draconus

Warehouse > Tank 1 - rails are rendered depending on the view angle, while the other side is not visible, but after rotation these parts are visible, while the other not Structures > Chemical Tank A - rails are desynched with ladder about 90 degrees of object rotation Structures > Fuel tank - the dirt under the tank is semi-transparent for self model tanks.trk

Just found this report, but for Sinai map:

Hi, asking for a friend, because I don't have this map. Can you please check if the tanks objects render for you properly in this mission? The tanks are statics / warehouse / tank 2 and tank 3. Tank 1 works fine. I tested all tanks in Syria and Caucasus map and they work fine. Draconus.miz

For now it's only Zero: https://forum.dcs.world/forum/1367-dcs-a6m5b-zero/

It's your settings. Set "every frame" if you want them full fps.

Yes, definitely you should keep it slow - max conserve.

Wouldn't many become an IP at this point?

Track is needed. Isn't there a reloading truck nearby?

IRL it's mostly about the young healthy body that have perfect vision and can stand long flights and high Gs, which is not an issue in the simulator. Otherwise skills and experience wins.

You've found a griefer or a tool. Move on. Don't judge whole MP over this.

Why not? It was flying with Phoenix from the start in the 70s. Sorry you feel that way but here's reality kicking you hard. Haven't you expect this to happen? Didn't you read the thread: A lot of things work differently. Rules of the game have changed. Either adapt and learn it or keep flying FC3 verison but you can't expect to have good results when flying the aircraft in missions that are simply not suitable for this airframe - trying to force it as SEAD or BVR machine vs Fox 3 is just tormenting yourself.

Yes, this is study simulation of the aircraft with all its strenghts and weaknesses. You don't like it - you can load FC version that works exactly like you want or head to the mods section.

AWACS can give you two different calls: either BRAA from your position or Bulls Eye referenced. For BRAA you wouldn't need navgrid unless the mission is specially crafted in the way that you're responsible for defending given sector (haven't seen one yet) and check if the bandits entered the sector. For BE you'd set navgrid accordingly and have great SA on every call right on your TID. AWACS does not have built in navgrid functionality in DCS.

It's not practical, safe or SOP to launch from the ramp super heavy but it is totally possible, esp. with the WOD help.

Yes, they share a lot of the Su-27 avionics/systems/weapons.

Well, the mirrors set to 1024 on MiG-29A Fulcrum are top quality. It's not the same for all modules.

Never heard of such a conflict that F-35 would face Su-27SM or MiG-29SMT and it doesn't look like one is coming soon.

It is inconsistent somewhat, I admit, but since russian C stands for S letter it is not a bug - they just let it stay that way since the beginning. Note that also whole 9.13 group is NATO labeled Fulcrum-C.

It is?

Just as IRL. Yeah, would be nice to get these, maybe J-15 and Su-57 too.

Here you are. weapon test.trk

Yes, please

Thanks! Do you happen to know how it is in RL aircraft?

Yes, and make it fixed fov vs different zoom levels.