Furiz

Love these reverse psychology attempts ED did their research and found out that some were able and some were not able to fire harm from 4 and 6 (this exact model, block and tape), not all of them were wired for HARM on 4 and 6, naming this fantasy module is really disrespectful to ED and their work. Your post looks like a 12y/o not getting his candy. You did a bit of research? where is that research? who did you speak to? where do they work, what rank/position in the US airforce do they have? which documents did you see, and how did you obtain those? You don't have to tell us, tell that to ED, send them PMs, they are always open for new evidence. Come to think of it, if you had some strong evidence you wouldn't come to the forum and insult someones work.

DCS World/Doc/Charts - DCS_VAD_Charts_FC3

Kneeboard code is the Bomb Seeker Code, the DED laser code is the code for Laser Designator from your TGP, and the other code on the DED is LST code for Laser Spot Search. In order to change the Bomb Code on your kneeboard you have to have your plane turned off, for DED page wait till your TGP is ON and rdy to be used then you can set your DED page codes. DED page codes can be changed during flight.

Love these reverse psychology attempts Ofc their commercial interest is more important, you think they get money from trees? Anyway, would be great to have it as SC, but it would probably be charged for. Something that should have been part of the core game, the crew and ATC...

Ok, thanks, didn't know that

Canopy open, canopy handle down and the canopy warning light is off, shouldn't the warning light be on with canopy open?

+1

FLIR improvement is being worked on, and this was reported already, in the meantime, in some cases adjusting contrast, brightness and AGC can help.

It has been reported already

Nice work!, what about the cockpit?

Merci!

As the title says, these CBUs are missing the target CBU-105 missing.trk Edit: Obi told me on disc it has been reported internally, sry then for double report;P

I can guess when it comes to those old airframes all they need is enough public interest to make it a module.

They seem to think they people decide to play DCS then they buy a computer And I don't think they know what it means to earn cash, and the value of money, and how some people in some countries earn way less for the same type of work then in some other country. In the end it really doesn't matter that the module is just a fraction of the hardware needed, that is not the point. The point is that 50 bucks for this animated crew is way too much, for the other stuff coming yea its ok price, but I only bought SC so I wouldn't be excluded from some servers, if it wasn't for that I wouldn't buy it, cause I am not interested in playing Air Boss or LSO or whatever else it has, so I was forced to buy it. It would be the best if they make the crew and comms available to all, and just charge for the rest of the module.

You can always gift a module, you would do double donation like that, one to ED and one to some lucky person

Dont know what happened so you have to say that but I never felt that way, their staff is alwas helpufull.

First 50% off is not 10 dollars, Naval Warfare pack doesn't make it free, you still had to pay for something, you couldn't get it for free without the rest of the pack, so its not free. But considering you have to refrain to insults to prove your point I don't think you have an abundance of intelligence to figure that out by yourself. You don't know who are you talking to on the other side so insults like these tell much about you. But since you wanna know, yea I can afford my lunch thanks.

That is not true.

Yea its amazing too how some exaggerate when its convenient for them but you can get along with 1000€ rig and 200€ hotas and Delan Clip oh look its more than half cheaper now... The 50$ for a runway with crew and comms is too much. It shouldn't even be charged for, but it is what it is now, extra features behind a paywall would be the best cause its not forcing anyone to buy it. as Reflected said, you want to play their Campaign with SC you have to buy SC... and you already have payed for carried based plane. And if you want to Edit in ME and place Stennis in there you have to do hours of work for one mission.

But you cant in a SC only MP server or a campaign, or you have to edit the missions etc...

And if you buy the hornet, shouldn't you be able to use carriers?

Yea you can look at it both ways, you have a choice not to buy it, but you cant play those missions and campaigns that have it, so then if you want to play those missions and campaigns you are forced to buy SC, so you are paywalled behind it to some content.

I can guess, it will be used for a month maybe for it is new and shiny, then people will turn back to SC cause the the immersion level is so much greater.

No it is not like any other DLC, for example: you can use Stennis when you buy any carrier based aircraft right? That's fine cause you can land at any base on the map you bought, but if the server you r playing on doesn't have Stennis anymore all of the sudden you cant fly carrier ops cause you didn't pay, but you did pay for carrier based aircraft and the carrier is there on that map. other game DLCs don't work like that. the comms and crew part shouldn't be behind a paywall, it should be an improvement to the core game, and all those assests as well. Fear the Bones campaign requires you to buy SC, Rise of the Persian Lion = SC, Operation Pontus = SC, dont wanna scroll more but you see my point, we are forced to buy it, if we don't we are paywalled for lots of stuff. I agree, they need to get their money too, but not like this, this should be something that is in the core game as an improvement, just like graphic and performance improvements.

No idea since many had to buy it as well as I did, cause you can't use it but you can see it and land on it... It's like buying a map but you cant use some of the runways cause you need to pay more, I know they had some hard work put into it, but as Harlikwin said paywall should have come later with LSO, Airboss etc... so people can operate from SC but if they want extra features they would have to pay. Now we are in the situation where they can hardly go back on this, since people payed already. As I said, bad idea to charge for SC like that. I just hope we wont get charged per airfield ground crew next.