draconus

2 weeks ago it flew 100m over my head on full burner for over 10 minutes so I kind of have enough of Rafale for a while. Not that I complain or was in wrong place wrong time - it was totally expected

It is known.

Forgot about F-15C?

IPD is what you described it is and so it should be set in DCS and on your headset. It can affect how you see the scale in VR but I doubt you'll see a difference between 63 vs 65mm. Check extreme numbers like 40 vs 80 to see what I mean, just for fun. One will make you feel like a giant and the other makes you feel like a fly. Both will not affect the distant objects much though. That you feel altitude is off, I already said possible reasons (image realism and details) but it's not much devs can do about without major graphics improvemnts, especially when distance feels ok. Altitude is just vertical distance, right? Spotting depends on your settings esp. resolution, AA method and of course spotting dots setting.

It means you can use the pop-up window NS430 in the aircraft but if you want the nice 3D model installed in the cockpit you have to buy it separately for each aircraft. Caution: Currently flat mode is incompatible with VR devices.

The aircraft and its description is fine. The thread is about the "NS430 and NS430 for MiG-29" product and its false description, false and misleading marketing. Yes, half* of functionality (comms) is not implemented, and that is a big deal. If it was a simple mistake they'd have simply corrected it years ago. But they didn't and keep adding the same info for more aircraft. It depends on the implementation. The RL device has connectors to the external antennas for both GPS, NAV and radios plus 3 kinds of data buses to connect to the aircraft. You can either just connect power and GPS antenna and have it just like in DCS or you can integrate it fully with mic button, helmet headphones, aircraft nav, comm and other systems. *Maybe even 2/3 if you count NAV like VOR and ILS but I don't have details on that.

Technically we have none and none is planned. But the general types we have are F-4 and F-16, with A-6 coming soon.

Only for STT. That's from Jester seat using Next Launch button. No way to do that from the pilot seat - no such option in the Jester menu. As the manual says:

No, you'll have just one Afghanistan map license and that you'll be able to install. Even if you bought separate parts the install will take the same space as full map.

The monocle is far in front of the eye, easily over 7cm. So it is realistic to be visible by the left eye. What is wrong is that it shouldn't ever be in focus (blurred model needed). This however should work differently when HMD visible is deselected in the special options.

To report a bug you'll have to be very specific. "Doesn't accelerate that fast" is not very scientific approach, just a meaningless feeling, not worth looking into. I somehow doubt you'll be given exact flight data even if your friend is a real pilot. You'll need exact data points vs time containg ex. the TAS, current G, altitude, vertical speed (if not level), ambient temperature, aircraft loadout and fuel weight. PS. You also have to be sure the real aircraft in question is not modded in any way from the original version, especially for the engines and be sure that their condition after tens of years of service still enable them to output nominal power. Mods can also change the aircraft gross weight which also makes manual charts data incorrect.

But the models without light textures already are implemented and you see them during the day. That's why I said it doesn't matter if they are actual lights or baked textures - there are always two object versions: one for day and one for night.

Haha, good one, a "year or so"

Yeah, this is normal in DCS and watching the stars from Earth's atmosphere can result in similar effect. Also some starts are unrealistically bigger (in pixel size) - this may be a feature to make the brighter stars stand out more but looks bad, esp. in VR.

Make sure the aircraft has a parking spot suited for it. Might be the size limit. Best to be specific next time.

This is your false assumption.

Never had problem with that. Whole idea of VR and proper objects in a game is to have them correctly scaled, exactly to not feel any difference at least on that part. IPD change works only for close objects because that small parallax is not gonna change your view on the distant ones. The quality of the simulated terrain though leaves much for improvement and with limited headset resolution I think it has the biggest impact on how you perceive the world in DCS.

So fire half the team or make them do other things in which they are not experts and refuse to work on new projects that brings money in the future. If only DCS users were the ED managers we would have bug free game, feature creep, all aircraft and units modeled... and "out of business sign" on the main site in months.

I cannot reproduce. I barely get canopy reflections and I have them set to 1 (full). As said already, save a short track showing the issue and provide your dcs.log.

We cannot know. Maybe you entered some AP mode. Jettison commands are Lctrl+W and Lalt+R afaik. Try to recreate in simple free flight mission and save track next time. You mean every mission now? Check your bindings - axis assignments.

Unfortunately, afaik yes, no radio feature implemented. False marketing - that's why I've never bought it. It'd give a functional western radio for FC or redfor aircraft.

You're right. I see it now when I checked again - zoomed out more and set strobes on. These and landing lights where atrocious. Navs still disappeared over 200m.

Because it's unrealistic. Your wingman cannot know which one you locked without some additional describing commands. Afair it's free in limited version.