Furiz

I see you saw TOPGUN 2 ;D

I think the problem is with those shaders not loading properly, but FLIR is work in progress so best you do is try to adjust gain brightness and contrast to get better picture

Overall I liked the movie, it is a good movie even tho combat is terribly off. after all it is a hollywood movie made to earn money. Combat scenes - if they were realistic they would be too boring for normal audience to watch so I didn't expect them to be nothing else than hollywood. If you ask me and I believe many flying DCS, combat scenes are pretty bad and I'd like them better but I know that wont happen in movies cause of said reason. Imagine them flying a strike sortie and hanging in air for few hours while SEAD and DEAD flights do their job... perfect for DCS pilots but terrible for broad audience. P.S. some one should tell them Ground Radar SEA mode doesn't detect airborne targets

FLIR is still work in progress, I guess it has to do with shaders not loading properly, cause I get different image from tiem to time, Try adjusting your gain, brightness and contrast to get better picture for now.

But do you realize that they would have to make (spend time and resources) completely new module - new avionics, new flight model, new 3d model etc - (they look the same but are not the same), for which they don't have a license (they probably have to buy it = invest money) and in the end they would have to charge it 80 bucks right? So those that bought Legacy Hornet get a discount, but those that didn't get to pay 80 for it, so they wont buy Legacy but Super Hornet obviously (not talking here about module collectors those are few) now most of their effort (time and resources) into Legacy Hornet goes down the drain cause they made the an upgraded Hornet, which can do all the stuff Legacy Hornet can and even more and even better, but hey a movie came out... :D Don't get me wrong I'd love to have it, as many modern jets as we can get, I just think that if their resources should be focused on some other jet, Europe or Russian and China if enough data is available off course so we expand our little modern jets family, than on developing a better version of something we have already and that version is not even finished yet.

Have you noticed the time that has passed between the 2 releases? it didn't happen right after the C was out right? I did say in my post, superhornet maybe after 5 years

So fast, good work guys, Merci!

cause those are different aircraft Hornet to Super Hornet makes Legacy Hornet absolete, yea Superhornet is different as well but it doesn't make much of a dieference.

Hornet is not even finished yet, lets get that done first. Making SuperHornet now would kill the sales of Hornet (specially if 3rd party does it), why would you buy Hornet if you can have better for same money. But if we are to have new airframe I'd rather they invest time in something other than US jet (Rafale, Gripen, EF is coming yey, J10, Flankers, Fulcrums etc etc.....), ofc they make what they can but investing time in yet another Hornet... maybe in 5 years from when current model gets finished. expanding current Hornet to 2 seat variant if enough interest maybe yea but rly not needed since you can do all with single seat version anyway.

Check your fuze on the GBU 12 as well, Tail Fuze is usually used when you want your bomb to penetrate prior to detonating, Nose Fuze - the bomb will explode when it impacts NSTL - Nose Tail fuze. But as the above poster said, GBU-31 (V)3/B and (V)4/B are pretty good with bunker busting .

Can you make a bug report with a short track?

Hey guys I don't know if this is possible to implement, Rafale has AOA indicator that looks a little bit different than the one US jets have: You can see it on this image, 2 green rectangles and a yellow one below them. You can see it in action in this Video: Thanks!

Tape M4.2+

Something like that would be great to hear, not just about Marianas map but about developing airframes and other maps as well, I think many would like to hear how ED turns an aircraft/map into digital product that makes many virtual pilots happy

Great work, thanks!

I guess that is denied too, there could be lots of AI aircraft in DCS like Rafale, Gripen, Alphajet, Eurofighter (that one is coming), Super Etendard etc... Then again Tornado is there as AI...

They do burn fuel in real life cause they don't want to land heavy on some short runways, so its not rly immersion killer (dropping tanks is tho), I burn fuel every time I need to rearm and refuel for immersion and it consumes few minutes of your time.

Problem is that it cant be a short track, so ED could recreate with cold start loaded with HARM and HTS, fire HARM and DO NOT power off the pylon after, when they land and rearm HARM it will bug. Or I can post a longer track but no assurance it wont be broken.

ED said they are working on that, also 1.15 - https://forum.dcs.world/guidelines/

You can open AAR doors prior to rearming and refueling on the ground to depressurize the tanks, they will start filling, but as internal tanks are filling up as well the filling process will stop when internals are full so it may leave your external tanks not filled up, so the less fuel in internals you have the more it will fill external tanks, I tend to burn my fuel till 3000 is left total so externals will fill up to full when I rearm my jet.

Balkans would be great, ww2 and yugoslavia conflicts were happening there, Operation Allied Force too.

Thy have their own "sim" with Rafale but it is not even close to what ED could do if given the oportunity, maybe in the future we get the chance. M F2 variant would be most welcomme

yea they should make all Mav capable planes do the alignment

Happened to me in MP too, when I landed to rearm HARM they wouldn't work, couldn't fire HARM, tried switching stores off and on, powering HARM of and on, HTS off and on, but nothing seemed to work, HAD page could not lock the emitter it would get stuck in handoff, white color.

To align mavericks you can use those taxiway signs for a fast align, you only have to wait till can power up. Also, don't know if you are aware, you only have to align one per pylon not all of them. So if you have 3 mounted on one pylon you only have to align one maverick. Maybe thats what was takin lots of time away.