Frostie Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 (edited) Please ED consider adding AIM-7 to the F-16 payload list, it was at least carried by the adf. It's a must for mp mission period creation. Edited February 16, 2019 by Frostie "[51☭] FROSTIE" #55 51st PVO "BISONS" Fastest MiG pilot in the world - TCR'10 https://100kiap.org
mvsgas Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 It was not. Not part of the USAF/ANG F-16C with CCIP payload circa 2007 To whom it may concern, I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that. Thank you for you patience. Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..
wasizyayo Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 There is no system that can be installed already in Block 50
ED Team NineLine Posted February 15, 2019 ED Team Posted February 15, 2019 AIM-7 was only on the F-16A ADF version Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**
Capn Penguin Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 :) Cap'n Penguin a.k.a. Lawndart extraordinaire i9-9900K Processor - 120mm Liquid Cooling System - 32G (8 GB x 4) DDR4-3200MHz - Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2080 Ti - 11GB - 1 TB Western Digital Blue SSD - Motherboard (MSI MAG Z390 Tomahawk) - Corsair RMX850 PSU - Windows 10 - Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS - Oculus Rift S - Old Lawn chair [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
probad Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 1. go back to your cj discord room to cry 2. get cj'd by your buddies about how you're right and ed is wrong 3. come back with argument about how the rules should be bent "for balance" picture friend i hope you're not mistaking agm-88s for sparrows
mvsgas Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 (edited) :) Those are AIM-120C, AIM-9X and AGM-88 and A block 52. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3800086&postcount=387 Edited February 15, 2019 by mvsgas To whom it may concern, I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that. Thank you for you patience. Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..
Capn Penguin Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 I'm not mistaking. Those are harms. We have been on WW duty since the mid 90's. Just saw "F-16 Payload" and thought I would throw out a bone on what I hope for, pods and all. So just ignore me, I was just passing through........ :) Cap'n Penguin a.k.a. Lawndart extraordinaire i9-9900K Processor - 120mm Liquid Cooling System - 32G (8 GB x 4) DDR4-3200MHz - Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2080 Ti - 11GB - 1 TB Western Digital Blue SSD - Motherboard (MSI MAG Z390 Tomahawk) - Corsair RMX850 PSU - Windows 10 - Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS - Oculus Rift S - Old Lawn chair [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
probad Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 well the thread title is misleading, this is just another balance thread in disguise
Banzaiib Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 well the thread title is misleading, this is just another balance thread in disguise I can see why someone would want AIM-7's on an f-16 to coincide with an 80's weapons rules scenario... even if not 100% realistic.
Baco Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 And again the super "Pure breads", crying FAULT when anyone has a reasonable request because its "not realistic" Well DAM no A-10 ever flew in Georgia.., nor F 18s ever opperated in the Black Sea, nor ever was a conflict with Iran, to date, nor you have SU 27s in Nevada.. so the whole DCS WORLD is "not realistic". or should I say Not Accurate. SO What if we get a payload that is not accurate? so Other nations pilots can simulate Their version of the viper, even if its NOT the specific Block, model, we are getting... Its hilarious to see how people asking to add "flexibility" to the sim are put down as "war criminals"... GEEZ
Tippis Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 Also, where's the GBU-39? Grr… :P ❧ ❧ Inside you are two wolves. One cannot land; the other shoots friendlies. You are a Goon. ❧ ❧
Frostie Posted February 15, 2019 Author Posted February 15, 2019 well the thread title is misleading, this is just another balance thread in disguise It is just a request, but yes you're right, we should only make missions for the public to enjoy from 2007 and beyond. Anything else would be scandalous, screw enjoyment and making the most of the product. I'm so sorry I will now conform to type by inserting the customary stick up my ass. "[51☭] FROSTIE" #55 51st PVO "BISONS" Fastest MiG pilot in the world - TCR'10 https://100kiap.org
Strikeeagle345 Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 Also, where's the GBU-39? Grr… :P Not an accurate weapon for an USAF F-16C Blk 50, 2007, OFP M4.2 :thumbup: Strike USLANTCOM.com i7-9700K OC 5GHz| MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON | 32GB DDR4 3200 | GTX 3090 | Samsung SSD | HP Reverb G2 | VIRPIL Alpha | VIRPIL Blackhawk | HOTAS Warthog
Tippis Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 :thumbup: Grrr, I tell you! :chair: (This may or may not be entirely influenced by flying doughnuts around VIP offsets on autopilot while dispensing SDB:s all over the countryside in that other F-16 everyone will be comparing against.) ❧ ❧ Inside you are two wolves. One cannot land; the other shoots friendlies. You are a Goon. ❧ ❧
_SwiVet_ Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 DCS: F-16C Block 50 and Other News DCS: F-16C Update As mentioned in our yearly wrap up, one of our biggest projects for this year is the legendary F-16C Fighting Falcon, also called the Viper. In parallel with the Hornet, we already have a sub-team working on the Viper that includes programmers who have completed their Hornet tasks. Much of their focus is currently on the flight model, Flight Control System (FLCS), cockpit and the external model. Using much of what we learned with the Hornet, progress has been good, and is in no way slowing down Hornet completion. As we pour the concrete, we can start to pass along some of our plans. Please remember they are plans, not timeline promises. Our Viper will be an F-16C with the Common Configuration Implementation Program (CCIP) upgrade. We feel this to be the most versatile version of the F-16 with capabilities for SEAD, precision attack, close air support, anti-ship, and of course air-to-air. We will be taking great care though to develop a very accurate simulation of the F-16C Block 50 operated by the United States Air Force and Air National Guard circa 2007. Core systems of our F-16C include: F-110-GE-129 turbofan engine AN/APG-68(V)5 multi-mode radar AN/ALR-56M Radar Warning Receiver AN/ALQ-131/184 ECM pods CCIP (Common Configuration Implementation Program) update ALE-47 countermeasure system This will be a massive project, so we will separate it into two phases: Phase 1 Early Access release and then Phase 2 Product Sustainment. Phase 1 Early Access Release: Color Multifunction Display (CMFD) symbology, Horizontal Situation Display (HSD) format, and Head-up Display (HUD) symbology Digitally TACAN and Electronic Horizontal Situation Indicator (EHSI) BDU-33, BDU-50LD/HD, Mk-82LDGP, Mk-82AIR, Mk-84LDGP, BLU-109/B, CBU-87 CEM, and CBU-97 SFW unguided bombs 2.75” rockets LAU-68 and LAU-131 Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS) AIM-9L/M/P/X Sidewinder AIM-120B/C AMRAAM M61A1 20mm cannon Phase 2 Product Sustainment: Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS) Link 16 Data Link AGM-65D/G/H/K Maverick AGM-88C HARM AN/ASQ-213 HARM Targeting System (HTS) Sniper XR Advanced Targeting Pod GBU-10, GBU-12, GBU-24A/B laser-guided bombs BRU-57/A Smart Rack CBU-103 CEM and CBU-105 SFW Inertially Aided Munitions (IAM) GBU-31/A, GBU-32, and GBU-38/B JDAM AGM-154/A and /B JSOW AGM-158/A JASSM Integration of the JHMCS with the HARM Targeting System (HTS), Link 16, and AIFF ALE-50 towed decoy As this project accelerates, we will be providing updates to keep you abreast of our progress to this much awaited addition to DCS World. ⁼ЅϮгаίϱϦϮеn цр, ϜІу ГϊϱϦϮ⁼
Kev2go Posted February 16, 2019 Posted February 16, 2019 DCS: F-16C Block 50 and Other News DCS: F-16C Update As mentioned in our yearly wrap up, one of our biggest projects for this year is the legendary F-16C Fighting Falcon, also called the Viper. In parallel with the Hornet, we already have a sub-team working on the Viper that includes programmers who have completed their Hornet tasks. Much of their focus is currently on the flight model, Flight Control System (FLCS), cockpit and the external model. Using much of what we learned with the Hornet, progress has been good, and is in no way slowing down Hornet completion. As we pour the concrete, we can start to pass along some of our plans. Please remember they are plans, not timeline promises. Our Viper will be an F-16C with the Common Configuration Implementation Program (CCIP) upgrade. We feel this to be the most versatile version of the F-16 with capabilities for SEAD, precision attack, close air support, anti-ship, and of course air-to-air. We will be taking great care though to develop a very accurate simulation of the F-16C Block 50 operated by the United States Air Force and Air National Guard circa 2007. Core systems of our F-16C include: F-110-GE-129 turbofan engine AN/APG-68(V)5 multi-mode radar AN/ALR-56M Radar Warning Receiver AN/ALQ-131/184 ECM pods CCIP (Common Configuration Implementation Program) update ALE-47 countermeasure system This will be a massive project, so we will separate it into two phases: Phase 1 Early Access release and then Phase 2 Product Sustainment. Phase 1 Early Access Release: Color Multifunction Display (CMFD) symbology, Horizontal Situation Display (HSD) format, and Head-up Display (HUD) symbology Digitally TACAN and Electronic Horizontal Situation Indicator (EHSI) BDU-33, BDU-50LD/HD, Mk-82LDGP, Mk-82AIR, Mk-84LDGP, BLU-109/B, CBU-87 CEM, and CBU-97 SFW unguided bombs 2.75” rockets LAU-68 and LAU-131 Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS) AIM-9L/M/P/X Sidewinder AIM-120B/C AMRAAM M61A1 20mm cannon Phase 2 Product Sustainment: Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS) Link 16 Data Link AGM-65D/G/H/K Maverick AGM-88C HARM AN/ASQ-213 HARM Targeting System (HTS) Sniper XR Advanced Targeting Pod GBU-10, GBU-12, GBU-24A/B laser-guided bombs BRU-57/A Smart Rack CBU-103 CEM and CBU-105 SFW Inertially Aided Munitions (IAM) GBU-31/A, GBU-32, and GBU-38/B JDAM AGM-154/A and /B JSOW AGM-158/A JASSM Integration of the JHMCS with the HARM Targeting System (HTS), Link 16, and AIFF ALE-50 towed decoy As this project accelerates, we will be providing updates to keep you abreast of our progress to this much awaited addition to DCS World. guess they forgot about Litening 2 ;) Should add it so we get a EA Viper with a TGP kinda how ED has decided to give LPOD for the Hornet ( USMC only) https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3800405&postcount=391 Build: Windows 10 64 bit Pro Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) , (Asus strix oc edition) Nvidia RTX 3080 12gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD, WD 1TB HDD
Mojeaux Posted February 16, 2019 Posted February 16, 2019 Ground Radar? Ground Radar? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Baco Posted February 16, 2019 Posted February 16, 2019 Ground Radar? I believe that would be covered by the "AN/APG-68(V)5 multi-mode radar"
Oceandar Posted February 16, 2019 Posted February 16, 2019 It was not. Not part of the USAF/ANG F-16C with CCIP payload circa 2007Is it capable of carrying it without major avionic modifications ? Mastering others is strength. Mastering yourself is true power. - Lao Tze
mvsgas Posted February 16, 2019 Posted February 16, 2019 (edited) Oceandar said: Is it capable of carrying it without major avionic modifications ? AFAIK, no. Not only programing for the Modular Mission Computer (MMC) and other components, but also wiring to the wing so the aircraft can talk to the missile. It addition, due to its weight, it can only be carried on station 3 and 7. Also, with the AIM-7 on those stations, I am not sure if you would have the physical clearance to carry any other weapons on station 4 and 6 without them hitting the AIM-7 fins if the weapons on station 4 or 6 where ejected or deployed. The problem with this is no matter what ED decides to do, will be a case of damn if you do and damn if you don't. If they add it, someone is bound to "disagree" with it being available. That persons will have people that share the same opinion and they will all do thread after thread on how it should be removed. They same will happen if they don't add the AIM-7. Sadly this will not end here. There is so much misinformation and confusion of what specifically an F-16 can do, there are going to be many thread like this for a while. Before and after it is release. Edited August 9, 2021 by mvsgas To whom it may concern, I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that. Thank you for you patience. Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..
mvsgas Posted February 16, 2019 Posted February 16, 2019 (edited) Also, where's the GBU-39? Grr… :P GBU-39 where not introduce until OFP 5.1 or higher at around 2014 IIRC. No other module we have as of this moment is that new. Not the F/A-18, not the A-10C, not the AV-8B, etc. I do not think it would be reasonable to see that. Edited February 16, 2019 by mvsgas To whom it may concern, I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that. Thank you for you patience. Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..
Mars Exulte Posted February 16, 2019 Posted February 16, 2019 (edited) And again the super "Pure breads", crying FAULT when anyone has a reasonable request because its "not realistic" Well DAM no A-10 ever flew in Georgia.., nor F 18s ever opperated in the Black Sea, nor ever was a conflict with Iran, to date, nor you have SU 27s in Nevada.. so the whole DCS WORLD is "not realistic". or should I say Not Accurate. SO What if we get a payload that is not accurate? so Other nations pilots can simulate Their version of the viper, even if its NOT the specific Block, model, we are getting... Its hilarious to see how people asking to add "flexibility" to the sim are put down as "war criminals"... GEEZ The aircraft/loadouts are realistic, how people use them may not be. Fictional scenarios are not in the same category as making up stuff about the aircraft themselves. It's not an 80's era aircraft. Pretty straightforward, it's the same era as the 10C and late F-18 we have, which, btw, DCS generally speaking is primarily set in the 2008 Georgian War. Other timeframes and maps are addons. The Caucasus, the core game, is 2008. Edited February 16, 2019 by zhukov032186 Де вороги, знайдуться козаки їх перемогти. 5800x3d * 3090 * 64gb * Reverb G2
Nealius Posted February 16, 2019 Posted February 16, 2019 I can see why someone would want AIM-7's on an f-16 to coincide with an 80's weapons rules scenario... even if not 100% realistic. Operationally in Desert Storm Vipers were only loaded with wingtip Sidewinders, and IIRC from 'Vipers in the Storm,' the air-to-air jockeys told the Viper drivers that there'd be trouble if they went for any air-to-air kills. Even in an 80s or 90s scenario I doubt Sparrows would have been used on the Viper.
some1 Posted February 16, 2019 Posted February 16, 2019 Exactly, it you want a realistic 80/90s combat experience in an F16, fly it with Sidewinders only. Sparrows were very rarely used (if ever) as F16s role was not BVR combat. Hardware: VPForce Rhino, FSSB R3 Ultra, Virpil WarBRD, Hotas Warthog, Winwing F15EX, Slaw Rudder, GVL224 Trio Throttle, Thrustmaster MFDs, Saitek Trim wheel, Trackir 5, Quest Pro
Recommended Posts