Jump to content

Furiz

Members
  • Posts

    2151
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Furiz

  1. Yes, whole input capabilities didn't make it in to the current patch, work in progress, should be there soon tho.
  2. I think that best SEAD aircraft for such network in DCS would be Viper, but the network like IADS wont be an easy task. Viper still has to get ALQ-131 / ALQ-184 ECM pods then it will be true menace for those SAM sites, but alone it wont be able to do much vs that kind of network, it need lots of cooperation to bring that defense network down. Electronic warfare is a big part of SEAD, so it will need to be modeled in DCS so we can use its full poetntial vs those networks. That's how I see it currently, who knows what the future brings in DCS, hope for more goodies and more gen4 aircraft, and if possible, improvements in electronic warfare!
  3. Thnx for the good work, looking forward to the update!
  4. Well Bird Strikes are already there and tires can get blown up, but why wheel spray? just another impact on performance that contributes only to better graphic detail and to minor amount of immersion and that's it.
  5. With proper take off trim setup you can do that with DCS hornet.
  6. As soon as your caret hits the in range bracket you are in range, range depends on your speed and altitude.
  7. Yes there was, but they said that they want to do it but can't say anything officially or cant announce it officially. Of all possible modules by ED atm that one is most likely, altho not officially announced.
  8. Fulcrum is not announced. So maybe they announce it on the said video.
  9. PAS-13 doesn't have more than 3nm range, while Litening aboard Viper has much more range than that. With that range and zoom it can't provide such clear image at distance, given the level of tech back then. I love the improvement they have done so far!
  10. I can bet ED are working on new module, just don't know which one, every serious company plans at least 5 years ahead if not more, AH-64D is so close to early access, they can't afford being left with nothing new announced in January, and if they plan to get some income in late 2022 they need something soon, Main income from Apache will come from preorders and few month later, after that income from that heli will start dropping down.
  11. Who says it has to be in a dark room If it has to be a dark room with sparks, flames etc, I wish for Rafale but I'd say MiG29.
  12. Looks like its gonna be dynamic weather: https://forums.eagle.ru/uploads/monthly_2021_11/3EmDr5H.mp4.43b1d9966ce47dcd6226b260bcc960a6.mp4
  13. Yea, the OP simply asked for a guess on what will be teased in the Video...
  14. Cold start, aircraft and battery off, some knobs are illuminated at night. Right panel Left side panel
  15. The thread is about what will be teased in the video, I guess it wont be all of this right? but something has to hit, right ? We can all make lists, I can just copy paste wiki aircraft list or type all the possible outcomes but that's not the point of this thread, its about one thing we guess it will be shown in the video. I guess its gonna be MiG-29 I am hoping for Rafale M - F2 tho, but those are just my wishes:P
  16. That's what I've asked about friendly airfield, you were on neutral right?
  17. I'd love super bug too, I like gen 4 and beyond planes, but I'd rather see something else since we have the Hornet already (yes I know, its not the same engines, avionics etc...), Rafale, Gripen, EF(coming), or something from Russia, MiG29 (most likely?), SU27 etc... would be much much better in my opinion.
  18. Have you landed on the friendly airfield? What keys are you using to communicate?
  19. How can I explain something I didn't say, everything is realistic in real world.
  20. Well I thought he was talking about balance as in competitive balance, but the lack of Redfor modern FF planes doesn't mean we should not get any more modern planes. There is more options, than just redfor, I know redfor are most wanted by the people. But we shouldn't quit modern era because of that. Many enjoy flying modern planes in various missions, with or without redfor opponents.
  21. ED doesn't share your mindset, as they stated many many times, they are not trying to make a balanced game, they are trying to simulate aircrafts, and that's why I like this sim, its like real world, no balance.
  22. Yep but there is many new people that joined since, and priorities changed etc... so why not
  23. I would love more gen4 and beyond fighters, non US if possible, EU or Russian build, Rafale, Gripen, SU27, MiG29 etc... Dynamic Campaign Terrains
×
×
  • Create New...