draconus

This should be core feature for all aircraft --> https://forum.dcs.world/forum/1027-dcs-wish-list/

It's a mess currently with the newer module's textures "low" being similar quality to older module's "high". More, even the one setting gives you some textures lower or higher depending on the part of the aircraft/cockpit. We'd have to have very detailed settings for each of the aircraft parts/cockpit to keep control of the quality vs performance or get it all overhauled to keep some standard.

DCS cannot control where you hang your VR.

They are gone for good, finally

You're right. Just tested F-14 and KC-130.

Guys, time to reveal a secret for you:

Confirmed all of the above having first person pilot body available, thanks @Skuva: https://forum.dcs.world/topic/293841-list-of-paid-aircraft-modules-that-support-visible-pilot-body-for-vr-users/page/2/#findComment-5636565

Works for me in Edge, Chrome and Firefox.

This is where you quit, save a track and upload here.

Yeah, not all of them are player drivable but most are - you can check if the "Player can drive" option is there in ME. If it's the only vehicle in your mission you'll start in F7 ground unit view - then you can hit Ralt+J to take control, no need to go into F10 map.

Never. Modern Syria should have different lighting than 80s Germany. Or do you mean something specific?

I wouldn't call it lightly loaded just because you're not hauling bombs. Techinically if you're launched overboard just below stall speed you still have 70 feet of altitude to get there.

Right, but the manifest and dll files don't add up to gigabytes of data.

I propose to stop adding fictional liveries. Ah, that's why I never heard it. I play in cockpit view and the shutdown procedure calls for opening canopy as the last step.

4.7GB download - what are you not telling us about?

Yes for Poland and DDR: and also according to wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-73_(missile)#Former_operators they say about Czechoslovakia.

Well, the hose connection wave is just a nice visual effect for a start but: the basket should react to aerodynamic forces near the aircraft (escape from the nose) the basket/hose should give a little stabilisation after connection and push back with minimal force boom should give a lot of stabilisation after connection (should hold the fighter size aircraft easily if trimmed and set proper power) the basket/boom should obey physics even when it's not intended for us (when buddy or AI is also in AAR process) the basket/boom should not autoconnect until an inch from the actual connection and the shape of basket/receptacle should ease up sliding in the basket/boom should not automatically disconnect after getting filling up the probe, basket, hose or boom can be damaged (including keeping the broken basket on the probe in some cases, hooking up the hose) no clipping of basket/hose or boom over the aircraft body some fuel spills during connections and disconnections option for both types of refueling on capable aircraft more wobbly basket depending on wind/turbulence settings no possibility of connecting from the the side or backwards What did I miss?

He won't react to your comms until you take off. You can only make him singleton group and then follow him.

You wrote about "missing Harrier" so one might read it as the regret about Razbam's Harrier withdrawn from the shop recently Anyway there are no official plans either from ED or from 3rd parties to make any Harrier module. You can wish for one here: https://forum.dcs.world/forum/207-dcs-core-wish-list/

No thx, they struggle to update their own modules, like F-14.

Can you guys help and confirm pilot body availability for FC2024 aircraft: MiG-15, F-86 and F-5E? This is to complete the list:

I can only confirm FC3 pack aircraft (these are the same as in the FC2024) and piloty body is available for Su-25A, Su-27/J-11A and Su-33. I'll try to ask in the forum wrt FC2024. RAZBAM aircraft may not be available for sale atm but they still are flyable for users that did bought them.