BarTzi

No offense, but the thread is really useless without a track. If we can't see what's going on, we can't give useful advice.

You need to post a track of the issue, so we can have a better look.

Actually, there might be something wrong with it. At times, I see my req speed growing rapidly when it should not, and it seems to be related to the distance of my plane from the waypoint. That might be the issue you are having.

First, we are trying to make sure you are doing everything that's required to get it to work (my TOT is working fine). Second, do us and the community a favor and post a track, because if you don't, and it is a bug, someone else will eventually have to post a track.

What format are you using - local or zulu?

In the meantime, you can try and fix the liveries you are using. It's not a bug. It's a change purposely made by ED, so I don't think you should expect a fix.

I sure hope so. They did some of it for the F-16 (same functionality), so I was wondering why they didn't touch this part of the Hornet when they introduced 2.9

Search for VOIP in the Hornet control section and that should get you there

The Hornet has two radios in ED's VOIP - Radio 1 and 2. The plane does not have an intercom (which is used to communicate between the front and back seater), as it is a single-seater jet in DCS.

It's the only source we have, but I agree. If it's the 9K330, then I'm not sure it should be capable.

Should be possible on paper. Based on the in-game wiki, the version included in DCS is the 9K331 Tor-M1. This version is capable (again, on paper) of engaging small targets and rockets, so a small bomb is not out of scope. However, this system is also capable of engaging two targets at the same time, which is not something that we see in DCS. So what we have might be a mix of Tor and Tor-M1 in terms of capabilities.

In the real jet, the cable has to be connected by the ground crew. If we can't ask them to connect it manually, then no option was actually added, just text labels.

How can you do that?

TCN had reduced range, but it still has nothing to do with your issue with the INS.

You should post a track, because I'm getting the INS to align even then I use a nonexistent tacan freq.

I agree. ED, please make this page more useful. We know it might be classified and you could be missing some info, but the general QOL features would be great (setting DL codes, setting up your group, and so on).

Then it isn't really changing anything. I wonder why it was added at all

@NineLine @BIGNEWY Can you please share some information on this new feature? It would be greatly appreciated! Should we expect the cable connection to be available as a part of the ground crew menu?

It does not mean anything at the moment. What it means in DCS, is that you can align in two different ways, depending on the availability of link4 on the carrier. If link4 is activated, and you turn on your DL (just link4, so only the first submenu) and tune in to the correct freq before you start aligning, the label 'CV RF' will be shown above your alignment timer. If it's not available or if your DL is not turned on, the label 'CV CBL' will be shown. Alignment speed seems the same for both modes, regardless of std hdg status. So, it actually does not mean a thing for us players.

On the throttle. No problem. It's a 4-way switch. I believe SRS added that functionality for people who don't have those available on their hotas system.

SRS does not reflect RL here, as the real jet has multiple PTT keys.

It does not

What I'm basically saying is "game breaking bugs should be fixed within a reasonable time frame" that is all.

There's no problem on my end. On speed flying is the same as it has always been.

I wasn't asking for the LRLS to be easily noticeable during the day. Just stating the fact that a visible laser won't suddenly become invisible during daytime, but it might be very hard to spot.