Emmy

Same here. Point Track off Snow Plow does not create a viable target. Should it? Or will that require the ability to make a Mark Point?

Don’t make ED turn this site around...

It really doesn’t need to, does it? It really only needs to have Akrotiri (sp?) and maybe one other, and more importantly, IMO, it opens up a better chunk of the Med for CV Ops.

So full of WIN! :megalol:

You Da Man, Chuck!

Subtle, right? :music_whistling:

Wednesday

I'm A Believer... Pre-ordered!

Yeah, so many more Europeans had the chance to learn German during WWI. That would have probably avoided WWII altogether...

Winwing

Perfect for attacking museums! :megalol:

Awesome...

Pickling the split second the window opens has always led to at least some inaccuracy so a little patience won’t hurt.

Over speeding the tires on the runway will make them blow.

It tumbles. The ERECT function is supposed to fix it.

Autopilot Interrupt. Temporarily disco’s the AP while held.

Don’t think we’ll see TFR. Not in the bird being modeled.

This is normal behavior which is why the Cage Knob needs to function properly to restore the instrument to level.

Can you post a sample .miz so people can have a look? A track file where it happens would also help.

First thing I always try: Move the IP back quite a ways. Heavy Bombers often need 20-30 (B-1s sometimes need 40nm) miles from IP to TGT. They can’t work with a “tactical” IP like fighters can where it’s sometimes 10-15 miles out.

FWIW, I have -5 on both pitch and roll curves in the Viper and I find it sufficiently “snappy” A-10 though is a little Apples Vs Oranges as it has direct linkages and no 1s and 0s involved in its control logic. During AAR, Viper controls are damped just like they are with the gear down. The proper percentage is in debate though.

Definitely all about “The Light”

ECM and ECCM are serious black arts and are probably the most closely guarded of military secrets. I think we’ll all have to live with simplifications in DCS. That’s not to say things couldn’t be perhaps modeled better but it will likely never be 100% accurate.

Re: The Channel Map I think the consensus is that it’s a bit of a mashup with some airfields being paved when they historically were not and others being useable when in fact, they’d been demo’d by the Germans much earlier than the late 1940s. There are also a few built up areas on the map that were not actually as well developed in the 1940s. There are several reviews on YouTube that address the not quite accurate timeline of the Channel Map. In the Caucuses, many of the airbases (according to Google Earth) are no longer active military bases. But the default time period on that map is not “Today”

But they could still reduce the luminance at the bottom of the brightness slider.