in your case it's perfectly fine. It's my gtx 980 which is starting to show its age now...

I agree. It's a bit early to judge on which one is more fun than the other. The F-18 still has a lot to get in terms of updates. The cool thing about the A-10C though is that it can carry more A\G ordnance. Appart from that my vote goes to the F-18. I haven't touched the Hawg much since the Hornet is out.

Like in the whole industry these days...

Picked up Normandy + ww2 assets pack

Good point. By the way there have been very recent footage (two months old or so) of F-117 still flying near Tonopah. Proof that they are indeed still flown for testing stuff.

They need to update the manual too. Last time I checked, about three months ago, the start up procedure was outdated and simply didn't work.

...Paranoia lol That's sad. I enjoyed your videos Greg. At the same time I understand and respect your decision.

FSX is surely the worst "modern" flight sim that there is in terms of flight dynamics, by a long shot. I (re)tested it two years ago and man... it was bad. Although I agree with you on the whole, no flight sim is perfect but I must admit that DCS helped me a lot when flying for the first time. I've done both helo and prop plane (taildragger and trycicle gear) and the general feel of the aircraft remained exactly the same.

Let's be careful though, "soon" can mean vastly different things depending on the person who's using it :D

Let's just hope they don't end up like VEAO...

Definitely. Most people don't get it because they have been used to it for years but at first, Track IR feels very unnatural and awkward to use. I'm sure it would have been day and night if he had been given a VR headset. The other thing is the controls and the way they were set up. Not only the switchology was completely off from the real airplane but there might have been curves on the stick and throttle that also didn't help... I respect the view of some people being unhappy that he treated the sim like a simple arcade game down the street but at the same time I kinda see why it ended up like this.

Part 2 is up

Flight model is already done. They probably will be making adjustments in the future but right now they don't seem to be working on it.

Why has this not been reported?

It has nothing to do with it. I'm getting this jitter/double vision problem a lot nowadays even though I always keep the geforce experience overlay turned off. I've also tried deleting the fxo and metashaders folders but it doesn't change anything.