Mike_Romeo

Because there is no evidence that they realy can carry them on those pylons. Show them a real life photo of BRM-1 90's, doubble racks or cluster bombs at the inner pylons or show them a real/official dokument and I am sure Deka will add them. Because of the engines, we have a Block 1 Jeff, so no smokeless engine for us. BTW I am pretty sure that the smokeless engines are newer engines and so they wont be many informations aviable.

Actually the JF-17 that we have in DCS isnt a Block 2. Its a block 1 with block 2 refueling probe wich is removeable

Rest in peace

There is no "better". It allways depends on the situation. But since the most modules dont have that jammer effect implemented yet, it doesnt matter.

Its very icon outside the US. More countries fly the Hind than the Apache.

I would say its correct as it is, the pilots in the MiG-29's are all sitting pretty low.

BRM's are much closer to the fuselage and the intakes of the engine. Also there is no real evidence that the real JF-17 can carry them on the inner pylons.

Because of the same reason why we dont have the BRM's on the inner pylons, because of the engine surge of the rockets. You can allready fell the surge from SD-10's when fired, now immagine a bigger roketmotor. It will damage the plane engine quite a lot.

Well I think there is a chance since Heatblur is doing a A-6 as AI

Caucasus is good enough in my opinion for a free map. The only thing I wish for caucasus are better detailed airports.

Yes, they did tweak the R-77 a little bit but they still want to completly rework them like they did with the Aim-120

Try one of this

Actually it is arcording to this document https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/upload/medialibrary/2e0/MiG-29 CFD Case Study EN.pdf. Also the MiG-29 use a professional flight model like every other expensiv plane too by ED

Deka Ironworks is considering to make the H-6 bomber

Su-30 is still in the race guys

Just want to say that 90% of the players play DCS offline (source). Not everyone plays multiplayer and who knows what the others fly in SP. Most of use dont care about how good or bad the capabilities of a plane are but the guys who play only multiplayer do because they only want to get as many kills as possible.

Totally worth it but keep in mind that is still early acces and that is unoptimised in some areas. But overall its a very beautiful map.

I belive yes since they do the R-60 for the Mi-24 at some point.

This paint scheme should exist as an official skin for the JF-17 as a "fictional red air" skin

Watch this offical tutorial. Will work for every controller

There are no detailed procedures aviable in the FC-3 planes like the F-15. Also the cockpit is not clickable. To start the entire plane you just have to turn on the electric power, start the engines, close the canopy and you are ready to go. So just 4 keyboard commands to start a multi million $ fighter jet. You can find the manual anyway in DCS World\Mods\aircraft\<module>\Doc ore here https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/downloads/documentation/f15c_flight_manual_en/ Btw, this is the most complex/completed checklist i could found for the F-15C https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/722011/ I would built a simpit for the F-15E Strike Eagle if I was you because its in work by Razbam as a high fidelity module.

El traductor de Google será tu mejor amigo.

Hier nochmal das selbe aber in deutlich besser von der Stormbirds-Seite https://stormbirds.blog/2021/01/09/new-dcs-mi-24p-information-translated-from-russian-interview/

You cant because there are on external websites A4 Skyhawk: https://heclak.github.io/community-a4e-c/ MB339: http://www.freccetricolorivirtuali.net/ Edge 540: http://virtualairrace.com/edge-540-mod/ Some other usefull mods can be found here https://forums.eagle.ru/forum/69-mods-and-apps/