SkateZilla Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 F-18C is from later than "2000" Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2), ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9) 3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs
Temp89 Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 For reference Would like to see: Panavia Tornado Panther AS565 English Electric Lightning.
shahin_sky Posted November 11, 2017 Posted November 11, 2017 Hi my friends and sorry for my english If I have strait of Hormuz Map can I fly and Land on some south part of IRAN ..... kish island «Khark island ..... Bandar abbas Base ..... Booshehr Base or ...... ????? As u know we had a long war on this part of my country and it would be remind memorabilia for me . thanks
Esac_mirmidon Posted November 11, 2017 Posted November 11, 2017 look at the bases in the map. " You must think in russian.." [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Windows 7 Home Premium-Intel 2500K OC 4.6-SSD Samsung EVO 860- MSI GTX 1080 - 16G RAM - 1920x1080 27´ Hotas Rhino X-55-MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals -Track IR 4
CoBlue Posted November 11, 2017 Posted November 11, 2017 90.000 square NM are roughly 410x410 Km. 90000 nautical mile² = 309086 km² ≈ 556x556km. https://converticious.com/area-square_nautical_mile-to-square_kilometer This is roughly 90.000 square NM with Dubai in the center. Your map is, ≈ 410x410km=168100km² = 48947.5nm² Roughly 45% to small. i7 8700k@4.7, 1080ti, DDR4 32GB, 2x SSD , HD 2TB, W10, ASUS 27", TrackIr5, TMWH, X-56, GProR.
Esac_mirmidon Posted November 11, 2017 Posted November 11, 2017 (edited) You are right. Wrong conversion on my side. Thanks for the math. I forget the x2 thing because is square NM. Edited November 11, 2017 by Esac_mirmidon " You must think in russian.." [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Windows 7 Home Premium-Intel 2500K OC 4.6-SSD Samsung EVO 860- MSI GTX 1080 - 16G RAM - 1920x1080 27´ Hotas Rhino X-55-MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals -Track IR 4
Tread_Head57 Posted November 11, 2017 Posted November 11, 2017 90000 nautical mile² = 309086 km² ≈ 556x556km. https://converticious.com/area-square_nautical_mile-to-square_kilometer Your map is, ≈ 410x410km=168100km² = 48947.5nm² Roughly 45% to small. Back in post #199 Wags has a screenshot of the exact areas covered by the SoH map.
CheckGear Posted November 11, 2017 Posted November 11, 2017 Sorry if I missed it, but will the SoH map encompass all the area shown below? look at the bases in the map. If so, can we expect to see Doha and Manama as well at some point in the future?
drPhibes Posted November 11, 2017 Posted November 11, 2017 Sorry if I missed it, but will the SoH map encompass all the area shown below? If so, can we expect to see Doha and Manama as well at some point in the future? https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3289055&postcount=199
AKULA_OPTIMUS Posted November 11, 2017 Posted November 11, 2017 (edited) If so, can we expect to see Doha and Manama as well at some point in the future? Is nowhere that big, and forget about Qatar or Barein:( Edited November 11, 2017 by AKULA_OPTIMUS Grammar error
CheckGear Posted November 11, 2017 Posted November 11, 2017 https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3289055&postcount=199 Thanks. I look forward to flying AV-8Bs, F-14s, and F/A-18s from "Gonzo Station" (Gulf of Oman/North Arabian Sea)! Is nowhere that big, and forget about Qatar or Barein:( I'm actually relieved that the map is smaller; it works better from a gameplay/mission-design perspective. Besides, Doha and Manama don't hold a candle to Abu Dhabi or Dubai. :thumbup:
Atooyi Posted November 11, 2017 Posted November 11, 2017 I'm actually relieved that the map is smaller; it works better from a gameplay/mission-design perspective. Besides, Doha and Manama don't hold a candle to Abu Dhabi or Dubai. :thumbup: But I'm worried somehow!!!! I've seen many guys spamming aim120s in servers, I can't even imagine how terrifying would it be if we see those spamming guys flying tomcats boarding 6 Aim-54s and spamming them over a map which is mostly covered by water :noexpression::noexpression::noexpression: 5-6 of those guys in tomcats and the whole map would be a no-fly zone:lol::lol::lol::lol:
CheckGear Posted November 11, 2017 Posted November 11, 2017 But I'm worried somehow!!!! I've seen many guys spamming aim120s in servers, I can't even imagine how terrifying would it be if we see those spamming guys flying tomcats boarding 6 Aim-54s and spamming them over a map which is mostly covered by water :noexpression::noexpression::noexpression: 5-6 of those guys in tomcats and the whole map would be a no-fly zone:lol::lol::lol::lol: :megalol: Well, if there's anything American air power's good for, it's a no-fly zone! :lol: In all seriousness, one way to mitigate this issue is to do what they do in real life - implement strict regulations and rules of engagement. For example, the F-14 rarely (as in almost never) carried more than 2 AIM-54s, due to weight issues. We can also require positive ID visually or via sensors before engagement and, in the absence of an immediate threat to oneself, have to request permission to engage. I think DCS permits such command-and-control measure to take place?
uboats Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 i think the 90,000 sq nm means the core area [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] My DCS Mods, Skins, Utilities and Scripts | Windows 10 | i7-4790K | GTX 980Ti Hybrid | 32GB RAM | 3TB SSD | | TM Warthog Stick | CH Pro Throttle + Pro Pedal | TIR5 Pro | TM MFD Cougar | Gun Camera: PrtScn |
NRG-Vampire Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 (edited) the map image of Wags is about 300*300 nm or 550*550 kilometers Edited November 12, 2017 by NRG-Vampire
Atooyi Posted November 13, 2017 Posted November 13, 2017 the map image of Wags is about 300*300 nm or 550*550 kilometers this map lacks one of the islands, called kish island!!!!!!!!! don't know why but they hadn't worked on it as it's one of the biggest airport of Iranian territory in Persian gulf!!!! and obviously covered in this map!!!!
ZHeN Posted November 13, 2017 Posted November 13, 2017 yep, it's there, in the top left corner, I can see it why no airfield guys ? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
QuiGon Posted November 13, 2017 Posted November 13, 2017 :megalol: Well, if there's anything American air power's good for, it's a no-fly zone! :lol: In all seriousness, one way to mitigate this issue is to do what they do in real life - implement strict regulations and rules of engagement. For example, the F-14 rarely (as in almost never) carried more than 2 AIM-54s, due to weight issues. We can also require positive ID visually or via sensors before engagement and, in the absence of an immediate threat to oneself, have to request permission to engage. I think DCS permits such command-and-control measure to take place? No, DCS does not permit such measures. You can only limit the type of weapons available, not how many you can load on your bird. There are also absolutly no control measures for ROEs. So that will indeed be problematic on such a small and open map on public servers. Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
Glimmer Posted November 13, 2017 Posted November 13, 2017 Waiting new Dynamic Campaign Servers with Primo Victoria style, different landing operations and naval battles, by the way China Ground Units coming soon. :) Су-27 Flanker | Су-30 Flanker-C | Су-33 Flanker-D | Су-34 Fullback | Су-24 Fencer | МиГ-29 Fulcrum | F-14A/B/D Tomcat | F/A-18C/D Hornet | F/A-18E/F Super Hornet | F-16C Fighting Falcon | F-15C Eagle | Eurofighter Typhoon | Tornado IDS | JAS-39 Gripen | AJ/JA(S)-37 Viggen | Rafale | M-2000 Mirage | Mirage F1 Ka-52 Hokum | Mi-28N Havoc | Mi-35M Hind | Mi-24P Hind | AH-64D Apache | AH-1W SuperCobra
some1 Posted November 13, 2017 Posted November 13, 2017 I'm actually relieved that the map is smaller; it works better from a gameplay/mission-design perspective. Besides, Doha and Manama don't hold a candle to Abu Dhabi or Dubai. :thumbup: Ummm, what? You mean that it's easier to create and play a mission where you can take off and hit your target within 5 minutes of flight. As opposed to actually spending time getting to the target like in real life. You can fly a circle around this map in a Hornet without aerial refuelling, and this is an aircraft known for its short range. 1 Hardware: VPForce Rhino, FSSB R3 Ultra, Virpil WarBRD, Hotas Warthog, Winwing F15EX, Slaw Rudder, GVL224 Trio Throttle, Thrustmaster MFDs, Saitek Trim wheel, Trackir 5, Quest Pro
firmek Posted November 13, 2017 Posted November 13, 2017 You can fly a circle around this map in a Hornet without aerial refuelling, and this is an aircraft known for its short range. I'm worried that in MP but not only this map will be like a knife fight in a phone booth. Another point is that the map is aimed for carier operations but with the size it'll be obvious where the carier is, which won't make perspectives for its life expectency to bright. Don't get me wrong, the screenshots show the map looking just amazing and it'll be a day one buy for me but the relative small size is an unused potential. 1 F/A-18, F-16, F-14, M-2000C, A-10C, AV-8B, AJS-37 Viggen, F-5E-3, F-86F, MiG-21bis, MiG-15bis, L-39 Albatros, C-101 Aviojet, P-51D, Spitfire LF Mk. IX, Bf 109 4-K, UH-1H, Mi-8, Ka-50, NTTR, Normandy, Persian Gulf... and not enough time to fully enjoy it all
some1 Posted November 13, 2017 Posted November 13, 2017 Yeah, I wonder if making a very detailed but small map is really the right approach for a modern combat sim. For an airquake arena or helicopter sandbox it probably is, but hard to make a plausible real-life scenario with that. Especially involving carriers. Hardware: VPForce Rhino, FSSB R3 Ultra, Virpil WarBRD, Hotas Warthog, Winwing F15EX, Slaw Rudder, GVL224 Trio Throttle, Thrustmaster MFDs, Saitek Trim wheel, Trackir 5, Quest Pro
Esac_mirmidon Posted November 13, 2017 Posted November 13, 2017 The Arabic Sea is already on the map at the East. You can place the 5th Fleet in a point somewhere outside the strait, for example, attacking Lar AB inside Iran from a point in the sea around 900 km. This place the Hornet outside the normal combat range of 750 km, forcing one refueling In and another out in the middle of Hormuz. This mission can be easily over 160 minutes. " You must think in russian.." [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Windows 7 Home Premium-Intel 2500K OC 4.6-SSD Samsung EVO 860- MSI GTX 1080 - 16G RAM - 1920x1080 27´ Hotas Rhino X-55-MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals -Track IR 4
some1 Posted November 13, 2017 Posted November 13, 2017 (edited) Not sure where you got that 900 km, the map posted by Wags is circa 550 by 550 km, which gives about 750 km diagonal. That's within Hornet combat radius, not just from Lar but from corner to corner. Second, Lar is not an AB, it's just a civilian airport without military facilities. To my knowledge, main Iranian airbases are outside the map area. Of course you can still make a mission that requires aerial refuelling on that map or forcing airplanes to fly for 2 hours, but I never said that you can't. Just putting things into perspective. Edited November 13, 2017 by some1 Hardware: VPForce Rhino, FSSB R3 Ultra, Virpil WarBRD, Hotas Warthog, Winwing F15EX, Slaw Rudder, GVL224 Trio Throttle, Thrustmaster MFDs, Saitek Trim wheel, Trackir 5, Quest Pro
Esac_mirmidon Posted November 13, 2017 Posted November 13, 2017 I mean this: The DCS maps have a detailed portion, for SOH is 550x500, and a basic not detailed space. Terrain outside the detailed space is not useful because the low res and ugly looking BUT for SOH there is one thing different. THE SEA. The sea has the same detail and aspect everywhere and because this map can be a Carrier Operations map you can place a fleet anywhere on the map. I dont care if is outside the detailed square, Is only sea. This is de SOH editors map. You can se the Arabic Sea on the East. Place the 5th Fleet over there at some point. Then start counting: Start up, INS alignment, take off, rejoin, climb and ferry to the initial refuel point ( all outside the Iranian territorial waters ), refuelling, ferry to a point of descent before the Iranian sea border, low level apprach to Lar, attack, low level egress, climb outside the sea border, refuel, ferry back to the carrier, land. This could be more or less 160 minutes or even more. An IMHO more than enough for any mission. Take offs, traps, two refuels, attacks, ferrys, climbs, low level ingress. A 1800 km mission length is not a telephone both for me. " You must think in russian.." [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Windows 7 Home Premium-Intel 2500K OC 4.6-SSD Samsung EVO 860- MSI GTX 1080 - 16G RAM - 1920x1080 27´ Hotas Rhino X-55-MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals -Track IR 4
Recommended Posts