amalahama

Nothing serious as I am aware of. VEAO booked the Tornado for future development but they are pretty much dead now, and there were rumours around Heatblur and Miltech but I wouldn't expect it any time soon.

I think IT should be CLEAR BY NOW?

You're not alone my friend In the meanwhile, you can kill your low level, high speed basic needs with the viggen

Cool, is there a way to check if the impact points are intervaled properly?

Hi! Although Heatblur will live through DCS history books as the first company ever providing a functional AG radar in an addon, it's not more than a band aid using a back door in the SDK not originaly thought for that. It has notorious limitations, like the imposibility to detect any structure (including runways), any civilian traffic (including oil tankers) and mismatching radar returns (for example, showing forests and water bodies in exactly the same colors - it didn't happen in 1.5). Only certains vehicles can be detected (only because they are in some sort of definition list somewhere) without taking into account if they are under vegetation or behind a building. It seems that Viggen's radar is very prone to changes on the visual core, which it's very undesirable in the long term. Plus, ED SDK will soon add a proper AG radar modelling that should overcome all these limitations and will be properly supported regardless major changes in the simulator. Does HB have plans to move AG Radar to new technology when available? Or may they improve the AG radar when the F-14 is out? I would like to know HB's plans to keep up to date this very important sensor in the viggen in the months to come.

Northrop Grumman will decide

And destroyable forests too.

The bug was originally reported on December 2017 https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=3310344#post3310344 They have developed a Mig-19 and a F-15E in the meantime, so I'm pretty sure it's easy to fix in comparison. Whatever, I only wanted to highlight this one, so it doesn't get lost in the large pile of Harrier bugs. Proper CCIP and AUTO modes is important in a mud mover like the Harrier. It's something expected working on day 1, or at least before secondary stuff like INS alignment gets implemented Regards!

Please go trolling somewhere else. This is a bug reporting post. Thanks

Uppppp. CCIP is still largely incomplete. Please RAZBAM have a look at this, it's not that hard

How amazing would be that, uh? Me, and I'm sure a bunch other pals, would throw some $$$ at ED for some Warthog candy. Regards!

It's enough. Two mothers don't assemble a baby in 4,5 months. Regards!

Let's get a proper AV-8B first.

C'mon, it won't be the first game featuring this...

Yeah it's a quite old bug and very annoying too. I hope ED fix it ASAP, otherwise AGM-65E are going to be useless in the Hornet. Regards!

As the titlte stated. And even better if ground deformation when bombing is added too. Regards!

I remember Cobra saying that it might happen... I think it makes lot of sense, the D is different enough as to charge as a new module, whilst lot of the art and system modelling would remains virtually identical. It's all down to whether enough info can be collected about the D (which seems quite a challenge)

:huh::D

It makes sense

There is nothing I would wish more than the level of quality that the Mig-21 deserves. Go Magnitude!

It would be amazing if current helos in game gets properly fixed and updated to lastest standards, especially the Ka-50.

+1!

The video remains me a lot the intro of Stranger Th...errrr... nothing :D

Will we have both, -A and -C Phoenix?

Nice! I have a thing for old green phosphorous displays, however I hoped a Tornado. I'm not disapointed though, Intruder looks indeed an interesting airframe. Good luck with Northrop!