Hawkeye_UK

VR Pilot should come last - get the systems and aircraft finished first, ridiculous to be even chasing this when basics need to be completed, such as TDC slew which has just been bottomed out finally i believe. But cockpit click-ability and interaction along with MFD night time and brightness and contrast controls take precedence over a VR pilot along with sub pages that need to be completed. (PS - and i only fly VR)

It it helps you understand further for you guys they are using SVN.......

@decoy He's an idea - Razbam start acknowledging support bugs and issues raised on their existing modules, oh and resolving them. Let's start a new poll of what your customers actually want in terms of sorting out the modules you already have and actually reply to customers that have taken their time to provide testing for you and at least have the common courtesy to acknowledge them. Absolute joke regarding bringing out additional modules, lets have a reality check considering you struggle to support let alone complete the existing two released (some issues reported and 2 years still outstanding).

Let not divert the OP's post and point which is about communication. It is not negative or "trolling" in what i'm about to state. Razbam's communication with the community is disgusting when it comes to even acknowledging a fault in THEIR software, aka customers doing part of their job for them re testing for free and they cannot even be bothered to acknowledge the forum or discord or the person's effort to help their product. I cannot understand how they can be so far removed from reality they clearly lack a COO/CEO with any ability as the community manager would have been replaced along time ago if it was my company, plus i would have issued statements myself. If you remember last summer there was a brewing resentment with ED along the longstanding players - what happened, they had to improve their communication. Yes there are lot of problems still, especially with the bugs but their communication has improved, because it had to. If you really want anything to happen then need to start putting pressure on ED to sort out one of their third party suppliers because they really do need the proverbial rocket firing up their rear ends. Its a job for Kate to pick up and deal with as Razbam are currently, and have been for some time an absolute shambles. It makes me laugh when people start going on about the F15e or Mig23 - Are you seriously going to support a company that to all extents doesn't care about even the basics of communication. It's a point of principle. I'm calling it early but i can feel another Hawk debacle coming on.....

Since the last Open Beta update, the F10 spectre has returned. So for example, tac command or Left Control F10 whilst in flight can ruin FPS. Its almost like its still somehow trying to run that in the background and doesn't clear it or kill the process. Very draining and a main issue of FPS loss, noticed it on Caucasus, PG and the New Channel Map. Only play in VR, not that it makes a difference.

Guys just to be clear again - this is not an operational procedure issue with the player. Have many, many hours in the Harrier and know it inside out systems wise. This is a new bug mavericks are not always tracking the laser code, circa 50% success rate at best. Not working correctly since the last OB patch update. Good to see Razbam replying or reading the customer feedback that we provide, not one comment yet lol.

I've heard it also during start up on JF17, most annoying

agree with you lol it does break the immersion lol , oh and when you tilt your head and the clouds roll. But in terms of gameplay the sync is vital across clients

So let me guess you play SP only and / or haven't realised whats important in terms of tactical play as you only play against AI. The question you should be asking is not what pretty new clouds and weather is going to be here but when are they going to be synchronised across clients so that Player A and Player B see the exact same things. To say that WW2 simulation of either the P47 or Channel Map is "totally unnecessary" is so ignorant its insulting. At this very hour 76 years ago young men where airborne and dropping into Normandy and other's climbing into landing craft to storm the beaches in a few hours time to secure the world a freedom that you now live, fully knowing it was highly likely the last dawn they would see. Your attitude is disgusting and selfish.

AKG's are regularly intercepted by gepards and other ground based systems. Are you sure you mean the AKG as the ship version is the AK. Then again only play on a server that uses expert settings for all AI.

pretty much every module regarding panel warning lights or notification systems. How it got released god alone knows....

I've had issues not just with this but also with the seeker head not locking onto the target, or equally showing the locked on target but refusing to launch and release from the air-frame. Sometimes takes multiple pushes of the station button, cycling to nav mode and back a few times, its definitely something to do with the latest release as there is a noticeable change on reliability of employment. Also i use the harrier alot and know it inside out so i know its not a systems or incorrect procedure.

So i discovered today alot of modules are affected - warning lights on the cautionary panel of the L39, nosewheel steering light on F14 along with AOA indicator lights for on speed cannot be read at all now in daylight. F14 day time HUD super faint and hard to read. Not quite sure how these get released, like does no one just do a 5 minute flight in each module both in daytime and night. Even if i had to spawn up each plane and fly, both day and night its going to take a few hours at most of testing. Crazy really.

Yea i've stated before that posting things on facebook is all well and good however that they need to use these forums, aka the official place to update their customers that is accessible to all (not all of use facebook anymore or have a social media presence). Yea i know i'd had patience with Razbam for the last 2 years , but when module breaking things occur they need to react quicker especially on simple alterations of brightness. Thanks for the info re the Air combat sim podcast, appreciated :thumbup:!

Haha brilliant - I'd also said about this already oddly enough re the next module would be DCS Super Tanker - great artwork though and good fun lol !

Thanks for the update - good to see developers communicate as not all do lol !

Lol the Jaguar was more complex with a far higher pilot workload in comparison to the Tornado. Only had to look at the typical Jag pilots they were generally older with more flight hours in the log. Not sure how this would cope in today's MP environment however unless limited to cold war. In terms of what would be favourite's i'm confident it would be the Tornado and F-111. However Tornado still active (re Luftwaffe and Saudi - not that means anything these days re Truegrit). The F-111 would be immense, that thing could shift and supreme down low and fast as well as carry an insane amount of weapons.

Pointless, Razbam cannot get the basics right with their existing modules re AV8B and sort out simple keybinds (MFD brightness) and FLIR lighting issues and the HUD. Some of the issues reported been dragging on 2 years now. Will not be investing anymore into this developer until their customer communication on these forums dramatically improves along with them being able to retain coding team.

2 weeks on and no reply....however no shock (except painfully to your eyes at night). Absolute joke anyone that get's excited about this developer doing anything else for DCS is kidding themselves - the are a disaster awaiting to happen. Hawk module repeat springs to mind.

Yep been raised before, especially considering 66% of pay maps created are in a desert environment - unfortunately ED are all too poor on these easy wins. It does need doing as it looks ridiculous and its purely a simple colour palette change / texture. Same with the HAS Shelters that are green and command centre (need a desert one also). But of late i've come to the conclusion that unless you speak Russian and it is in the interest of the Dev's it won't get done. Half of ED's problems are caused by their internal structure, the best thing they could do is to diversify its code base to include European and US coder's, one to increase the productivity of the existing team but also for them to sharpen their pencil. Rather feel's like the Dev team have got the management of ED by the balls.

Maybe spend one minute looking at the harrier posts - there any many about this issue - However still nothing from Razbam, 3 months later for 2.5.6 lighting issues in cockpit and 2 years later regarding MFD brightness and contrast buttons on MFD. As your new always worth checking whats gone on in recent post - this has been reported so many times now. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=270133 https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=274223 https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=274185 https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=265670 To highlight just a few - good luck with getting any information from Razbam. Not buying any more modules from this developer as they have become very poor at communicating. If you want a good developer that communicates and is super fast on bug fixes look at Deka and the JF17.

And here lies the problem, "no time for that"! Don't expect to be good at anything in life without practice. I rather suspect you prefer to be flying around blowing stuff up, as if it was just flying you would have developed the formation flying skills needed to tank the aircraft. Back to basic's i'm afraid. Put the time in or don't expect to get good at this game in any detail.

We already have easy air to air refuelling!! No probe damage (would be good if they actually snapped off etc along with next point) No tanker basket or boom damage No oscillation of the drogue pipe whipping back. No real sudden turbulence modelling or realistic weather effects re sudden changes. No line up procedure. Probe sometimes magic's into the basket from the side. No comm's (as in what you would normally expect with the tanker). Ability to put user curves in. Ok so that's why its easy - what i would say is practice practice and pracitice, its like riding a bike there is just a feel to it. Key is getting trim and speed right and making slow adjustments. I would state for air to air refuelling quality of hardware does matter quite a bit also re input.

Push insert to switch to 3rd person view of vehicle, can then use CA. It is ludicrous though that something such as view binding cannot be sorted with just the reverse of the axis - i mean how hard can it be seriously. Always amazed me ED's inability to sort out simple problems and easy wins. Absolute shambles given VR is the future but already well adopted by the community in the present.

This is a Pointless post wthout specs you do yourself no favour. The whole point of the forum is to try and find help and compare with people with similar specs so as to gain insight / assistance. You didnt even mention how Supercarrier was running in 2.5.5 (which it clearly can't btw) so your comparing completely separate modules. As i said a pointless post - hopefully ED will close it.